Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherClinical Investigations

Potential of Dual-Time-Point Imaging to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET

Rakesh Kumar, Vilert A. Loving, Anil Chauhan, Hongming Zhuang, Schnall Mitchell and Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2005, 46 (11) 1819-1824;
Rakesh Kumar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vilert A. Loving
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anil Chauhan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongming Zhuang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Schnall Mitchell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    ROC curve for percent change in average SUVs.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Single- and Dual-Time-Point Imaging SUVs in Patients with Malignant Lesions

    SampleAverage SUV at time:% Change in average SUVHistopathologic findingsTumor gradeSize (cm)
    12
    11.21.416.7IDCLow0.2
    21.51.713.3IDCHigh1.5
    30.70.70IDC + ILCModerate3.5
    40.60.716.7IDCNot known1.0
    51.10.9−18.2IDCModerate0.2
    63.03.310.0IDCHigh2.0
    72.12.39.5IDCModerate2.4
    82.12.24.8IDC + ILCLow4.0
    91.41.614.3IDCModerate0.5
    101.92.321.1IDCHighNot known
    111.81.95.6ILC + IDCModerate1.5
    120.80.912.5IDCLowNot known
    137.49.123.0IDCHighNot known
    142.32.58.7IDCModerate2.9
    151.82.011.1IDCModerate1.9
    160.90.90IDCModerate1.6
    172.02.315.0IDCLow3.5
    182.73.529.6IDC + ILCHigh2.4
    190.60.833.3IDCLow1.6
    2011.715.734.2IDCHigh2.6
    210.70.814.3IDCLow1.4
    222.93.210.3IDCModerate2.1
    2315.320.030.7IDCHigh2.8
    245.75.93.5IDCHigh1.9
    250.70.70IDC + ILCLow0.3
    266.06.915.0Medullary carcinomaHigh1.8
    275.25.811.5IDCModerate2.5
    282.22.49.1IDCHigh2.2
    291.51.713.3IDCModerate1.2
    300.40.40IDCModerate0.4
    312.52.64.0IDCHigh0.5
    322.52.78.0IDCLowNot known
    331.71.911.8IDC + ILCLowNot known
    341.41.721.4IDCModerate0.9
    350.81.025IDCHighNot known
    362.73.633.3IDCModerate1.0
    376.27.724.2IDCModerate4.0
    383.03.26.7IDCModerateNot known
    393.33.0−9.1AdenocarcinomaNot knownNot known
    Mean2.883.3812.7
    SD3.043.9811.4
    • IDC = invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC = invasive lobular carcinoma.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Single- and Dual-Time-Point Imaging SUVs in Patients with Postbiopsy Inflammation

    SampleAverage SUV at time:% Change in average SUVHistopathologic findings
    12
    11.71.4−0.176No tumor, Bx Rx +
    21.10.8−0.273Benign, Bx Rx +
    31.51.90.267No tumor, Bx Rx +, Ch Inf
    41.31.1−0.154No tumor, Bx Rx +
    51.00.7−0.300No tumor
    61.31.2−0.077No tumor, Bx Rx +
    71.00.8−0.200No tumor, Bx Rx +
    81.01.10.100Bx Rx +, proliferative fibroblasts
    91.61.60No tumor, Bx Rx +
    101.51.3−0.133No tumor, Bx Rx +
    111.00.8−0.200No tumor, Bx Rx +
    120.80.6−0.250No tumor, Bx Rx +
    131.41.3−0.071No tumor, Bx Rx +
    141.51.4−0.067Benign, Bx Rx +
    152.01.9−0.050No tumor, Bx Rx +
    161.51.50No tumor, Bx Rx +
    171.51.70.133Bx Rx, foreign-body giant-cell reaction
    180.50.3−0.400No tumor, Bx Rx +
    Mean1.291.19−0.103
    SD0.360.450.166
    • Bx Rx = biopsy reaction; Ch Inf = chronic inflammation.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 46 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 46, Issue 11
November 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potential of Dual-Time-Point Imaging to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Potential of Dual-Time-Point Imaging to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET
Rakesh Kumar, Vilert A. Loving, Anil Chauhan, Hongming Zhuang, Schnall Mitchell, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2005, 46 (11) 1819-1824;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Potential of Dual-Time-Point Imaging to Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET
Rakesh Kumar, Vilert A. Loving, Anil Chauhan, Hongming Zhuang, Schnall Mitchell, Abass Alavi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2005, 46 (11) 1819-1824;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • THIS MONTH IN JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PET/MRI Versus PET/CT for Whole-Body Staging
  • Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of a Digital PET Prototype in Patients with Oncologic Diseases: Initial Experience and Comparison with Analog PET
  • Performance of Whole-Body Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in Comparison to PET/CT for Evaluation of Malignant Bone Lesions
  • First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses
  • The value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients
  • PET Tumor Metabolism in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Value of Static versus Kinetic Measures of Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake
  • Diagnostic accuracy of fused positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance mammography: initial results
  • Prospective Evaluation of Whole-Body Cancer Screening With Multiple Modalities Including [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in a Healthy Population: A Preliminary Report
  • Time and Again, Children Resemble Their Parents
  • Evaluation of Dual-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET for Staging in Patients with Lung Cancer
  • Whole-body PET/CT-mammography for staging breast cancer: initial results
  • Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography
  • FDG-PET/CT in restaging of patients with recurrent breast cancer: possible impact on staging and therapy
  • Metabolic Imaging by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Imaging for In vivo Tumor Diagnosis.
  • 18F-FDG PET After Radiofrequency Ablation: Is Timing Everything?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire