Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction

Ashish Panse, Ranjith Mukkai Ramchandra, Tianyu Ma, Jianhua Yan, Richard Carson and Rutao Yao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 468;
Ashish Panse
1Univ at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ranjith Mukkai Ramchandra
1Univ at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tianyu Ma
2Tsinghua Univ, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianhua Yan
3Yale Univ, New Haven, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Carson
3Yale Univ, New Haven, CT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rutao Yao
1Univ at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

468

Objectives To achieve optimal HRRT listmode reconstruction,we developed a method to derive a component-based system matrix which was implemented as a large table of point spread functions (PSF) [1]. The purpose of this study is to parameterize the system matrix to allow finer sampling of the components involved without increasing the size and statistical requirement of system matrix.

Methods With the component based method, the conventional voxel and line-of-response (LOR) indices for retrieving a system matrix element were replaced by physical components that critically affect the magnitude of system matrix elements: detector layer (L), photon-to-crystal incident angles (AX and TX), voxel relative location along LOR (D) and in the plane perpendicular to the LOR (R and U). To parameterize the matrix, the PSF of each voxel-LOR group, i.e. the combination (L, AX, TX and D), was fit to a 3D elliptic function in terms of 3 parameters: obliqueness angle and the sizes of the major and minor axes. These parameters were then used for extrapolating the PSFs with fine samples in incident angles and location along LOR. We used a Monte Carlo simulated uniform cylinder for PSF derivation and a hot-rod phantom for evaluating the performance of the parameterized matrix.

Results The component based system matrix provided images with higher resolution and lower noise as compared to using iso-Gaussian PSF. The parameters of the elliptical PSF model showed consistent trends over the LOR incident angles and the voxel location along LOR.

Conclusions We developed a technique to obtain parameterized system matrix. It allowed using finely sampled system matrix with dramatically reduced computer memory requirements.

Research Support This work was supported by NIH grant 1R01NS058360-01A1.

  • © 2009 by Society of Nuclear Medicine
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 50, Issue supplement 2
May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
Ashish Panse, Ranjith Mukkai Ramchandra, Tianyu Ma, Jianhua Yan, Richard Carson, Rutao Yao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 468;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
System matrix parameterization for HRRT reconstruction
Ashish Panse, Ranjith Mukkai Ramchandra, Tianyu Ma, Jianhua Yan, Richard Carson, Rutao Yao
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2009, 50 (supplement 2) 468;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

  • Optimization of 15O-water activation studies in PET/CT
  • A simple and fast system calibration method for MR-compatible OctoSPECT
  • Accuracy of absolute activities recovered by three commercial SPECT-CT reconstruction packages using different quantitation techniques
Show more Instrumentation and Data Analysis: Image Generation

PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

  • Reproducibility of SUVmax in serial PET studies
  • Does resolution modeling during reconstruction improve the DAT measurement on a high resolution PET?
Show more PET-Reconstruction, Optimization and Evaluation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire