Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleFEATURED ARTICLE OF THE MONTH

177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar and Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2025, 66 (2) 238-244; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268617
Swayamjeet Satapathy
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piyush Aggarwal
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashwani Sood
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunal R. Chandekar
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chandan K. Das
3Department of Clinical Haematology and Medical Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
4Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajesh Gupta
5Department of GI Surgery, HPB and Liver Transplantation, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Divya Khosla
6Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Namrata Das
6Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; and
7Proton International London Ltd., University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Kapoor
6Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajender Kumar
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harmandeep Singh
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jaya Shukla
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ajay Kumar
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhagwant Rai Mittal
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    CONSORT flow diagram describing study enrollment process.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Waterfall plots showing radiographic responses in experimental (A) and control (B) arms. x-axis represents individual patients, and y-axis represents maximum percent change in sum of largest dimensions (SLD) from baseline. ●Appearance of new lesions. #Patient died before radiographic assessment. *Nonmeasurable disease. CAP = capecitabine; Lu-TATE = 177Lu-DOTATATE.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Forest plot for objective radiographic response across different subgroups for experimental arm versus control arm. Squares represent risk ratio (RR), and horizontal lines represent 95% CIs. CAP = capecitabine; GI-NET = gastrointestinal NET; Lu-TATE = 177Lu-DOTATATE; p-NET = pancreatic NET.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Kaplan–Meier curves showing PFS (A) and OS (B) between 2 arms. CAP = capecitabine; Lu-TATE = 177Lu-DOTATATE.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients in the Study

    Characteristic177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (n = 36)177Lu-DOTATATE alone (n = 36)P
    Age (y)52.5 (43–60)54.5 (37–61.8)0.844
     <60 y27 (75)23 (64)0.306
     ≥60 y9 (25)13 (36)
    Sex
     Males13 (36)18 (50)0.234
     Females23 (64)18 (50)
    Primary tumor site
     Gastrointestinal NET24 (67)21 (58)0.465
      Stomach4 (11)3 (8)
      Small bowel18 (50)14 (39)
      Large bowel2 (6)4 (11)
     Pancreatic NET12 (33)15 (42)
    Tumor grade
     Grade 112 (33)16 (44)0.334
     Grade 224 (67)20 (56)
    Ki-67 index
     <10%25 (69)28 (78)0.422
     ≥10%11 (31)8 (22)
    Prior treatment
     Surgery11 (31)14 (39)0.458
     SSA23 (64)22 (61)0.808
     Everolimus12 (33)9 (25)0.437
     Sunitinib3 (8)1 (3)0.614
     Chemotherapy1 (3)4 (11)0.357
    Functional symptom(s) at baseline3 (8)4 (11)1.000
    Disease extent at baseline
     Primary27 (75)23 (64)0.306
     Lymph nodes21 (58)24 (67)0.216
     Liver31 (86)27 (75)0.234
     Bones11 (31)12 (33)0.800
     Lungs1 (3)1 (3)1.000
     Others9 (25)7 (19)0.571
    Krenning score
     315 (42)12 (33)0.465
     421 (58)24 (67)
    18F-FDG PET status*
     Negative18 (50)15 (42)0.478
     Positive18 (50)21 (58)
    • ↵* 18F-FDG PET status determined as positive if lesion uptake was higher than that of background.

    • SSA = somatostatin analog.

    • Qualitative data are number and percentage. Continuous data are median and IQR of first–third quartiles.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Toxicity Profile of Patients in the Study as Evaluated with CTCAE Version 5.0

    177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine (n = 36)177Lu-DOTATATE alone (n = 36)
    Type of AEAny gradeGrade 3/4Any gradeGrade 3/4P*
    Any AE29 (81)7 (19)31 (86)6 (17)0.527
    AE causing treatment discontinuation2 (6)†1 (3)2 (6)‡2 (6)1.000
    Symptomatic events
     Nausea19 (53)0 (0)18 (50)0 (0)0.814
     Vomiting17 (47)0 (0)16 (44)0 (0)0.813
     Diarrhea3 (8)0 (0)1 (3)0 (0)0.614
     Fatigue10 (28)0 (0)6 (17)0 (0)0.257
     Weight loss2 (6)0 (0)2 (6)0 (0)1.000
     Weight gain0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)0 (0)1.000
     Pain in abdomen7 (19)1 (3)10 (28)1 (3)0.405
     Abdominal distension6 (17)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0.025
     Musculoskeletal pain2 (6)0 (0)5 (14)1 (3)0.429
     Decreased appetite1 (3)0 (0)3 (8)0 (0)0.614
    Hematologic and biochemical events
     Anemia13 (36)3 (8)14 (39)2 (6)0.808
     Leukopenia14 (39)3 (8)13 (36)1 (3)0.808
     Thrombocytopenia11 (31)1 (3)12 (33)3 (8)0.800
     Neutropenia5 (14)1 (3)2 (6)0 (0)0.429
     Increased creatinine3 (8)0 (0)8 (22)0 (0)0.101
     Raised AST/ALT3 (8)0 (0)2 (6)0 (0)1.000
     Raised ALP5 (14)1 (3)4 (11)0 (0)1.000
     Raised serum bilirubin3 (8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0.239
     Reduced serum albumin3 (8)0 (0)4 (11)0 (0)1.000
     Hypo- or hypernatremia2 (6)0 (0)4 (11)0 (0)0.674
     Hypo- or hyperkalemia2 (6)1 (3)1 (3)0 (0)1.000
    • ↵* P values estimated for comparisons of AEs of any grade.

    • ↵† AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in experimental arm included persistent grade 3 cytopenias (n = 1) and grade 2 increased serum creatinine (n = 1).

    • ↵‡ AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in control arm included persistent grade 3 cytopenias (n = 1) and grade 3 cytopenias along with grade 2 increased serum creatinine (n = 1).

    • CTCAE = Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; AST = aspartate transaminase; ALT = alanine transaminase; ALP = alkaline phosphatase.

    • Qualitative data are number and percentage.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 2
February 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, 66 (2) 238-244; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268617

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Capecitabine Versus 177Lu-DOTATATE Alone in Patients with Advanced Grade 1/2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (LuCAP): A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
Swayamjeet Satapathy, Piyush Aggarwal, Ashwani Sood, Kunal R. Chandekar, Chandan K. Das, Rajesh Gupta, Divya Khosla, Namrata Das, Rakesh Kapoor, Rajender Kumar, Harmandeep Singh, Jaya Shukla, Ajay Kumar, Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, 66 (2) 238-244; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268617
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Randomized, Phase 2 Trial LuCAP Study
  • Reply to "The Randomized, Phase 2 LuCAP Study"
  • Clinical Outcomes of 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insights from Real-World Experience
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • CD70-Targeted [18F]RCCB6 Immuno-PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Proof-of-Concept Study
  • MHC-I–Driven Antitumor Immunity Counterbalances Low Absorbed Doses of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy
  • IL13Rα2-Targeting Antibodies for Immuno-PET in Solid Malignancies
Show more FEATURED ARTICLE OF THE MONTH

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • GEP-NETs
  • 177Lu-DOTATATE
  • capecitabine
  • radiosensitizer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire