Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Motion Artifact Reduction on Parametric PET Images of Neuroreceptor Binding

Hans Herzog, Lutz Tellmann, Roger Fulton, Isabelle Stangier, Elena Rota Kops, Kay Bente, Christian Boy, Rene Hurlemann and Uwe Pietrzyk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2005, 46 (6) 1059-1065;
Hans Herzog
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lutz Tellmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Fulton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Stangier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Rota Kops
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kay Bente
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Boy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rene Hurlemann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Pietrzyk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Motion recordings of subject D (black) and subject E (gray) with 2 different extents of z-shift. Movements become worse at end of scan. Rot. = rotation around.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Summed images (sagittal view, 60 min) of cerebral distribution of 18F-altanserin in subject E before and after motion correction, corresponding DVR images in sagittal and transverse orientations, and DV images in transverse view.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Cortical and cerebellar (cereb.) time–activity curves for subject E before and after motion correction. The different cerebellar time–activity curves were obtained by defining their VOIs in 2 different ways, as described in the text.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    DVR (A and B) and BP (C and D) images obtained via noninvasive Logan plot and noninvasive Ichise-MRTM2 plot, respectively, before (A and C) and after (B and D) motion correction. These data were measured in subject D.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    (A and B) Comparison of DVR images in subject A before (A) and after (B) motion correction. Discontinuities and single spots in uncorrected data are indicated by arrows. On corrected images, gradual changes are found where artifacts are visible in uncorrected data. (C) Profiles belonging to dotted white line crossing temporal lobe. (D) Profiles crossing single light spot, which is indicated by dotted arrow, in vertical direction.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    DVR images based on simulated dynamic 18F-altanserin study free from counting-rate noise: motion-free data (A); data with motion conditions SM1 (B), SM2 (C), SM3 (D), and SM4 (E).

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    (A and B) Single voxels defined in brain area ranging from gray matter (GM) to white matter (WM) (A) and corresponding time–activity curves (B) of GM, WM, and mixed tissue (WMGM) voxels superimposed on simulated dynamic 18F-altanserin images with and without motion. Time–activity curves of WM for data with and without motion overlap completely. (C) DV values resulting from Logan plot analysis of time–activity curves for data with and without motion.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Maximum Translations and Rotations

    SubjectTranslation (mm)Rotation (degrees)
    x-axisy-axisz-axisx-axisy-axisz-axis
    A−2.6−2.42.52.3−0.7−0.9
    B1.72.3−2.02.7−1.00.6
    C1.3−2.0−2.6−1.00.40.2
    D1.2−2.86.02.81.1−0.4
    E2.3−3.019.7−2.2−2.72.2
    F−2.0−2.62.6−3.31.5−0.4
    • z-axis is subject’s longitudinal axis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 6
June 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Motion Artifact Reduction on Parametric PET Images of Neuroreceptor Binding
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Motion Artifact Reduction on Parametric PET Images of Neuroreceptor Binding
Hans Herzog, Lutz Tellmann, Roger Fulton, Isabelle Stangier, Elena Rota Kops, Kay Bente, Christian Boy, Rene Hurlemann, Uwe Pietrzyk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2005, 46 (6) 1059-1065;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Motion Artifact Reduction on Parametric PET Images of Neuroreceptor Binding
Hans Herzog, Lutz Tellmann, Roger Fulton, Isabelle Stangier, Elena Rota Kops, Kay Bente, Christian Boy, Rene Hurlemann, Uwe Pietrzyk
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2005, 46 (6) 1059-1065;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
  • Assessment of Motion Bias on the Detection of Dopamine Response to Challenge
  • An Efficient Approach to Perform MR-Assisted PET Data Optimization in Simultaneous PET/MR Neuroimaging Studies
  • Test-Retest Reliability of the SERT Imaging Agent 11C-HOMADAM in Healthy Humans
  • PET/MRI for Neurologic Applications
  • Methods for Motion Correction Evaluation Using 18F-FDG Human Brain Scans on a High-Resolution PET Scanner
  • Effect of Patient Arm Motion in Whole-Body PET/CT
  • MRI-Assisted PET Motion Correction for Neurologic Studies in an Integrated MR-PET Scanner
  • Establishment of In Vivo Brain Imaging Method in Conscious Mice
  • Movement Correction Method for Human Brain PET Images: Application to Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic 18F-FDDNP Scans
  • Correction of Head Movement on PET Studies: Comparison of Methods
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
  • Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire