Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Laurence Champion, Florence Lerebours, Jean-Louis Alberini, Emmanuelle Fourme, Eric Gontier, Françoise Bertrand and Myriam Wartski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2015, 56 (9) 1315-1321; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.158287
Laurence Champion
1Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florence Lerebours
2Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Louis Alberini
1Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
3Faculté de Médecine, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emmanuelle Fourme
4Service de Biostatistiques, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Gontier
5Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées, Val de Grâce, Paris, France; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise Bertrand
6Service d’Anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Myriam Wartski
1Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    A 51-y-old woman with primary right IBC, axillary lymph node involvement, and pulmonary infection. IBC was grade 3 HR-negative/HER2-positive, with Ki-67 of 67.8%. (A and C) PET1 maximum-intensity projection image (A) and axial slice at level of breast (C). (B and D) PET2 maximum-intensity projection image (B) and axial slice at level of breast (D). ΔSUV1–2 and ΔSUV1–3 were −95%. Patient received 4 courses of anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 4 courses of taxane and trastuzumab. Pathologic complete response was found at surgery.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A 35-y-old woman with primary right IBC and affected axillary lymph node: PET1 (A) and PET3 (B) maximum-intensity projections. ΔSUV1–3 was −16.7%. IBC was grade 3 triple-negative, with Ki-67 of 30%. Patient received 6 courses of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Nonpathologic complete response was found at surgery.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Capacity of ΔSUV 1–3 to predict residual tumor at surgery after completion of NACT, derived by area under receiver-operating-characteristic curve (0.75).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics and Outcome of 23 Patients with IBC

    CharacteristicOverall populationpCR groupNon-pCR group
    Patients (n)235 (22%)18 (78%)
    Age (y)
     Mean ± SD51 ± 12.750.6 ± 9.952.2 ± 13.3
     Range34−7837–6034–78
    Histology
     Invasive ductal carcinoma22 (95%)4 (80%)18 (100%)
     Metaplastic carcinoma1 (5%)1 (20%)
    Elston–Ellis grade
     I2 (9%)2 (11%)
     II7 (30%)7 (39%)
     III14 (61%)5 (100%)9 (50%)
    HR status
     Positive11 (43%)1 (20%)10 (55%)
     Negative12 (57%)4 (80%)8 (45%)
    HER2 receptor status
     Positive5 (22%)2 (40%)3 (17%)
     Negative18 (78%)3 (60%)15 (83%)
     Triple-negative cancer7 (30%)2 (40%)5 (28%)
    Ki-67
     <25%7 (30%)1 (20%)6 (33%)
     ≥25%14 (61%)4 (80%)10 (55%)
     Unknown2 (9%)2 (12%)
    NACT
     Anthracycline alone14 (61%)4 (80%)10 (55%)
     Anthracycline and docetaxel9 (39%)1 (20%)8 (45%)
    Clinical response
     Complete response5 (22%)3 (60%)2 (11%)
     Partial response15 (65%)2 (40%)13 (72%)
     Stable disease3 (13%)3 (17%)
    Survival parameters (mo)
     DMFS (distant metastasis-free survival)52.64654
     Overall survival73.979.572.4
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Individual Characteristics of 23 IBC Patients

    Patient no.GradeHR statusHER2 statusTreatmentSUV1ΔSUV1–2ΔSUV1–3Clinical responsePathologic response
    13NegNegAnthracycline-based × 625−62.8%−70%PRNon-pCR
    23NegNegAnthracycline-based × 4, docetaxel × 43.9−43.6%−41%PRNon-pCR
    31PosNegAnthracycline-based × 64.3−72%−72%PRNon-pCR
    42PosNegAnthracycline-based × 614−50%−64.3%PRNon-pCR
    51PosNegAnthracycline-based × 614−2.1%−88.6%PRNon-pCR
    62NegPosAnthracycline-based × 64.9−81.6%−89.8%CRNon-pCR
    73NegPosAnthracycline-based × 616−84.4%−93.8%PRNon-pCR
    82PosNegAnthracycline-based × 68−50%−68.8%PRNon-pCR
    92NegPosAnthracycline-based × 4, docetaxel × 43.4−61.5%−61.8%PRNon-pCR
    103NegNegAnthracycline-based × 66−16.7%−16.7%SDNon-pCR
    113PosNegAnthracycline-based × 610−40%−70%PRNon-pCR
    122PosNegAnthracycline-based × 65.4−61.1%−64.8%PRNon-pCR
    133PosNegAnthracycline-based × 610.9−72.5%−86.2%CRNon-pCR
    142PosNegAnthracycline-based × 3, docetaxel × 311.9−65.5%−71%PRNon-pCR
    153PosNegAnthracycline-based × 63.20%−43.8%SDNon-pCR
    162NegNegAnthracycline-based × 4, docetaxel × 413.2−63.6%−78.8%SDNon-pCR
    173NegNegAnthracycline-based × 3, docetaxel × 312−79.2%−90.8%PRNon-pCR
    183PosNegAnthracycline-based × 4, docetaxel × 44.1−78%−87.8%PRNon-pCR
    193PosNegAnthracycline-based × 612.1−71.1%−91.7%PRpCR
    203NegPosAnthracycline-based × 3, docetaxel-trastuzumab × 422−95.5%−95.5%CRpCR
    213NegNegAnthracycline-based × 616−70%−87.5%CRpCR
    223NegPosAnthracycline-based × 3, docetaxel-trastuzumab × 36.6−50%−66.7%PRpCR
    233NegNegAnthracycline-based × 4, docetaxel × 412−25%−81%CRpCR
    • Neg = negative; Pos = positive; PR = partial response; CR = complete response; SD = stable disease.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Multivariate Analysis for Distant Metastasis–Free Survival

    VariableP
    ΔSUV1–30.0128
    Clinical response0.0280
    Histologic grade0.0384
    Age0.1078
    Pathologic response0.1321
    Hormone receptor status0.2270
    HER2 status0.6391
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Molecular Breast Cancer Subtype Analysis

    Pathologic responseSurvival (mo)
    Molecular subtypenpCRNon-pCRSUVmax, PET1ΔSUV1–3DMFSOS
    HR-positive/HER2-negative111109.5 ± 3.8−69% ± 1870.294.3
    HR-negative/HER2-positive52316.7 ± 5.3−94% ± 1745.878.7
    Triple-negative72512.5 ± 7−85% ± 2736.763.7
    • DMFS = distant metastasis-free-survival; OS = overall survival.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (9)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 9
September 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Laurence Champion, Florence Lerebours, Jean-Louis Alberini, Emmanuelle Fourme, Eric Gontier, Françoise Bertrand, Myriam Wartski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2015, 56 (9) 1315-1321; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158287

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
18F-FDG PET/CT to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Laurence Champion, Florence Lerebours, Jean-Louis Alberini, Emmanuelle Fourme, Eric Gontier, Françoise Bertrand, Myriam Wartski
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2015, 56 (9) 1315-1321; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.158287
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Complete Metabolic Response on Interim 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict Long-Term Survival in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Inflammatory breast cancer
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • survival
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire