Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

A comparison of image quality with uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner

Zilin Deng, Debin Hu, Yu Ding and Yun Dong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 381;
Zilin Deng
1Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
2Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debin Hu
1Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
2Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Ding
1Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
2Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun Dong
3Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd. Shanghai China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

381

Objectives: The uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner which are produced by Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare are both based on the SiPM detectors. The former PETCT system has a transaxial and axial FoV of 700 mm and 300 mm. In the uEXPLORER scanner, the transaxial FoV is the same as uMI780, but it has a much longer axial FoV, reaching 1940 mm. It will provide extremely high sensitivity for clinical imaging and scientific research. Here, we characterize the image quality compared with uMI780 and the uEXPLORER scanner.

Methods: In the following study, the acquisition time was extended to eliminate the effect of the decay of 18F. First, we used a uniform phantom (150 mm × 2000 mm) filled with 18F to study the noise performance in two scanners. A single-bed scan (2.5mins) and a multi-bed (9 beds, 17s per bed) scan with overlap 32% was performed with uMI780. Following, the data was acquired for 2.5 minutes in uEXPLORER. The images were reconstructed with all physics corrections for further noise analysis. Then the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) with iterations was evaluated with various axial position and acquisition time for the uEXPLORER and uMI780. The phantoms and scanning protocol were prepared according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2012 standard. The clinical benefit of uEXPLORER was further assessed with a 65 kg, 61 years old male volunteer. The volunteer was injected with 7.85 mCi FDG, and first scanned with uMI780 (2 mins/bed, 8 beds) and then scanned for about 16 minutes in uEXPLORER after 60-min rest. The common reconstruction parameters including subsets = 20, reconstruction matrix = 256×256, reconstructed FoV = 600 mm were used in all the mentioned study.

Results: Fig. 1 gives the uniform phantom and noise evaluation with uMI780 and uEXPLORER. It is obvious that the uEXPLORER has a 5.5-fold reduction in the noise compared to multi-bed scanning and 1.5-fold reduction compared to single bed scanning with uMI780 at the center plane of axial FoV. This means the uEXPLORER can support clinical images with a more than 25-fold sensitivity gain than a multi-bed scan with uMI780. Fig. 2 suggests that the CRC is consistent along the axial FoV and over different acquisition time. This demonstrates that the uEXPLORER can provide the uniform lesion detection ability along axial FoV. Compared with uMI780, uEXPLORER has a higher CRC over all the iterations for all the hot spheres. For comparison, the reconstructed images of the volunteer for scanning with uMI780 and uEXPLORER, are shown in Fig. 3. Obviously, the uEXPLORER provides a significant reduction in the noise standard deviation compared with a multi-bed scan with uMI780.

Conclusions: The uEXPLORER scanner can be able to provide clinical images with low noise standard deviation, high contrast, and uniform lesion detection ability along the whole axial FoV.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 60, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A comparison of image quality with uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
A comparison of image quality with uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner
Zilin Deng, Debin Hu, Yu Ding, Yun Dong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 381;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A comparison of image quality with uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner
Zilin Deng, Debin Hu, Yu Ding, Yun Dong
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2019, 60 (supplement 1) 381;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

  • Keel-Edge Height Selection for Improved Multi-Pinhole 123I Brain SPECT Imaging
  • Ultra-Fast Reconstruction of Short List-Mode PET Data Frames for Real-Time Visualization and Processing
  • Deep Learning Based 3D Dose Estimation from Prompt Gamma Distribution for Proton Therapy Monitoring
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences

Instrumentation: Image Quality and Quantitative Imaging

  • The image quality evaluation with various maximum unit difference of the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner
  • Use of a PACS Integrated Injection Monitoring Device to Increase Injection Quality and Infiltration Awareness
Show more Instrumentation: Image Quality and Quantitative Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire