Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigations

Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Antagonist Versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Agonist Binding in Human Cancers In Vitro

Renzo Cescato, Beatrice Waser, Melpomeni Fani and Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2011, 52 (12) 1886-1890; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.095778
Renzo Cescato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrice Waser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melpomeni Fani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Claude Reubi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Comparison of 177Lu-DOTATATE and 177Lu-DOTA-BASS receptor autoradiographic binding in successive sections of various types of human cancers (ileal carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, breast carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) expressing sst2. Columns from left to right represent hematoxylin and eosin staining, total and nonspecific binding of 177Lu-DOTATATE, and total and nonspecific binding of 177Lu-DOTA-BASS. Binding is markedly stronger with antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-BASS. HE = hematoxylin and eosin; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NS = nonspecific; Pheo = pheochromocytoma; RCC = renal cell carcinoma.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Quantitation of in vitro receptor autoradiography experiments with various types of human cancers (ileal carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, breast carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma) using 177Lu-DOTATATE and 177Lu-DOTA-BASS as radioligands. Shown are bar graphs of specific binding (counts/h) of radioligands to tumor sections after quantitation using InstantImager. For all tested human tumor types, antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-BASS exhibited markedly better binding behavior. NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Pheo = pheochromocytoma; RCC = renal cell carcinoma; Spec. = specific.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    sst1–sst5 Affinity Profile of 2 Somatostatin Analogs, Compared with SRIF-28 as Reference

    Compoundsst1sst2sst3sst4sst5
    SRIF-28, reference3.2 ± 0.4 (7)2.4 ± 0.2 (7)4.0 ± 1.1 (7)2.3 ± 0.5 (7)2.3 ± 0.3 (7)
    DOTATATE, agonist>1,000 (3)1.5 ± 0.4 (3)>1,000 (3)453 ± 179 (3)547 ± 160 (3)
    DOTA-BASS, antagonist>1,000 (4)1.5 ± 0.4 (4)>1,000 (4)287 ± 27 (4)>1,000 (4)
    • Data are expressed as 50% inhibitory concentration in nM (mean ± SEM).

    • Number of experiments are in parentheses.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 52 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue 12
December 1, 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Antagonist Versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Agonist Binding in Human Cancers In Vitro
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Antagonist Versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Agonist Binding in Human Cancers In Vitro
Renzo Cescato, Beatrice Waser, Melpomeni Fani, Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2011, 52 (12) 1886-1890; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095778

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Antagonist Versus 177Lu-DOTA-sst2 Agonist Binding in Human Cancers In Vitro
Renzo Cescato, Beatrice Waser, Melpomeni Fani, Jean Claude Reubi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2011, 52 (12) 1886-1890; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095778
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Emergence of Somatostatin Antagonist-Based Theranostics: Paving the Road Toward Another Success?
  • First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy
  • Phase I Trial of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Antagonist 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan
  • Somatostatin Receptor Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: From Agonists to Antagonists
  • Reply: Advantages and Limits of Targeted Radionuclide Therapy with Somatostatin Antagonists
  • SSTR-Mediated Imaging in Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists?
  • Biodistribution, Pharmacokinetics, and Dosimetry of 177Lu-, 90Y-, and 111In-Labeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist OPS201 in Comparison to the Agonist 177Lu-DOTATATE: The Mass Effect
  • Citius, Altius, Fortius: An Olympian Dream for Theranostics
  • Highly Increased 125I-JR11 Antagonist Binding In Vitro Reveals Novel Indications for sst2 Targeting in Human Cancers
  • Comparison of the Therapeutic Response to Treatment with a 177Lu-Labeled Somatostatin Receptor Agonist and Antagonist in Preclinical Models
  • The Somatostatin Analog 188Re-P2045 Inhibits the Growth of AR42J Pancreatic Tumor Xenografts
  • Comparison of Somatostatin Receptor Agonist and Antagonist for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: A Pilot Study
  • Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Proceedings of a Joint Workshop Hosted by the National Cancer Institute and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Unexpected Sensitivity of sst2 Antagonists to N-Terminal Radiometal Modifications
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire