Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

In Vivo Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]GTP1 with [18F]MK-6240 and [18F]PI-2620 in Alzheimer Disease

Emily Olafson, Matteo Tonietto, Gregory Klein, Edmond Teng, Andrew W. Stephens, David S. Russell, Karen Pickthorn and Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2025, jnumed.124.268623; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268623
Emily Olafson
1gRED, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Tonietto
2pRED, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Klein
2pRED, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edmond Teng
1gRED, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew W. Stephens
3Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David S. Russell
4Invicro, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Pickthorn
1gRED, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez
1gRED, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Average SUVR images from participants in cohort 1 (A), imaged with [18F]GTP1 and [18F]PI-2620, and cohort 2 (B), imaged with [18F]GTP1 and [18F]MK-6240, representing range of uptake in both cohorts. Each row contains average SUVR images from same participants.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Paired plots showing [18F]GTP1, [18F]PI-2620, and [18F]MK-6240 SUVR values in target cortical regions. Solid lines represent 1 participant. Dashed line indicates SUVR = 1. Cognitively unimpaired participant scanned with all 3 tracers is highlighted with darker black lines.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Association between [18F]GTP1 and [18F]PI-2620 SUVRs in target regions.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Association between [18F]GTP1 and [18F]MK-6240 SUVRs in target regions.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Paired plots showing [18F]GTP1, [18F]PI-2620, and [18F]MK-6240 SUVRs in off-target regions. Solid gray lines connect measurements from same participant. Dashed gray line is drawn at SUVR = 1.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Voxelwise SUVR analysis showing voxelwise t-statistics from voxelwise pairwise t-tests overlaid on Montreal Neurological Institute T1 template. Only significant pseudo t-scores (family wise error rate < 0.05) are displayed.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Association between [18F]GTP1 and [18F]PI-2620 (A) and [18F]GTP1 and [18F]MK-6240 in Braak II before (A and C) and after (B and D) regressing out signal from choroid plexus (CP). CU = cognitively unimpaired.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Tracer Doses and Imaging Times

    TracerTarget injected dose (MBq) Imaging window (min)Scan length (min)
    [18F]GTP1259 (±10%)60–9030
    [18F]PI-2620185 (±10%)45–7530
    [18F]MK-6240185 (±20%)90–11020
    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of Two Cohorts

    ParameterCohort 1: [18F]GTP vs. [18F]PI-2620Cohort 2: [18F]GTP1 vs. [18F]MK-6240
    Whole cohort (n = 27)CU (n = 5)Prodromal AD (n = 10)Mild AD (n = 10)Moderate AD (n = 2)Whole cohort (n = 22)CU (n = 5)Prodromal AD (n = 3)Mild AD (n = 5)Moderate AD (n = 9)
    Sex (n)
     Male13444191134
     Female141661134225
    Age (y)
    Mean (SD)70.2 (5.3)71.2 (0.8)71.7 (5.4)69.9 (5.8)61.5 (0.7)71.3 (6.7)68.0 (2.5)73.7 (4.0)72.7 (7.7)71.0 (8.4)
    Min–max61–8070–7265–8062–7761–6254–8265–7170–7864–8254–82
    Race (n)
     White27510102204359
    Ethnicity (n)
     Hispanic/Latino2010130012
     Not Hispanic/Latino2559101185347
     Not Stated—————
    Centiloid, CTL
     Mean (SD)91.0 (41.1)31.8 (40.4)101.6 (34.1)110.4 (19.2)88.4 (33.7)81.2 (52.3)8.5 (23.5)87.3 (26.6)100.4 (20.7)112.6 (40.7)
     Min–max−5.2–146.0−5.2–81.146–146.077.1–140.764.6–112.3−17.5–181.1−17.5–106.156.8–106.168.6–119.163.2–181.1
    Injected dose [18F]GTP1 (MBQ)
     Mean (SD)261 (11)258 (4)260 (14)265 (7)257 (26)260 (8)260 (6)255 (6)259 (2)259 (7)
     Min–Max228–277254–265228–277257–275238–275247–277247–277248–259257–260247–267
    Injected dose* (MBq)
     Mean (SD)189 (11)193 (6)187 (12)187 (11)197 (3)190 (5)192 (3)193 (5)187 (10)190 (3)
     Min–max154–199183–198154–196166–198195–199176–197187–194187–197176–196185–194
    MMSE
     Mean (SD)25.5 (4.2)30 (0)26.9 (1.8)23.8 (3.5)16 (0)21.8 (6.5)29.8 (0.4)27.6 (1.2)20.8 (1.0)15.9 (3.3)
     Min–max16–3030-3024–3020–2816–1611–3029–3027–2920–2211–22
    CDR-SB
     Mean (SD)0.5 (0.3)0 (0)0.5 (0)0.7 (0.3)0.75 (0.4)0.6 (0.6)0 (0)0.5 (0)0.6 (0.2)0.9 (0.6)
     Min–max0–10–00.5–0.50.5–10.5–10–20–00.5–0.50.5–10.5–2
    • ↵* Injected dose of [18F]PI-2620 in cohort 1 and [18F]MK-6240 in cohort 2.

    • CU = cognitively unimpaired; CTL = Centiloid; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; CDR-SB = Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Cohort 1 ([18F]GTP1 and [18F]PI-2620) SUVR Quantification in Target Regions

    ROI[18F]GTP1 SUVR[18F]PI-2620 SUVRSUVR difference ([18F]GTP1 − [18F]PI-2620)r2 (95% CI)Slope (95% CI)Intercept (95% CI)
    Braak I1.61 ± 0.241.71 ± 0.29−0.10 ± 0.160.71* (0.50–0.84)1.28 (1.03–1.73)−0.35 (−1.10–0.03)
    Braak II1.32 ± 0.151.21 ± 0.170.11 ± 0.16*0.28* (0.05–0.49)1.14 (0.51–2.33)−0.29 (−1.88–0.52)
    Braak III1.42 ± 0.231.47 ± 0.34−0.05 ± 0.150.86* (0.73–0.93)1.51 (1.28–1.93)−0.67 (−1.25 to −0.36)
    Braak IV1.61 ± 0.401.72 ± 0.51−0.11 ± 0.18*0.91* (0.80–0.96)1.29 (1.15–1.59)−0.36 (−0.80 to −0.16)
    Braak V1.25 ± 0.211.29 ± 0.27−0.04 ± 0.120.82* (0.64–0.91)1.30 (1.06–1.68)−0.34 (−0.77 to −0.06)
    Braak VI1.07 ± 0.131.10 ± 0.18−0.03 ± 0.090.78* (0.54–0.91)1.46 (1.12–1.80)−0.46 (−0.83 to −0.09)
    Meta temporal1.58 ± 0.351.74 ± 0.44−0.16 ± 0.16*0.90* (0.79–0.94)1.29 (1.12–1.54)−0.31 (−0.66 to −0.07)
    Whole cortical gray1.29 ± 0.231.39 ± 0.27−0.10 ± 0.11*0.86* (0.72–0.92)1.23 (1.04–1.52)−0.19 (−0.53–0.07)
    • ↵* Indicates P (Bonferroni) < 0.05.

    • Slope of 2 indicates that for one-unit change in SUVR of [18F]GTP1, there is corresponding change in SUVR of 2 of [18F]PI-2620, on average.

    • Continuous data are median and range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Cohort 2 ([18F]GTP1 and [18F]MK-6240) SUVR Quantification in Target Regions

    ROI[18F]GTP1 SUVR[18F]MK-6240 SUVRSUVR difference ([18F]GTP1 – [18F]MK-6240)r2 (95% CI)Slope (95% CI)Intercept (95% CI)
    Braak I1.61 ± 0.411.97 ± 0.87−0.36 ± 0.540.79* (0.46–0.91)2.32 (1.87–2.86)−1.77 (−2.52 to −1.01)
    Braak II1.28 ± 0.201.32 ± 0.57−0.04 ± 0.480.39* (0.08–0.65)4.32 (2.82–7.68)−4.21 (−8.72 to −2.27)
    Braak III1.49 ± 0.381.99 ± 1.12−0.50 ± 0.77*0.89* (0.75–0.94)3.07 (2.54–3.59)−2.60 (−3.25 to −1.92)
    Braak IV1.63 ± 0.542.34 ± 1.39−0.71 ± 0.89*0.90* (0.80–0.94)2.67 (2.21–3.28)−2.02 (−2.83 to −1.41)
    Braak V1.28 ± 0.341.71 ± 1.02−0.43 ± 0.730.82* (0.66–0.89)3.28 (2.40–4.64)−2.49 (−4.01 to −1.49)
    Braak VI1.06 ± 0.151.23 ± 0.53−0.17 ± 0.420.60* (0.34–0.81)4.46 (2.88–8.08)−3.51 (−7.21 to −1.92)
    Metatemporal1.62 ± 0.492.31 ± 1.36−0.69 ± 0.90*0.91* (0.78–0.96)2.85 (2.42–3.39)−2.31 (−3.03 to −1.72)
    Whole cortical gray1.32 ± 0.331.78 ± 1.03−0.46 ± 0.730.86* (0.73–0.93)3.35 (2.51–4.36)−2.60 (−3.85 to −1.70)
    • ↵* Indicates P (Bonferroni) < 0.05.

    • Slope of 2 indicates that for one-unit change in SUVR of [18F]GTP1, there is corresponding change in SUVR of 2 of [18F]MK-6240, on average.

    • Continuous data are median and range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Off-Target Signal Quantification (Mean ± SD)

    ROI[18F]GTP1 SUVR[18F]PI-2620 SUVRSUVR difference ([18F]GTP1 − [18F]PI-2620)[18F]GTP1 SUVR[18F]MK-6240 SUVRSUVR difference [18F] (GTP1 − [18F]MK-6240)
    Thalamus1.07 ± 0.110.96 ± 0.120.10 ± 0.11*1.07 ± 0.100.75 ± 0.110.32 ± 0.15*
    Caudate0.89 ± 0.130.80 ± 0.120.08 ± 0.12*0.97 ± 0.160.81 ± 0.260.16 ± 0.26
    Putamen1.25 ± 0.161.08 ± 0.150.18 ± 0.14*1.30 ± 0.171.06 ± 0.340.25 ± 0.32*
    Pallidum1.21 ± 0.161.09 ± 0.200.12 ± 0.17*1.27 ± 0.200.95 ± 0.190.32 ± 0.23*
    Choroid plexus1.13 ± 0.260.97 ± 0.170.16 ± 0.22*1.19 ± 0.280.79 ± 0.170.40 ± 0.25*
    Skull/meninges1.17 ± 0.451.48 ± 0.39−0.31 ± 0.27*1.12 ± 0.251.40 ± 0.41−0.28 ± 0.38*
    • ↵* Indicates P (Bonferroni) < 0.05.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (6)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 6
June 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vivo Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]GTP1 with [18F]MK-6240 and [18F]PI-2620 in Alzheimer Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
In Vivo Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]GTP1 with [18F]MK-6240 and [18F]PI-2620 in Alzheimer Disease
Emily Olafson, Matteo Tonietto, Gregory Klein, Edmond Teng, Andrew W. Stephens, David S. Russell, Karen Pickthorn, Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, jnumed.124.268623; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268623

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vivo Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]GTP1 with [18F]MK-6240 and [18F]PI-2620 in Alzheimer Disease
Emily Olafson, Matteo Tonietto, Gregory Klein, Edmond Teng, Andrew W. Stephens, David S. Russell, Karen Pickthorn, Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, jnumed.124.268623; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268623
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Ultra-Low-Activity 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Using a Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT System
  • Is Long–Axial-Field-of-View PET/CT Cost-Effective? An International Health–Economic Analysis
  • Multicycle Dosimetric Behavior and Dose–Effect Relationships in [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • tau PET
  • Alzheimer disease
  • harmonization
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire