Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET

Venkatesh L. Murthy, Benjamin C. Lee, Arkadiusz Sitek, Masanao Naya, Jonathan Moody, Vivek Polavarapu, Edward P. Ficaro and Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2014, 55 (12) 1952-1958; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145342
Venkatesh L. Murthy
1Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin C. Lee
3INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arkadiusz Sitek
4Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanao Naya
1Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Moody
3INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivek Polavarapu
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward P. Ficaro
2Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
3INVIA Medical Imaging Solutions, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo F. Di Carli
1Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 12
December 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET
Venkatesh L. Murthy, Benjamin C. Lee, Arkadiusz Sitek, Masanao Naya, Jonathan Moody, Vivek Polavarapu, Edward P. Ficaro, Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2014, 55 (12) 1952-1958; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison and Prognostic Validation of Multiple Methods of Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow with 82Rb PET
Venkatesh L. Murthy, Benjamin C. Lee, Arkadiusz Sitek, Masanao Naya, Jonathan Moody, Vivek Polavarapu, Edward P. Ficaro, Marcelo F. Di Carli
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2014, 55 (12) 1952-1958; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145342
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve on 82Rubidium Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis
  • Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC
  • Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations
  • Noninvasive Imaging to Evaluate Women With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
  • SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease: Correlation with Angiographic Findings and Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements
  • Approaches to Reducing Radiation Dose from Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Microvascular Angina, and Treatment Strategies
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • myocardial perfusion imaging
  • Myocardial flow reserve
  • 82Rb
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire