Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
OtherBasic Science Investigations

Calculating the Absorbed Dose from Radioactive Patients: The Line-Source Versus Point-Source Model

Jeffry A. Siegel, Carol S. Marcus and Richard B. Sparks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine September 2002, 43 (9) 1241-1244;
Jeffry A. Siegel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol S. Marcus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard B. Sparks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Ratios of Line-Source Values to Point-Source Values as Function of Line-Source Length and Distance

    Distance (cm)Ratio
    ℓ = 20 cmℓ = 50 cmℓ = 70 cmℓ = 100 cmℓ = 174 cm
    10.1470.0610.0440.0310.018
    50.5540.2750.2040.1470.087
    100.7850.4760.3690.2750.167
    150.8820.6180.5000.3840.241
    200.9270.7170.6010.4760.309
    250.9510.7850.6790.5540.371
    300.9650.8340.7390.6180.427
    350.9740.8680.7850.6720.478
    400.9800.8940.8220.7170.524
    450.9840.9130.8500.7540.566
    500.9870.9270.8720.7850.603
    550.9890.9390.8910.8120.637
    600.9910.9470.9050.8340.667
    650.9920.9550.9170.8520.694
    700.9930.9600.9270.8680.719
    750.9940.9650.9360.8820.741
    800.9950.9690.9430.8940.761
    850.9950.9730.9490.9040.779
    900.9960.9750.9540.9130.795
    950.9960.9780.9580.9210.810
    1000.9970.9800.9620.9270.823
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Radionuclide-Independent Conversion Factors

    Distance (cm)Conversion factor (cm−2)
    ℓ = 20 cmℓ = 50 cmℓ = 70 cmℓ = 100 cmℓ = 174 cm
    11.47E-016.12E-024.41E-023.10E-021.79E-02
    52.21E-021.10E-028.17E-035.88E-033.48E-03
    107.85E-034.76E-033.69E-032.75E-031.67E-03
    153.92E-032.75E-032.22E-031.71E-031.07E-03
    202.32E-031.79E-031.50E-031.19E-037.73E-04
    251.52E-031.26E-031.09E-038.86E-045.94E-04
    301.07E-039.26E-048.21E-046.87E-044.75E-04
    357.95E-047.09E-046.41E-045.49E-043.90E-04
    406.12E-045.59E-045.13E-044.48E-043.28E-04
    454.86E-044.51E-044.20E-043.72E-042.79E-04
    503.95E-043.71E-043.49E-043.14E-042.41E-04
    553.27E-043.10E-042.94E-042.68E-042.10E-04
    602.75E-042.63E-042.51E-042.32E-041.85E-04
    652.35E-042.26E-042.17E-042.02E-041.64E-04
    702.03E-041.96E-041.89E-041.77E-041.47E-04
    751.77E-041.72E-041.66E-041.57E-041.32E-04
    801.55E-041.51E-041.47E-041.40E-041.19E-04
    851.38E-041.35E-041.31E-041.25E-041.08E-04
    901.23E-041.20E-041.18E-041.13E-049.81E-05
    951.10E-041.08E-041.06E-041.02E-048.97E-05
    1009.97E-059.80E-059.62E-059.27E-058.23E-05
    • Multiplication of these factors by appropriate exposure rate constant will result in dose rate per unit activity at that distance, uncorrected for patient attenuation and scatter.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 43, Issue 9
September 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Calculating the Absorbed Dose from Radioactive Patients: The Line-Source Versus Point-Source Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Calculating the Absorbed Dose from Radioactive Patients: The Line-Source Versus Point-Source Model
Jeffry A. Siegel, Carol S. Marcus, Richard B. Sparks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2002, 43 (9) 1241-1244;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Calculating the Absorbed Dose from Radioactive Patients: The Line-Source Versus Point-Source Model
Jeffry A. Siegel, Carol S. Marcus, Richard B. Sparks
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2002, 43 (9) 1241-1244;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Use of a Voxel Phantom as a Source and a Second Voxel Phantom as a Target to Calculate Effective Doses in Individuals Exposed to Patients Treated with 131I
  • Posttherapy Radiation Safety Considerations in Radiomicrosphere Treatment with 90Y-Microspheres
  • Radioimmunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with 90Y-DOTA Humanized Anti-CD22 IgG (90Y-Epratuzumab): Do Tumor Targeting and Dosimetry Predict Therapeutic Response?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 11C-Methionine PET of Myocardial Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis
  • Counting Rate Characteristics and Image Distortion in Preclinical PET Imaging During Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • Design and Fabrication of Kidney Phantoms for Internal Radiation Dosimetry Using 3D Printing Technology
Show more Basic Science Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire