Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

MEGP vs HEGP collimator for I-131 thyroid scintigraphy

Wesley Wooten and Tri Tran
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1388;
Wesley Wooten
1Medical Imaging Physics, Orinda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tri Tran
2UC Irvine, Orange, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1388

Objectives Thyroid Cancer patients receive scintigraphic images at intervals after treatment to determine presence and extent of residual functioning thyroid tissue or metastases. Many clinics use I-131, but lacking a High Energy Collimator have used a Medium Energy collimator and obtained reasonable quality images. We compare a MEGP collimator to a HEGP collimator for the specific task of I-131 lesion detection.

Methods 1)FWHM and FWTM were measured in air at 10 cm. 2)Penetration Fraction was measured by the method of NEMA Publication NU 1-2007(1), Section 3.3. 3)Sensitivity in air was measured. 4)A phantom was designed and built with hot cylinders of different sizes superimposed on a uniform background. Planar images with a target to background ratio of 4.5 to 1 were acquired for scan durations from 5 seconds to 640 seconds. 5)Repeated acquisitions will be added over a range of scan durations, to estimate the SNR for a Non-prewhitening Matched Filter (SNR NPW) as a function of scan duration.

Results 1)FWHM and FWTM are shown below. Septal penetration of the MEGP is reflected in the large FWTM. 2)At 10 cm, the MEGP penetration fraction was 0.58, and the HEGP penetration fraction was 0.38. 3)The MEGP collimator was 2.3 times more sensitive in total counts, and 1.6 times more sensitive for "properly collimated" counts. 4)Phantom images show that all lesions detectable with the High Energy Collimator are also detectable with the Medium Energy Collimator, for the same combination of lesion size, lesion activity, and scan duration. 5)The scan duration for each collimator will be reported which yields the same SNR NPW, which can be interpreted as the scan duration required to yield the same lesion detectability.

Conclusions For I-131 thyroid imaging, the MEGP collimator has equivalent lesion detectability compared to the HEGP

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 51, Issue supplement 2
May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MEGP vs HEGP collimator for I-131 thyroid scintigraphy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
MEGP vs HEGP collimator for I-131 thyroid scintigraphy
Wesley Wooten, Tri Tran
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1388;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MEGP vs HEGP collimator for I-131 thyroid scintigraphy
Wesley Wooten, Tri Tran
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2010, 51 (supplement 2) 1388;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

  • Quantitative beta imaging with a digital single lens reflex camera
  • Modular detector for a dedicated PET/CT breast scanner
  • Parallel readout electronics and data acquisition for SSPM-based PET detectors
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Instrumentation Posters

  • Feasibility of Low-Dose18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Patients using SiPM-based Detector PET: Quantitative and Qualitative Image Evaluation
  • Image quality of brain SPECT recorded with the whole-body Veriton CZT camera and a focal brain configuration of detectors, as compared with conventional SPECT and PET systems
  • Initial clinical experience with rapid high definition Na18F digital photon counting PET/CT imaging for whole-body osteoblastic disease assessment
Show more Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire