Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Ideal observers from a visual-search paradigm: localization tasks and performance figures of merit

Howard Gifford
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 704;
Howard Gifford
1University of Houston Houston TX United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

704

Objectives: The channelized Hotelling (CH) observer is an ideal linear observer for fixed-location lesion detection. When applied in scanning mode for search tasks, the CH observer is tractable but also suboptimal and computationally expensive. We report on an alternative search-capable observer that is both optimal and efficient.

Methods: A free-response detection task employed a binary Hotelling discriminant constructed from extracted feature values at lesion-present and lesion-absent locations in a set of images. These locations resulted from a simulated visual-search (VS) process that identified local maxima in a specified set of feature maps. The search sensitivity can be adjusted with a lower threshold on the accepted maxima; herein, the threshold was 70% of the image maximum for each search feature. Our tested features were gradient and difference-of-Gaussian channels commonly used with the CH observer. Optimal classification performance was quantified by the Hotelling SNR [1] and then converted to an equivalent area under the ROC curve. Observer performance in the free-response study was compared with the performance in a conventional localization ROC (LROC) study where the task was to identify the maximally suspicious location in each image. These studies used sets of clinical Tc-99m SPECT lung images containing synthetic nodules. Four iterative reconstruction strategies were devised with different combinations of attenuation, scatter and resolution correction. For each strategy, RBI-EM [2] reconstructed volumes were generated for 15 pairings of iterations and Gaussian postfilter levels. The studies used 154 2D image slices (54 training and 108 test images) extracted from the volumes, with an equal number of lesion-absent and single-lesion-present cases. LROC data acquired from three lay human observers for a subset of the image sets were included in our analysis.

Results: The correlation coefficients between the model-observer LROC and free-response performances for the four reconstruction strategies ranged from 0.85 to 0.97. Agreement between the model and average human in the LROC study could be modified by adjusting the former’s search sensitivity.

Conclusion: Anthropomorphic model observers can be devised by applying thresholds within the VS framework of this ideal observer. The ideal model thus provides a theoretical basis for VS observers that have been recently proposed [3] as surrogates for human observers in clinically realistic diagnostic imaging tasks. Research Support: This work was supported in part by NIBIB grant R01-EB012070.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 58, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ideal observers from a visual-search paradigm: localization tasks and performance figures of merit
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Ideal observers from a visual-search paradigm: localization tasks and performance figures of merit
Howard Gifford
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 704;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ideal observers from a visual-search paradigm: localization tasks and performance figures of merit
Howard Gifford
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2017, 58 (supplement 1) 704;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

  • Deep Learning Based Kidney Segmentation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement Using Quantitative SPECT/CT
  • Comparison of 22 partial volume correction methods for amyloid PET imaging with 11C-PiB
  • The Benefit of Time-of-Flight in Digital Photon Counting PET Imaging: Physics and Clinical Evaluation
Show more Instrumentation & Data Analysis Track

Quantification, Image Reconstruction and Methodologies in Nuclear Medicine

  • A Viewer for Dynamic Whole Body PET/CT Studies
  • Bias-variance tradeoff of indirect versus direct parametric reconstruction for PET myocardial perfusion imaging
Show more Quantification, Image Reconstruction and Methodologies in Nuclear Medicine

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire