Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy: Basic Science

Investigating optimal methods for assessing early response of head and neck cancer xenografts (HNCX) to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) using F-18 FDG-microPET-CT (PET)

Ching-yee Wong, Jiayi Huang, Mitual Amin, John Chunta, David Lee, Inga Grills, Brian Marples, Di Yan, Alvaro Martinez and George Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1722;
Ching-yee Wong
1Nuclear Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiayi Huang
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitual Amin
3Pathology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Chunta
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Lee
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inga Grills
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Marples
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Di Yan
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alvaro Martinez
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Wilson
2Radiation Oncology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1722

Objectives To investigate optimal methods to obtain parameters from PET for assessing early response of HNCX to single 15 Gy RT.

Methods Human head & neck squamous cancer cells (UT14) were injected to the flank of female nu/nu mice to generate xenografts. RT or sham (control) started at tumor size of 400-500cc, Tumor volumes were measured twice a week. At different time points after RT or sham, 2-3 mice were first assessed by PET with dynamic acquisition over 2 hrs, and then immediately acrificed to harvest tumors, which were oriented to correlate with PET image and stained with HE for histology. T-tests and ROC analysis was used to compared standard uptake value (SUV) without and with correction by glucose (SUVglc) at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min, rate constants (K1, k2, K3) and transfer constants by kinetic modeling (Ki-mod) and Patlak analysis from 0-120 min (Ki-120) and 12-70 min (Ki-70) for their ability to detect tumor growth and viability.

Results 30 mice were implanted with HNCX and 27 were successfully imaged by PET (11 control; 16 RT). Tumor growth curve for controls was linear but that for RT was arrested for the first 21 days after RT and resumed at a linear rate thereafter. Comparing to control, all time point SUVs (p<0.05), Ki-70 and Ki-mod (p<0.01) were significantly lower during the tumor-arrest phase after RT but not during the regrowth phase (p=NS). The corresponding SUVglc, K1, k2 or k3 alone and Ki-120 failed to show significant differences between control and RT in both phases. ROC analysis showed best performace of Ki-mod, Ki-70, SUV at 60 amd 90 min (p<0.04) but not others (p=NS).

Conclusions SUV without glucose correction and Ki-70 or Ki-mod appear to correlate well for tumor growth and viability. Prolonged acquisition beyond 70 minutes may not be necessary for assessing early response after RT

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Investigating optimal methods for assessing early response of head and neck cancer xenografts (HNCX) to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) using F-18 FDG-microPET-CT (PET)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Investigating optimal methods for assessing early response of head and neck cancer xenografts (HNCX) to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) using F-18 FDG-microPET-CT (PET)
Ching-yee Wong, Jiayi Huang, Mitual Amin, John Chunta, David Lee, Inga Grills, Brian Marples, Di Yan, Alvaro Martinez, George Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1722;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Investigating optimal methods for assessing early response of head and neck cancer xenografts (HNCX) to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) using F-18 FDG-microPET-CT (PET)
Ching-yee Wong, Jiayi Huang, Mitual Amin, John Chunta, David Lee, Inga Grills, Brian Marples, Di Yan, Alvaro Martinez, George Wilson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1722;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy: Basic Science

  • Modification of chemical structure to improve biodistribution of a radiolabeled sigma ligand for tumor-imaging
  • A Cy5** labelled anti-EGFR affibody selectively targets EGFR in mouse xenograft model
  • Prediction of human PET imaging dose to monitor NHL therapy using <64>Cu-DOTA-rituximab and a transgenic mouse model
Show more Oncology: Basic, Translational & Therapy: Basic Science

Basic Science Posters (Oncology)

  • Imaging adult glioma with 68Ga-citrate PET/MR
  • Evaluation of L-1-[18F]Fluoroethyl-Tryptophan for PET Imaging of Cancer
  • HER2-targeted SPECT imaging of nude mice with colon cancer xenografts using 125I-Herceptin
Show more Basic Science Posters (Oncology)

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire