Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleCLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Usefulness of Standardized Uptake Values for Distinguishing Adrenal Glands with Pheochromocytoma from Normal Adrenal Glands by Use of 6-18F-Fluorodopamine PET

Henri J.L.M. Timmers, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Millie Whatley, Graeme Eisenhofer, Clara C. Chen, Alexander Ling, W. Marston Linehan, Peter A. Pinto, Karen T. Adams and Karel Pacak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine December 2007, 48 (12) 1940-1944; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.043281
Henri J.L.M. Timmers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jorge A. Carrasquillo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Millie Whatley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme Eisenhofer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clara C. Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Ling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Marston Linehan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter A. Pinto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen T. Adams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karel Pacak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

6-18F-Fluorodopamine (18F-FDA) PET is a highly sensitive tool for the localization of pheochromocytoma (PHEO). The aim of this study was to establish cutoff values for pathologic and physiologic adrenal gland tracer uptake. Methods: 18F-FDA PET with CT coregistration was performed in 14 patients (10 men and 4 women; age [mean ± SD], 42.9 ± 13.3 y) with unilateral adrenal gland PHEO and in 13 control subjects (5 men and 8 women; age, 51.7 ± 12.5 y) without PHEO. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were compared between adrenal glands with PHEO and normal left adrenal glands in control subjects. Results: 18F-FDA accumulation was observed in all adrenal glands with PHEO and in 6 of 13 control adrenal glands (P = 0.02). The SUV was higher in adrenal glands with PHEO (mean ± SD, 16.1 ± 6.1) than in 18F-FDA–positive control adrenal glands (7.7 ± 1.4) (P = 0.005). SUV cutoffs for distinguishing between adrenal glands with PHEO and normal adrenal glands were 7.3 (100% sensitivity) and 10.1 (100% specificity). Conclusion: The SUVs of adrenal foci on 18F-FDA PET facilitate the distinction between adrenal glands with PHEO and normal adrenal glands.

  • 6-18F-fluorodopamine
  • pheochromocytoma
  • paraganglioma
  • PET

Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are rare catecholamine-producing tumors of the adrenal medulla (1,2). The diagnosis of PHEO can be reliably confirmed or excluded by the biochemical parameter of catecholamine excess, in particular, fractionated metanephrines in urine or plasma (3). The localization of PHEO usually requires both anatomic and functional imaging studies. Agents that specifically target the catecholamine storage and secretion pathways include 123I/131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine and 6-18F-fluorodopamine (18F-FDA) (4,5). In our experience, 18F-FDA PET is a highly sensitive tool for localizing PHEO (4,6) but may lead to false-positive results because of physiologic uptake by normal adrenal glands. This uptake can be particularly misleading in patients who are prone to bilateral PHEOs because of underlying genetic abnormalities (7,8).

The aim of this study was to establish cutoff values for pathologic and physiologic adrenal gland tracer uptake for 18F-FDA PET. For this purpose, the distributions of 18F-FDA in adrenal glands and other tissues in patients with benign PHEO and control subjects without PHEO were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

A total of 104 consecutive patients were referred for known or suspected PHEO and underwent 18F-FDA PET/CT between March 2005 and June 2006. After exclusion of patients with extraadrenal or metastatic PHEO, 14 patients (10 men and 4 women; age [mean ± SD], 42.9 ± 13.3 y) with histologically confirmed adrenal gland PHEO were studied. Underlying genotypes are indicated in Table 1. The control group consisted of 13 subjects (5 men and 8 women; age, 51.7 ± 12.5 y). Reasons for PHEO evaluation are indicated in Table 1. In all control subjects, PHEO was ruled out by normal plasma free metanephrine levels and clinical follow-up (3). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institutes of Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health. All patients provided written informed consent.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Adrenal Imaging Results

18F-FDA PET

18F-FDA PET was performed as previously described (9) with a Discovery ST PET/CT scanner (GE Healthcare). The injected 18F-FDA dose was typically 37 MBq, that is, a mean mass of 400 (range, 180–810) μg of 18F-FDA with a mean specific activity of ∼38 (range, about 30–49) GBq/mmol.

Analysis of Data

18F-FDA PET/CT studies were read by a nuclear medicine physician who was unaware of the results of other investigations. Any visible adrenal foci of uptake higher than the background were considered 18F-FDA positive. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) corrected for lean body mass were calculated (SUV = [Bq/g per Bq injected] × lean body mass) with software from MedImage. Maximum SUVs were determined in manually drawn regions of interest over adrenal lesions and in normal left adrenal glands, as delineated by CT. The SUV was not calculated for 18F-FDA–negative right adrenal glands to exclude interference from physiologic uptake by the liver and the biliary tract. Left adrenal gland SUVs of control subjects served as a reference for normal uptake.

Regions of interest were also drawn manually around the parotid gland, the thyroid gland, and the myocardium and in 4 consecutive slices around the right lung (level below the carina), the liver (upper part), the spleen (middle part), and the pancreas (body), as delineated by CT. Under the assumption of a homogeneous tracer distribution in the large organs, average SUVs were calculated for the central parts of the lungs, liver, and spleen. For the smaller organs, maximum SUVs were used, because estimates of average SUVs in smaller structures may be hampered by resolution limitations.

Statistics

Results are reported as mean ± SD. Fisher exact and unpaired Student t tests were used for comparisons of the numbers of 18F-FDA–positive adrenal glands and SUVs, respectively. A 2-sided P value of <0.05 was considered significant. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed for different upper reference limits of SUVs (10). Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows 12; SPSS Inc.).

RESULTS

Uptake of 18F-FDA by Adrenal Glands with PHEO Versus Normal Adrenal Glands

CT or MRI showed an adrenal tumor in all patients with PHEO. All 14 tumors were 18F-FDA positive (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Six of 13 control left adrenal glands (46%) were 18F-FDA positive; 2 of these contained an incidentaloma (P = 0.02 for controls vs. adrenal glands with PHEO) (Table 1). Maximum SUVs were higher in adrenal glands with PHEO (16.1 ± 6.1; range, 7.3–26.3) than in 18F-FDA–positive control left adrenal glands (7.7 ± 1.4; range, 5.7–9.5) (P = 0.005) (Fig. 2). The mean SUV in all control left adrenal glands, that is,18F-FDA positive and negative, was 6.6 ± 2.0 (range, 3.8–9.8) (P < 0.001 for controls vs. adrenal glands with PHEO).

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Cross-sectional 18F-FDA PET/CT images of patient with left adrenal gland PHEO (P10: 18F-FDA positive, SUV = 20.1) and 2 control subjects with normal left adrenal glands (C12: 18F-FDA positive, SUV = 9.5; C2: 18F-FDA negative, SUV = 3.9). Arrows indicate left adrenal gland areas.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

18F-FDA PET SUVs in normal left adrenal glands and left or right adrenal glands with PHEO. SUVmax = maximum SUV.

The area under the ROC curve for adrenal gland SUVs was 0.962 (Fig. 3). To provide 100% sensitivity, the upper reference for a normal SUV was established at 7.3, resulting in a specificity of 69%. To provide 100% specificity, the upper reference for normal was established at 10.1, resulting in a sensitivity of 86%. With this cutoff value, false-negative results were obtained in 2 patients (patients 1 and 2). The diameters of these tumors were 3 cm (patient 1) and 3.4 cm (patient 2); the latter was hemorrhagic.

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

ROC curve for 18F-FDA PET SUVs.

Extraadrenal Tissue Distributions of 18F-FDA

Physiologic 18F-FDA uptake was observed in the salivary and thyroid glands, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas, and bowel (Table 2 and Fig. 4), and values were similar between patients with PHEO and control subjects (Table 2).

FIGURE 4. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4. 

Tissue distributions of 18F-FDA. Anterior reprojected 18F-FDA PET images of patient with left adrenal gland PHEO (P11) and control subject (C4). 1 = liver; 2 = spleen; 3 = lungs; 4 = parotid glands; 5 = thyroid gland; 6 = heart; 7 = kidneys; 8 = PHEO. Adrenal glands in control subject were considered 18F-FDA negative.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Organ Distributions of Physiologic 18F-FDA Uptake

DISCUSSION

18F-FDA PET is a promising tool for the localization of PHEO (4,11). 18F-FDA is actively transported into neurosecretory granules of catecholamine-producing cells via vesicular monoamine transporters after uptake into cells by the norepinephrine transporter (12,13). We previously observed excellent sensitivity of 18F-FDA PET for the localization of benign PHEO (4). However, physiologic 18F-FDA uptake by normal adrenal glands and extraadrenal tissues is a possible confounder in the identification of adrenal gland PHEO and extraadrenal paraganglioma or metastases, respectively. In the present study, almost half of the control subjects had 18F-FDA–positive results. In our previous study, only 2 of 11 PHEO-negative subjects had false-positive 18F-FDA PET results. However, systematic investigation of the adrenal glands in our previous study and other early 18F-FDA PET studies (6,14) was hampered by the lack of coregistered CT. Physiologic uptake is probably even higher when higher tracer doses are administered. In a pilot study (data not shown), we performed non–CT-coregistered 18F-FDA PET with a dose of 148 MBq instead of 37 MBq in 7 control subjects without PHEO. With this higher dose, all normal left adrenal glands except for one were 18F-FDA positive, with a mean SUV of 8.8 ± 3.2.

We have found that SUVs of adrenal foci on 18F-FDA PET can help distinguish between PHEO-related uptake and physiologic uptake in the adrenal glands. SUV cutoffs were established at <7.3 for physiologic uptake and >10.1 for PHEO-related uptake (100% specificity and 100% sensitivity, respectively). However, findings on 18F-FDA PET should always be interpreted in conjunction with other radiologic, biochemical, and clinical characteristics. In particular, patients with underlying gene mutations predisposing them to recurrent and bilateral PHEOs warrant careful follow-up despite negative PET results. Furthermore, in the diagnostic work-up of PHEO,18F-FDA PET is best positioned as a localizing tool, not as a screening method for the presence of a PHEO. As pointed out earlier, biochemical screening represents the gold standard for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis. Also, with respect to screening for bilateral PHEOs, it is unknown whether adrenal gland uptake of 18F-FDA is altered by previous surgical resection of the contralateral gland. Theoretically, compensatory hypertrophy of the remaining adrenal medulla could lead to enhanced 18F-FDA uptake and false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, calculation of SUVs of adrenal foci on 18F-FDA PET facilitates the distinction between PHEO-related and physiologic tracer accumulation in the adrenal glands. The diagnosis of PHEO is highly unlikely when the adrenal gland SUV is below 7.3 and very likely when it exceeds 10.1.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NICHD, NIH, and, in part, by the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH. We thank Jacques Lenders for helpful discussions and feedback on the article.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366:665–675.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Pacak P, Eisenhofer G. Pheochromocytoma. In: De Groot LJ, Jameson JL, eds. Textbook of Endocrinology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, Inc.; 2005:2501–2534.
  3. 3.↵
    Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA. 2002;287:1427–1434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Li ST, Goldstein DS. 6-[18F]Fluorodopamine positron emission tomographic (PET) scanning for diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. Hypertension. 2001;38:6–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC. Pheochromocytomas: imaging with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Radiology. 1999;212:35–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Ilias I, Yu J, Carrasquillo JA, et al. Superiority of 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine positron emission tomography versus [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4083–4087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Bravo EL, Tagle R. Pheochromocytoma: state-of-the-art and future prospects. Endocrinol Rev. 2003;24:539–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Kaltsas GA, Papadogias D, Grossman AB. The clinical presentation (symptoms and signs) of sporadic and familial chromaffin cell tumours (phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas). Front Horm Res. 2004;31:61–75.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Chen CC, et al. Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2262–2269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Beck JR, Shultz EK. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986;110:13–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Pacak K, Goldstein DS, Doppman JL, Shulkin BL, Udelsman R, Eisenhofer GA. “Pheo” lurks: novel approaches for locating occult pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3641–3646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Eisenhofer G. The role of neuronal and extraneuronal plasma membrane transporters in the inactivation of peripheral catecholamines. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;91:35–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Ilias I, Shulkin B, Pacak K. New functional imaging modalities for chromaffin tumors, neuroblastomas and ganglioneuromas. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005;16:66–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Mamede M, Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, et al. Discordant localization of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine- and [(123)I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine-negative metastatic pheochromocytoma sites. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:31–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication May 2, 2007.
  • Accepted for publication August 24, 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 48 (12)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 48, Issue 12
December 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Usefulness of Standardized Uptake Values for Distinguishing Adrenal Glands with Pheochromocytoma from Normal Adrenal Glands by Use of 6-18F-Fluorodopamine PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Usefulness of Standardized Uptake Values for Distinguishing Adrenal Glands with Pheochromocytoma from Normal Adrenal Glands by Use of 6-18F-Fluorodopamine PET
Henri J.L.M. Timmers, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Millie Whatley, Graeme Eisenhofer, Clara C. Chen, Alexander Ling, W. Marston Linehan, Peter A. Pinto, Karen T. Adams, Karel Pacak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2007, 48 (12) 1940-1944; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043281

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Usefulness of Standardized Uptake Values for Distinguishing Adrenal Glands with Pheochromocytoma from Normal Adrenal Glands by Use of 6-18F-Fluorodopamine PET
Henri J.L.M. Timmers, Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Millie Whatley, Graeme Eisenhofer, Clara C. Chen, Alexander Ling, W. Marston Linehan, Peter A. Pinto, Karen T. Adams, Karel Pacak
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Dec 2007, 48 (12) 1940-1944; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043281
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Modern Nuclear Imaging for Paragangliomas: Beyond SPECT
  • 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT Accurately Localize Pheochromocytomas
  • Comparison of 6-18F-Fluorodopamine PET with 123I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111In-Pentetreotide Scintigraphy in Localization of Nonmetastatic and Metastatic Pheochromocytoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Cardiac Presynaptic Sympathetic Nervous Function Evaluated by Cardiac PET in Patients with Chronotropic Incompetence Without Heart Failure
  • Validation and Evaluation of a Vendor-Provided Head Motion Correction Algorithm on the uMI Panorama PET/CT System
Show more Clinical Investigations

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire