Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Tumor Dose–Response Relationship of [131I]MIBG Therapy in Patients with Neural Crest Tumors by Means of [124I]MIBG PET

Alexandros Moraitis, Andre Prochnow, Thorsten Dirk Poeppel, Jochen Schmitz, Christina Laschinsky, Ken Herrmann, Andreas Bockisch, Pedro Fragoso Costa, David Kersting and Walter Jentzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2025, 66 (4) 641-647; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.269377
Alexandros Moraitis
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Prochnow
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thorsten Dirk Poeppel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jochen Schmitz
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Laschinsky
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Bockisch
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Fragoso Costa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Kersting
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Jentzen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
2German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

[131I]Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) therapy in patients with neural crest tumors has demonstrated sustained control of catecholamine-associated hypertension and corresponding partial response. Details on how neural crest tumors respond to an absorbed dose delivered by [131I]MIBG-targeted therapies is insufficiently known. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to assess the tumor dose–response relationship by means of quantitative analysis of [124I]MIBG PET data. Methods: The tumor dose–response relationship was studied in patients with advanced malignant pheochromocytoma, neuroblastoma, or paraganglioma receiving [131I]MIBG treatment, as well as pretherapeutic and follow-up [124I]MIBG-based dosimetry. [124I]MIBG PET imaging was performed around 4, 24, 48, and 120 h after injection. Lesion uptake was projected to [131I]MIBG for every time point, and respective time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) for [131I]MIBG were calculated and used for tumor-absorbed dose estimation. Functional response was denoted for decrease of maximal lesion uptake or TIAC by at least 30% in the follow-up examination. In a consecutive analysis, the predictive value of a single tumor-uptake assessment from PET imaging at 24 h after administration was investigated with respect to receiving the derived target dose. Results: In total, 46 lesions from 9 patients were available for dose–response analysis. The mean ± SD tumor-absorbed dose coefficient was 13.4 ± 15.4 Gy/GBq (median, 7.2 Gy/GBq; range, 1.1–64.7 Gy/GBq). A high correlation (−0.60, P < 0.001) was found between uptake decrease and tumor dose. In addition, a very high correlation (0.91, P < 0.001) was found between uptake and TIAC decrease. The estimated targeted tumor dose was 200 Gy, that is, the dose at which the response rate exceeded the 90% threshold. A single 24-h uptake assessment showed predictive value with respect to receiving the target dose. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a clear correlation between tumor-absorbed dose and functional response in [131I]MIBG therapy and proposes a target dose for response at the tumor level.

  • dose response
  • [124I]MIBG
  • [131I]MIBG
  • neural crest tumor
  • PET

Footnotes

  • Published online Mar. 13, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 4
April 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor Dose–Response Relationship of [131I]MIBG Therapy in Patients with Neural Crest Tumors by Means of [124I]MIBG PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Tumor Dose–Response Relationship of [131I]MIBG Therapy in Patients with Neural Crest Tumors by Means of [124I]MIBG PET
Alexandros Moraitis, Andre Prochnow, Thorsten Dirk Poeppel, Jochen Schmitz, Christina Laschinsky, Ken Herrmann, Andreas Bockisch, Pedro Fragoso Costa, David Kersting, Walter Jentzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2025, 66 (4) 641-647; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor Dose–Response Relationship of [131I]MIBG Therapy in Patients with Neural Crest Tumors by Means of [124I]MIBG PET
Alexandros Moraitis, Andre Prochnow, Thorsten Dirk Poeppel, Jochen Schmitz, Christina Laschinsky, Ken Herrmann, Andreas Bockisch, Pedro Fragoso Costa, David Kersting, Walter Jentzen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2025, 66 (4) 641-647; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269377
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dose response
  • [124I]MIBG
  • [131I]MIBG
  • neural crest tumor
  • PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire