Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

PET Imaging of Macrophage Mannose Receptor–Expressing Macrophages in Tumor Stroma Using 18F-Radiolabeled Camelid Single-Domain Antibody Fragments

Anneleen Blykers, Steve Schoonooghe, Catarina Xavier, Kevin D’hoe, Damya Laoui, Matthias D’Huyvetter, Ilse Vaneycken, Frederik Cleeren, Guy Bormans, Johannes Heemskerk, Geert Raes, Patrick De Baetselier, Tony Lahoutte, Nick Devoogdt, Jo A. Van Ginderachter and Vicky Caveliers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2015, 56 (8) 1265-1271; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.156828
Anneleen Blykers
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve Schoonooghe
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catarina Xavier
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin D’hoe
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damya Laoui
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias D’Huyvetter
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilse Vaneycken
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik Cleeren
5Laboratory for Radiopharmacy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy Bormans
5Laboratory for Radiopharmacy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Heemskerk
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geert Raes
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick De Baetselier
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony Lahoutte
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nick Devoogdt
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo A. Van Ginderachter
2Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
3Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology (MCI), VIB, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vicky Caveliers
1In Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging laboratory (ICMI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
4Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) Staining of single-cell suspensions prepared from 15-d-old 3LL-R subcutaneous tumors grown in C57BL/6 WT mice. (B) Staining on immature human dendritic cells expressing human MMR. Shaded histograms represent sdAb BCII10–negative control staining.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    RP-HPLC analysis of purified 18F-FB-anti-MMR 3.49 sdAb (A; γ trace black, left axis; UV trace blue, right axis; retention time = 12.5 min) and after incubation for 3 h in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, at room temperature (B; γ trace). (C) Reversed-phase chromatogram of urine obtained 30 min after injection of 18F-FB-anti-MMR 3.49 (γ trace).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Comparison between uptake of 18F-FB-anti-MMR 3.49 sdAb (♦) and 99mTc-anti-MMR 3.49 sdAb (□) in spleen, liver, and tumor 3 h after injection. *Data are significantly different, P < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Transverse and coronal PET/CT images of WT (left) vs. MMR-deficient (right) 3LL-R tumor–bearing mice scanned 3 h after injection of 18F-FB-anti MMR 3.49. PET signals are encoded in color scale, CT image in gray scale. Arrows point to tumor (T), kidney (K), and bladder (B). Autoradiography performed on slices from 3LL-R tumors grown in WT (left) vs. MMR-deficient (right) mice. max = maximum; min = minimum.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Binding Kinetics of sdAbs on Human and Mouse MMR

    hMMRmMMR
    sdAbka (M−1 s−1)kd (s−1)KD (nM)ka (M−1 s−1)kd (s−1)KD (nM)
    14.41.4 × 1051.4 × 10−3103.3 × 1042.3 × 10−368
    5.382.0 × 1056.6 × 10−43.31.3 × 1053.3 × 10−325
    26.75.8 × 1057.3 × 10−3136.9 × 1051.3 × 10−31.9
    3.494.4 × 1058.0 × 10−41.82.9 × 1053.6 × 10−312
    • h = human; m = mouse; ka = association rate constant; kd = dissociation rate constant; KD = equilibrium dissociation constant.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Biodistribution of 99mTc-Anti-MMR sdAbs in 3LL-R–Bearing WT and MMR-KO Mice

    Organ/tissue99mTc-anti-MMR 3.49 WT (n = 3)99mTc-anti-MMR 14.4 WT (n = 3)99mTc-anti-MMR 3.49 MMR-KO (n = 2)
    Heart2.18 ± 0.152.77 ± 0.770.14 ± 0.02
    Lungs1.44 ± 0.150.92 ± 0.280.40 ± 0.08
    Liver14.79 ± 0.5227.37 ± 3.370.61 ± 0.05
    Spleen4.94 ± 0.326.20 ± 1.690.22 ± 0.04
    Kidney146.61 ± 2.8569.30 ± 11.46234.77 ± 25.91
    Muscle0.57 ± 0.140.42 ± 0.110.06 ± 0.02
    Bone1.88 ± 0.171.78 ± 0.810.12 ± 0.01
    Lymph nodes3.04 ± 0.333.02 ± 0.460.19 ± 0.04
    Blood0.30 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.020.18 ± 0.03
    Tumor2.41 ± 0.341.40 ± 0.26Not done
    • Data were obtained at 3 h after injection and expressed as mean %IA/g ± SD.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Biodistribution of 18F-FB-Anti-MMR 3.49 sdAb in 3LL-R–Bearing WT, MMR-Deficient, and CCR-2–Deficient Mice at 3 Hours After Injection

    Organ/tissueWT mice (n = 8)MMR-KO mice (n = 8)CCR2-KO mice (n = 5)
    Lungs1.60 ± 0.400.82 ± 0.521.45 ± 0.14
    Heart0.81 ± 0.110.28 ± 0.12*1.00 ± 0.14
    Liver2.26 ± 0.510.52 ± 0.30*2.54 ± 0.31
    Spleen1.34 ± 0.310.38 ± 0.16*1.71 ± 0.69
    Kidney7.98 ± 0.864.76 ± 2.767.60 ± 0.76
    Muscle0.37 ± 0.140.10 ± 0.07*0.42 ± 0.27
    Bone0.67 ± 0.280.15 ± 0.02*1.03 ± 0.20
    Blood1.02 ± 0.310.73 ± 0.311.16 ± 0.20
    Tumor2.40 ± 0.460.29 ± 0.14*1.42 ± 0.17†
    • ↵* Data are significantly different, P < 0.05.

    • Data are expressed as mean %IA/g ± SD.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (8)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 8
August 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET Imaging of Macrophage Mannose Receptor–Expressing Macrophages in Tumor Stroma Using 18F-Radiolabeled Camelid Single-Domain Antibody Fragments
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET Imaging of Macrophage Mannose Receptor–Expressing Macrophages in Tumor Stroma Using 18F-Radiolabeled Camelid Single-Domain Antibody Fragments
Anneleen Blykers, Steve Schoonooghe, Catarina Xavier, Kevin D’hoe, Damya Laoui, Matthias D’Huyvetter, Ilse Vaneycken, Frederik Cleeren, Guy Bormans, Johannes Heemskerk, Geert Raes, Patrick De Baetselier, Tony Lahoutte, Nick Devoogdt, Jo A. Van Ginderachter, Vicky Caveliers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1265-1271; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156828

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET Imaging of Macrophage Mannose Receptor–Expressing Macrophages in Tumor Stroma Using 18F-Radiolabeled Camelid Single-Domain Antibody Fragments
Anneleen Blykers, Steve Schoonooghe, Catarina Xavier, Kevin D’hoe, Damya Laoui, Matthias D’Huyvetter, Ilse Vaneycken, Frederik Cleeren, Guy Bormans, Johannes Heemskerk, Geert Raes, Patrick De Baetselier, Tony Lahoutte, Nick Devoogdt, Jo A. Van Ginderachter, Vicky Caveliers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2015, 56 (8) 1265-1271; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.156828
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Phase I Study of [68Ga]Ga-Anti-CD206-sdAb for PET/CT Assessment of Protumorigenic Macrophage Presence in Solid Tumors (MMR Phase I)
  • Single-Domain Antibody Theranostics on the Horizon
  • Single-Domain Antibody Nuclear Imaging Allows Noninvasive Quantification of LAG-3 Expression by Tumor-Infiltrating Leukocytes and Predicts Response of Immune Checkpoint Blockade
  • Single-domain antibodies for targeting, detection and in vivo imaging of human CD4+ cells
  • Radionuclide Image-Guided Repair of the Heart
  • Molecular Imaging of Myocardial Inflammation With Positron Emission Tomography Post-Ischemia: A Determinant of Subsequent Remodeling or Recovery
  • The Immunoimaging Toolbox
  • Same-Day Imaging Using Small Proteins: Clinical Experience and Translational Prospects in Oncology
  • Preclinical Evaluation of 18F-Labeled Anti-HER2 Nanobody Conjugates for Imaging HER2 Receptor Expression by Immuno-PET
  • An Effective Immuno-PET Imaging Method to Monitor CD8-Dependent Responses to Immunotherapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
  • How Sensitive Is the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract to 90Y Radioembolization? A Histologic and Dosimetric Analysis in a Porcine Model
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Macrophage Mannose Receptor (MMR)
  • camelid single-domain antibody fragment (sdAb)
  • 18F
  • PET
  • tumor microenvironment
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire