Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Clinical Relevance of Targeting the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor, Somatostatin Receptor 2, or Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor 4 in Breast Cancer for Imaging and Therapy

Simone U. Dalm, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Maxime P. Look, Marleen Melis, Carolien H.M. van Deurzen, John A. Foekens, Marion de Jong and John W.M. Martens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2015, 56 (10) 1487-1493; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.160739
Simone U. Dalm
1Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anieta M. Sieuwerts
2Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxime P. Look
2Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marleen Melis
1Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolien H.M. van Deurzen
3Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John A. Foekens
2Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marion de Jong
1Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W.M. Martens
2Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Study design. mRNA expression levels of GRPR, SSTR2, and CXCR4 of 915 primary breast cancer specimens (684 M0 LNN, 194 M0 LNP, 13 with unknown nodal status, and 24 M1) were analyzed using RT-qPCR. LNN and LNP M0 patient groups were used to study association of GRPR, SSTR2, and CXCR4 expression and clinicopathologic and biologic factors, with focus on M0 LNN patient group. Association of GRPR, SSTR2, and CXCR4 with prognostic factors was studied in M0 LNN patients. mRNA levels of ER-positive primary tumors of patients with recurrent breast cancer who received first-line tamoxifen treatment were used to study association of GRPR, SSTR2, and CXCR4 mRNA expression and PFS.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) In vitro autoradiography of human breast cancer specimens using 111In-AMBA (GRP analog) and 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (SST analog) with and without block, demonstrating specific binding of radiotracers to receptor-positive tumor tissue. H69 (SSTR-positive, GRPR-negative) and PC3 xenografts (SSTR-negative, GRPR-positive) were used as controls. Tumor-containing areas are encircled in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stainings. As example, arrows indicate non–tumor-containing tissue in first H&E staining. (B) Significant correlation between GRPR and SSTR2 mRNA levels and quantification of in vitro autoradiography results analyzed in 13 breast cancer specimens with variable receptor expression, demonstrating that mRNA levels of receptors can be used as predictor for radiotracer binding. AD = added dose.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Distant MFS in 684 LNN patients as function of levels of CXCR4. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Association of GRPR expression with PFS on first-line tamoxifen treatment. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Associations of GRPR, SSTR2, and CXCR4 mRNA Levels in LNN M0 Patients

    GRPR mRNA (x10−2)SSTR2 mRNA (x10−2)CXCR4 mRNA (x10−2)
    CharacteristicNo. of patients*Percentage of patientsMedianInterquartile rangeMedianInterquartile rangeMedianInterquartile range
    All patients in this cohort684100%0.727.070.581.7511.7813.13
    Age at surgery (y)
     ≤40609%1.1712.720.902.9914.0613.75
     41–5525237%0.979.200.611.6411.5813.18
     56–7021832%0.525.380.521.6812.1911.34
     >7015423%0.724.440.621.619.9912.98
     P†0.520.680.0403
    Menopausal status
     Premenopausal27340%1.2610.950.621.8211.8113.73
     Postmenopausal41160%0.604.870.551.5711.7612.12
     P†0.130.530.39
    Surgery
     Lumpectomy37855%0.617.690.571.8211.6713.15
     Ablation30645%0.906.790.601.5611.9013.00
     P†0.690.590.65
    Pathologic tumor size
     pT130745%1.258.540.691.8712.0313.40
     pT2 + unknown35151%0.415.250.511.6511.5312.84
     pT3 + pT4264%0.583.050.501.3812.1913.53
     P†0.00140.240.92
    ESR1 mRNA status‡
     Negative < 0.218427%0.090.130.280.4214.7413.83
     Positive ≥ 0.250073%2.4610.980.812.5910.9812.16
     P‡<0.001<0.001<0.001
    PGR mRNA status‡
     Negative < 0.128542%0.120.320.320.5614.3614.31
     Positive ≥ 0.139958%3.6712.681.022.9810.4511.09
     P‡< 0.001<0.001<0.001
    ERBB2 mRNA status‡
     Negative < 1857484%0.998.280.611.9211.6412.96
     Positive ≥ 1810716%0.301.510.491.0013.8813.32
     P¶<0.0010.03440.22
    Grade (GGI)
     122733%2.4210.460.752.1110.8311.03
     222933%0.896.920.632.4111.4414.59
     322433%0.131.420.340.9813.8313.58
     P¶<0.001<0.001<0.001
    Percentage invasive tumor cells
     ≤70%47069%0.816.840.631.8812.5713.92
     >70%21431%0.648.280.431.289.1310.70
     P†0.870.002<0.001
    • ↵* Because of missing numbers, not all categories add up to 684.

    • ↵† P for Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis test when appropriate.

    • ↵‡ ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 were determined by real-time PCR; cut points were as follows: ESR1 = 0.2, PGR = 0.1, and ERBB2 = 18.0 (mRNA level relative to reference gene set).

    • ↵¶ P for Spearman rank-correlation test.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 56 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 56, Issue 10
October 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Relevance of Targeting the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor, Somatostatin Receptor 2, or Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor 4 in Breast Cancer for Imaging and Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical Relevance of Targeting the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor, Somatostatin Receptor 2, or Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor 4 in Breast Cancer for Imaging and Therapy
Simone U. Dalm, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Maxime P. Look, Marleen Melis, Carolien H.M. van Deurzen, John A. Foekens, Marion de Jong, John W.M. Martens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, 56 (10) 1487-1493; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160739

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Clinical Relevance of Targeting the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor, Somatostatin Receptor 2, or Chemokine C-X-C Motif Receptor 4 in Breast Cancer for Imaging and Therapy
Simone U. Dalm, Anieta M. Sieuwerts, Maxime P. Look, Marleen Melis, Carolien H.M. van Deurzen, John A. Foekens, Marion de Jong, John W.M. Martens
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2015, 56 (10) 1487-1493; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160739
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Vision for Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Targeting for Imaging and Therapy: Perspective from Academia and Industry
  • Substitution of L-Tryptophan by {alpha}-Methyl-L-Tryptophan in 177Lu-RM2 Results in 177Lu-AMTG, a High-Affinity Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Ligand with Improved In Vivo Stability
  • Imaging the Distribution of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptors in Cancer
  • SSTR-Mediated Imaging in Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists?
  • Expression of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor in Breast Cancer and Its Association with Pathologic, Biologic, and Clinical Parameters: A Study of 1,432 Primary Tumors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • GRPR
  • SSTR2
  • CXCR4
  • PRS/PRRT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire