Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Segmentation-Based MR Attenuation Correction Including Bones Also Affects Quantitation in Brain Studies: An Initial Result of 18F-FP-CIT PET/MR for Patients with Parkinsonism

Hongyoon Choi, Gi Jeong Cheon, Han-Joon Kim, Seung Hong Choi, Jae Sung Lee, Yong-il Kim, Keon Wook Kang, June-Key Chung, E. Edmund Kim and Dong Soo Lee
Journal of Nuclear Medicine October 2014, 55 (10) 1617-1622; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.138636
Hongyoon Choi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Science, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gi Jeong Cheon
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
3Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Han-Joon Kim
4Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seung Hong Choi
5Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
6Center for Nanoparticle Research, Institute for Basic Science, and School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jae Sung Lee
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong-il Kim
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Science, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keon Wook Kang
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
3Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
June-Key Chung
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
3Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Edmund Kim
2Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Science, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
7Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dong Soo Lee
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Science, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Schematic workflow for image processing and quantification. PET scans acquired from PET/MR and PET/CT were spatially normalized to Korean Statistical Probabilistic Anatomic Mapping template. BR was calculated using statistical probabilistic maps of putamen and caudate nucleus. Interequipment agreement between PET/MR and PET/CT was calculated. VOI = volume of interest.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) DAT BR of PET/MR and PET/CT. BR of putamen calculated from PET/MR and PET/CT showed excellent interequipment agreement. ICC of BR was 0.967 (95% CI, 0.841–0.989). (B) BR of caudate nucleus calculated from PET/MR was underestimated, compared with PET/CT. ICC of BR was 0.682 (95% CI, −0.185–0.908). Bland–Altman plots show interequipment agreement in putamen (C) and caudate nucleus (D). Bland–Altman plot of caudate nucleus shows comparable variability between BR calculated from PET/MR and PET/CT, compared with putamen, which showed considerable mean difference of BR (0.23 ± 0.28 for putamen and 0.66 ± 0.33 for caudate nucleus).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    BR of PET/MR and PET/CT calculated from non-AC images. BR of putamen (A) and caudate nucleus (B) shows excellent interequipment agreement when non-AC images are applied (ICC, 0.937; 95% CI, 0.873–0.969, and ICC, 0.832; 95% CI, 0.655–0.918 for putamen and caudate nucleus, respectively).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Voxelwise comparison between PET/MR and PET/CT. Image shows underestimated voxels in PET/MR using UTE sequence–based AC, compared with PET/CT (uncorrected P < 0.001 as a threshold with an extent threshold of 100 contagious voxels).

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Representative images of UTE sequence–based AC and CT-based AC. (A) UTE sequence–based attenuation maps show misclassified voxels in lateral ventricle as air (arrow). (B) UTE images and R2 maps for tissue classification. UTE images were acquired at echo times TE1 (0.07 ms)/TE2 (2.46 ms), and R2 map is derived from 2 images after air mask. (C) CT-based attenuation map shows water attenuation in lateral ventricle. Difference in attenuation maps of PET/MR and PET/CT affects quantification of DAT BR. Numbers on attenuation map of PET/MR (A) and PET/CT (C) reveal attenuation coefficients of each region (cm−1). Representative 1-cm-sized circular regions of interest were drawn on lateral ventricle, cortical bone, and brain tissue on CT-based attenuation map. (D) Difference image in percentage BR between PET images from PET/MR and PET/CT showed underestimation in lateral ventricles. Fusion images of difference map and 18F-FP-CIT PET image showed that underestimation of BR was found in lateral ventricle, which overlapped caudate nucleus (arrowheads).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Demographic Data of All Patients

    Patient no.SexAge (y)Initial clinical assessmentVisual assessment of DAT density
    1M56Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    2M59Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    3F71Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    4M68Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    5F50Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    6F67Nonparkinsonian tremorPreserved in both striata
    7M39Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    8F68Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    9M69Parkinson diseasePreserved in both striata
    10F64Nonparkinsonian tremorPreserved in both striata
    11M54Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    12M58Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    13M54Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    14F61Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    15F65Parkinson diseaseReduced in both striata
    16F77Parkinson diseasePreserved in both striata

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 55 (10)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 55, Issue 10
October 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Segmentation-Based MR Attenuation Correction Including Bones Also Affects Quantitation in Brain Studies: An Initial Result of 18F-FP-CIT PET/MR for Patients with Parkinsonism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Segmentation-Based MR Attenuation Correction Including Bones Also Affects Quantitation in Brain Studies: An Initial Result of 18F-FP-CIT PET/MR for Patients with Parkinsonism
Hongyoon Choi, Gi Jeong Cheon, Han-Joon Kim, Seung Hong Choi, Jae Sung Lee, Yong-il Kim, Keon Wook Kang, June-Key Chung, E. Edmund Kim, Dong Soo Lee
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2014, 55 (10) 1617-1622; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138636

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Segmentation-Based MR Attenuation Correction Including Bones Also Affects Quantitation in Brain Studies: An Initial Result of 18F-FP-CIT PET/MR for Patients with Parkinsonism
Hongyoon Choi, Gi Jeong Cheon, Han-Joon Kim, Seung Hong Choi, Jae Sung Lee, Yong-il Kim, Keon Wook Kang, June-Key Chung, E. Edmund Kim, Dong Soo Lee
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Oct 2014, 55 (10) 1617-1622; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138636
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method
  • Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time MR Imaging for the Segmentation of the Skull
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Prognostic Role of 68Ga-PSMA11 PET–Based Response in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Taxane-Based Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET/MR
  • 18F-FP-CIT
  • UTE sequence
  • attenuation correction
  • brain PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire