Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Quantitative beta imaging with a digital single lens reflex camera

Hector Valdovinos, Jonathan Engle, Todd Barnhart, Greg Severin, Edward Wunder and Robert Nickles
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1970;
Hector Valdovinos
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Engle
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd Barnhart
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Severin
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Wunder
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Nickles
1Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1970

Objectives To image the spatial distribution of beta (+/-) emitters in vitro using various contact scintillators viewed with a digital SLR.

Methods A modern digital SLR camera (Pentax K-x; Sigma EX macro lens) was through-mounted into a small dark box, focused onto a thin (2 mm) scintillator in contact with the beta-emitting source, e.g. a thin layer chromatograph (TLC) plate, mounted on a rotating stage. A 1P28 photomultiplier (PM) tube in the current mode acts as a light meter, and a switched lamp provides light field registration. Five scintillator materials were evaluated, as well as Cerenkov emission from various stopping media. Submillimeter spatial resolution was achieved, with exposure factors (ISO and time) scaled by the PM current. The relative light output [PM nanoAmps] varies ten-fold; CsI(Tl) > EJ212 > EJ260 (green) > Meltelex, and hundred-fold over Cerenkov for both F-18 and Cu-64. Recognizing that the PM and SLR have differing spectral sensitivity, at f=2.8, ISO 12,800, a 1 mCi, 7 mm diam spot of F-18 is well-imaged in ≈ 1 sec. The digital images are transferred to ImageJ running on an iMac, for quantitation as TLC profiles or regions of interest.

Results This SLR-based device must stand an honest comparison against other bench-top beta scanners and phosphor-plate systems in terms of dynamic range, signal/noise, versatility, simplicity, cost and regulatory compliance. The phosphor plate image storage device is the clear winner in sub-nCi applications, while a good beta scanner is favored by regulatory authorities. This SLR device gains its strength from its simplicity and immediate readout by image free ware. The rotating source capability allows 3-dimensional imaging, such as the location of residual activity on the inner surfaces of reaction glassware, immersed in liquid scintillation fluid.

Conclusions The SLR beta imaging device fills a niche in the nuclear research laboratory, where the spatial distribution of a planar beta source must be quickly determined, to guide the subsequent synthesis.

Research Support NIH/NCI T32 CA0920

Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 52, Issue supplement 1
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantitative beta imaging with a digital single lens reflex camera
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Quantitative beta imaging with a digital single lens reflex camera
Hector Valdovinos, Jonathan Engle, Todd Barnhart, Greg Severin, Edward Wunder, Robert Nickles
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1970;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Quantitative beta imaging with a digital single lens reflex camera
Hector Valdovinos, Jonathan Engle, Todd Barnhart, Greg Severin, Edward Wunder, Robert Nickles
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2011, 52 (supplement 1) 1970;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

  • Modular detector for a dedicated PET/CT breast scanner
  • Parallel readout electronics and data acquisition for SSPM-based PET detectors
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Instrumentation

Instrumentation Posters

  • Feasibility of Low-Dose18F-FDG PET in Pediatric Patients using SiPM-based Detector PET: Quantitative and Qualitative Image Evaluation
  • Image quality of brain SPECT recorded with the whole-body Veriton CZT camera and a focal brain configuration of detectors, as compared with conventional SPECT and PET systems
  • Initial clinical experience with rapid high definition Na18F digital photon counting PET/CT imaging for whole-body osteoblastic disease assessment
Show more Instrumentation Posters

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire