Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

PET Imaging of Serotonin Transporters with [11C]DASB: Test–Retest Reproducibility Using a Multilinear Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Method

Jae Seung Kim, Masanori Ichise, Janet Sangare and Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2006, 47 (2) 208-214;
Jae Seung Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanori Ichise
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet Sangare
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert B. Innis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Test (left column) and retest (right column) parametric images of BP (top row) and R1 (bottom row) of a representative subject. Th = thalamus; Ra = raphe; Hyp = hypothalamus; Cg = cingulate gyrus.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    MRI superimposed with t-statistic maps obtained from SPM comparing test and retest studies using height threshold of uncorrected P = 0.05 and extent threshold of 100 voxels. (A) t-statistic maps comparing BP values of test and retest (test > retest). (B) t-statistic maps comparing R1 values of test and retest (test < retest).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Summary of Test and Retest Embedded Image Estimation

    k′2 (min−1)*
    Subject no.Age (y)SexTestRetest% difference
    141M0.0490.0526.6
    241F0.0670.0739.5
    321M0.0660.066−0.1
    420M0.0550.0585.4
    522F0.0820.076−7.1
    624F0.0790.077−3.0
    723F0.0790.079−0.6
    819F0.0510.0569.7
    Mean ± SD26 ± 90.066 ± 0.0130.067 ± 0.0112.5 ± 6.2
    • ↵* Mean Embedded Image value estimated with MRTM model on thalamus, striatum, and raphe time–activity curve with cerebellum as a reference region.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Test–Retest Bias, Variability, and Reliability of BP Estimated by MRTM2 Parametric Imaging Method

    BP (mean ± SD; n = 8)
    RegionTestRetestBias (%)Variability (%)Reliability (ρ)
    Striatum1.38 ± 0.181.31 ± 0.14−4.84.50.83
    Thalamus2.10 ± 0.341.94 ± 0.31−7.54.10.85
    Raphe3.24 ± 0.273.00 ± 0.20−7.04.80.45
    Frontal cortex0.41 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.03−6.98.70.44
    Temporal cortex0.58 ± 0.130.56 ± 0.11−2.58.90.85
    Occipital cortex0.39 ± 0.110.37 ± 0.08−4.312.80.83
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Test–Retest Bias, Variability, and Reliability of R1 Estimated by MRTM2 Parametric Imaging Method

    R1 (mean ± SD; n = 8)
    RegionTestRetestBias (%)Variability (%)Reliability (ρ)
    Striatum1.03 ± 0.071.02 ± 0.07−0.92.50.92
    Thalamus1.03 ± 0.081.02 ± 0.06−0.86.10.62
    Raphe0.77 ± 0.080.76 ± 0.05−0.95.70.73
    Frontal cortex0.97 ± 0.110.97 ± 0.11−0.63.50.95
    Temporal cortex0.71 ± 0.050.71 ± 0.070.04.30.87
    Occipital cortex1.00 ± 0.061.03 ± 0.083.06.40.58
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Test–Retest Bias, Variability, and Reliability of BP Estimated by ROI Time–Activity Curve-Fitting Method

    BP (mean ± SD; n = 8)
    RegionTestRetestBias (%)Variability (%)Reliability (ρ)
    Striatum1.38 ± 0.191.32 ± 0.16−4.33.70.89
    Thalamus2.04 ± 0.341.88 ± 0.30−7.54.60.84
    Raphe3.16 ± 0.262.93 ± 0.19−7.05.30.39
    Frontal cortex0.40 ± 0.060.37 ± 0.03−6.88.00.55
    Temporal cortex0.53 ± 0.130.51 ± 0.10−2.79.70.82
    Occipital cortex0.39 ± 0.120.36 ± 0.09−4.513.20.85
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Test–Retest Bias, Variability, and Reliability of R1 Estimated by ROI Time–Activity Curve-Fitting Method

    R1 (mean ± SD; n = 8)
    RegionTestRetestBias (%)Variability (%)Reliability (ρ)
    Striatum1.03 ± 0.071.02 ± 0.07−1.12.90.89
    Thalamus1.03 ± 0.081.01 ± 0.06−1.06.30.55
    Raphe0.77 ± 0.080.76 ± 0.04−1.06.30.67
    Frontal cortex0.96 ± 0.110.96 ± 0.11−0.73.20.96
    Temporal cortex0.69 ± 0.050.69 ± 0.060.04.60.85
    Occipital cortex1.00 ± 0.071.02 ± 0.082.86.50.60
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 47 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 47, Issue 2
February 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PET Imaging of Serotonin Transporters with [11C]DASB: Test–Retest Reproducibility Using a Multilinear Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
PET Imaging of Serotonin Transporters with [11C]DASB: Test–Retest Reproducibility Using a Multilinear Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Method
Jae Seung Kim, Masanori Ichise, Janet Sangare, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2006, 47 (2) 208-214;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PET Imaging of Serotonin Transporters with [11C]DASB: Test–Retest Reproducibility Using a Multilinear Reference Tissue Parametric Imaging Method
Jae Seung Kim, Masanori Ichise, Janet Sangare, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2006, 47 (2) 208-214;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Test-Retest Reliability of the SERT Imaging Agent 11C-HOMADAM in Healthy Humans
  • In Vivo Evaluation of 11C-DASB for Quantitative SERT Imaging in Rats and Mice
  • PET Imaging of High-Affinity {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Humans with 18F-AZAN, a Radioligand with Optimal Brain Kinetics
  • The 5-HT1A receptor and 5-HT transporter in temporal lobe epilepsy
  • 11C-Dihydrotetrabenazine PET of the Pancreas in Subjects with Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes and in Healthy Controls
  • Test Retest Reproducibility of 18F-MPPF PET in Healthy Humans: A Reliability Study
  • Imaging the serotonin transporter during major depressive disorder and antidepressant treatment: 2005 CCNP Young Investigator Award Paper
  • Effects of early life stress on [11C]DASB positron emission tomography imaging of serotonin transporters in adolescent peer- and mother-reared rhesus monkeys.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence–Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire