Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBasic Science Investigations

Introduction of an 8-Aminooctanoic Acid Linker Enhances Uptake of 99mTc-Labeled Lactam Bridge–Cyclized α-MSH Peptide in Melanoma

Haixun Guo and Yubin Miao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2014, 55 (12) 2057-2063; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145896
Haixun Guo
1College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yubin Miao
1College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
2Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; and
3Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Schematic structures of HYNIC-linker-Nle-CycMSHhex.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    In vitro competitive binding curves of HYNIC-PEG2Nle-CycMSHhex (●, IC50 = 0.3 ± 0.06 nM), HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex (▲, IC50 = 0.4 ± 0.08 nM), HYNIC-GGGNle-CycMSHhex (▪, IC50 = 0.7 ± 0.1 nM), and HYNIC-GSGNle-CycMSHhex (♦, IC50 = 0.8 ± 0.09 nM) in B16/F1 murine melanoma cells.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Representative whole-body (A), coronal (B), and transversal (C) SPECT/CT images of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex in B16/F1 melanoma–bearing C57 mouse at 2 h after injection. K = kidney; T = tumor.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Comparison of tumor-to-kidney ratios between 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex and 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex at 0.5, 2, 4, and 24 h after injection. Data on 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex (12) are shown for comparison.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    IC50 Values and Molecular Weights of 4 Peptides

    PeptideIC50 (nM)Calculated MWMeasured MW
    HYNIC-GGNle-CycMSHhex*0.6 ± 0.041,232.41,232.8
    HYNIC-GGGNle-CycMSHhex0.7 ± 0.11,288.01,288.2
    HYNIC-GSGNle-CycMSHhex0.8 ± 0.091,318.01,318.9
    HYNIC-PEG2Nle-CycMSHhex0.3 ± 0.061,262.01,261.8
    HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex0.4 ± 0.081,257.01,257.3
    • ↵* Data are shown for comparison (12).

    • MW = molecular weight.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Biodistribution Comparison Among Peptides in B16/F1 Melanoma–Bearing C57 Mice 2 Hours After Injection

    TissueGGGGSGPEG2Aoc
    %ID/g
     Tumor9.78 ± 3.407.41 ± 4.2614.32 ± 2.8222.3 ± 1.72
     Brain0.05 ± 0.030.07 ± 0.110.03 ± 0.020.04 ± 0.04
     Blood0.07 ± 0.010.08 ± 0.060.39 ± 0.070.28 ± 0.01
     Heart0.04 ± 0.030.06 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.030.20 ± 0.10
     Lung0.18 ± 0.120.15 ± 0.050.27 ± 0.120.38 ± 0.19
     Liver0.26 ± 0.030.23 ± 0.010.33 ± 0.030.81 ± 0.03
     Spleen0.16 ± 0.090.08 ± 0.020.11 ± 0.080.24 ± 0.00
     Stomach0.43 ± 0.270.48 ± 0.390.43 ± 0.050.70 ± 0.36
     Kidneys5.09 ± 2.193.90 ± 1.015.79 ± 1.796.52 ± 1.04
     Muscle0.03 ± 0.030.05 ± 0.020.03 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.05
     Pancreas0.02 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.060.09 ± 0.00
     Bone0.08 ± 0.060.12 ± 0.130.29 ± 0.140.27 ± 0.10
     Skin0.31 ± 0.100.22 ± 0.060.49 ± 0.070.43 ± 0.11
    %ID
     Intestines0.52 ± 0.090.72 ± 0.270.99 ± 0.551.85 ± 0.51
     Urine93.90 ± 1.4795.25 ± 0.5293.19 ± 1.9188.46 ± 2.23
    T/NT
     Liver37.2632.2643.1427.51
     Kidney1.921.902.483.42
     Lung54.4450.0753.7257.99
     Muscle351.42146.90465.25378.94
     Blood147.6298.0536.8079.79
     Skin31.7534.0129.4052.23
    • GGG = 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GGGNle-CycMSHhex; GSG = 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-GSGNle-CycMSHhex; PEG2 = 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-PEG2Nle-CycMSHhex; Aoc = 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex; T/NT = tumor–to–normal-tissue uptake ratio.

    • Data are %ID/g or %ID (mean ± SD, n = 5).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Biodistribution of 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex in B16/F1 Melanoma–Bearing C57 Mice

    Tissue0.5 h2 h4 h24 h2-h NDP blockade2-h L-lys coinjection
    %ID/g
     Tumor23.44 ± 3.3722.8 ± 1.7122.17 ± 5.937.13 ± 0.991.26 ± 0.59*25.85 ± 6.8
     Brain0.17 ± 0.070.05 ± 0.030.02 ± 0.020.01 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.010.03 ± 0.01
     Blood2.98 ± 1.770.40 ± 0.140.30 ± 0.140.09 ± 0.030.82 ± 0.150.18 ± 0.13
     Heart1.75 ± 0.310.23 ± 0.080.13 ± 0.090.07 ± 0.020.32 ± 0.090.14 ± 0.01
     Lung4.06 ± 1.600.52 ± 0.200.50 ± 0.190.14 ± 0.020.91 ± 0.060.59 ± 0.06
     Liver3.19 ± 0.391.09 ± 0.331.26 ± 0.600.36 ± 0.011.22 ± 0.121.22 ± 0.15
     Spleen0.94 ± 0.720.30 ± 0.130.32 ± 0.130.05 ± 0.040.17 ± 0.110.22 ± 0.09
     Stomach2.52 ± 0.221.07 ± 0.100.73 ± 0.210.11 ± 0.020.56 ± 0.100.97 ± 0.36
     Kidneys19.65 ± 7.366.92 ± 1.406.10 ± 0.721.05 ± 0.076.05 ± 1.134.64 ± 0.48*
     Muscle0.43 ± 0.140.04 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.030.02 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.050.07 ± 0.06
     Pancreas0.97 ± 0.400.19 ± 0.140.44 ± 0.640.06 ± 0.030.31 ± 0.100.06 ± 0.02
     Bone1.09 ± 0.280.15 ± 0.090.19 ± 0.150.12 ± 0.070.30 ± 0.080.33 ± 0.30
     Skin3.62 ± 0.350.46 ± 0.100.37 ± 0.110.15 ± 0.050.45 ± 0.060.54 ± 0.10
    %ID
     Intestines2.43 ± 0.311.85 ± 0.513.43 ± 0.760.32 ± 0.091.85 ± 0.421.64 ± 0.40
     Urine60.22 ± 4.4688.46 ± 2.2384.47 ± 4.8096.84 ± 1.1791.29 ± 0.7088.11 ± 1.90
    T/NT
     Liver7.3420.8617.6220.051.0321.19
     Kidney1.193.293.636.780.215.57
     Lung5.7843.7744.5152.051.3944.16
     Muscle54.62527.80502.79450.6821.12392.26
     Blood7.8757.5974.6182.891.54139.85
     Skin6.4749.1359.9247.992.8247.44
    • ↵* P < 0.05 for differences in tumor and kidney uptake between 99mTc(EDDA)-HYNIC-AocNle-CycMSHhex with and without peptide blockade, and with and without L-lys coinjection at 2 h after injection.

    • T/NT = tumor–to–normal-tissue uptake ratio.

    • Two-hour data are cited from Table 2 for comparison. Data are %ID/g or %ID (mean ± SD, n = 5).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 12
December 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Introduction of an 8-Aminooctanoic Acid Linker Enhances Uptake of 99mTc-Labeled Lactam Bridge–Cyclized α-MSH Peptide in Melanoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Introduction of an 8-Aminooctanoic Acid Linker Enhances Uptake of 99mTc-Labeled Lactam Bridge–Cyclized α-MSH Peptide in Melanoma
Haixun Guo, Yubin Miao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2014, 55 (12) 2057-2063; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145896

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Introduction of an 8-Aminooctanoic Acid Linker Enhances Uptake of 99mTc-Labeled Lactam Bridge–Cyclized α-MSH Peptide in Melanoma
Haixun Guo, Yubin Miao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2014, 55 (12) 2057-2063; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145896
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Advances in Receptor-Targeted Radiolabeled Peptides for Melanoma Imaging and Therapy
  • 68Ga-DOTA-GGNle-CycMSHhex targets the melanocortin-1 receptor for melanoma imaging
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Tumor-Specific Binding of Radiolabeled PEGylated GIRLRG Peptide: A Novel Agent for Targeting Cancers
  • PET/MRI of Hypoxic Atherosclerosis Using 64Cu-ATSM in a Rabbit Model
  • Tumor Uptake of Anti-CD20 Fabs Depends on Tumor Perfusion
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone
  • 99mTc-labeled lactam bridge–cyclized peptide
  • melanoma imaging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire