Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Diuresis During 18F-Flotufolastat (rhPSMA-7.3) PET/CT Improves Recurrence Detection After Prostatectomy: A Prospective Phase II Trial

Ismaheel O. Lawal, Aliza Mushtaq, Ashesh B. Jani, Manali Rupji, Vishal R. Dhere, Sagar A. Patel, Mehmet A. Bilen, Pretesh R. Patel, Nikhil T. Sebastian, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, David M. Schuster and Charles Marcus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2025, 66 (2) 230-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268574
Ismaheel O. Lawal
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aliza Mushtaq
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashesh B. Jani
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manali Rupji
4Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vishal R. Dhere
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sagar A. Patel
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mehmet A. Bilen
5Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pretesh R. Patel
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikhil T. Sebastian
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey M. Switchenko
4Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Schuster
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Marcus
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;
6Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have emerged as a sensitive tool for PET imaging of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. Yet urinary bladder activity may obscure the visualization of prostate bed recurrence. Among the Food and Drug Administration–approved PSMA radiopharmaceuticals, 18F-flotufolastat (rhPSMA-7.3) has the lowest urinary excreted activity. We investigated the impact of diuresis with intravenous furosemide and oral hydration on bladder activity and PCa recurrence detection in patients with PCa after prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence. Methods: This phase II study (NCT05779943) prospectively recruited men with PCa after prostatectomy with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of at least 0.1 ng/mL. All patients had 2 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans, one with 20 mg of furosemide administered intravenously with the radiotracer and the other without. SUVmean, SUVmax, and bladder volume were compared between the with- and without-furosemide PET/CT studies. PCa lesion detection was compared between the 2 sets of scans. Results: Twenty men with a median PSA of 0.61 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.18–1.15) completed both sets of scans. Bladder activity was significantly lower for the with- than the without-furosemide studies, at a median SUVmax of 4.20 (range, 1.70–19.80) versus 13.35 (range, 3.90–165.4), respectively (P = 0.014), and a median SUVmean of 2.95 (range, 0.80–17.60) versus 10.00 (range, 1.90–140.00), respectively (P = 0.017). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that both furosemide administration and bladder distention were independent covariates for reduced bladder activity. At the prostate bed region level, the recurrence detection rates were 17 of 20 (85%) and 12 of 20 (60%) for the with- and without-furosemide studies, respectively (P = 0.025). No difference in detection rates was present at the per-patient, pelvic, or extrapelvic regions between the 2 sets of studies. Three of 20 without-furosemide studies had a mild noninterfering peribladder halo artifact, but none had an artifact with furosemide. Conclusion: In men with biochemical recurrence and a PSA level of at least 0.1 ng/mL after prostatectomy for PCa, a strategy with 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT and concordant low-dose furosemide further reduces urinary bladder intensity and increases local recurrence detection. Even without the use of a diuretic, relative bladder distension alone also reduces bladder activity, though not to the same degree as with a diuretic.

  • prostate cancer
  • biochemical recurrence
  • prostate bed region
  • 18F-flotufolastat
  • rhPSMA-7.3
  • furosemide

Footnotes

  • Published online Jan. 23, 2025.

  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 2
February 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diuresis During 18F-Flotufolastat (rhPSMA-7.3) PET/CT Improves Recurrence Detection After Prostatectomy: A Prospective Phase II Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Diuresis During 18F-Flotufolastat (rhPSMA-7.3) PET/CT Improves Recurrence Detection After Prostatectomy: A Prospective Phase II Trial
Ismaheel O. Lawal, Aliza Mushtaq, Ashesh B. Jani, Manali Rupji, Vishal R. Dhere, Sagar A. Patel, Mehmet A. Bilen, Pretesh R. Patel, Nikhil T. Sebastian, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, David M. Schuster, Charles Marcus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, 66 (2) 230-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268574

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Diuresis During 18F-Flotufolastat (rhPSMA-7.3) PET/CT Improves Recurrence Detection After Prostatectomy: A Prospective Phase II Trial
Ismaheel O. Lawal, Aliza Mushtaq, Ashesh B. Jani, Manali Rupji, Vishal R. Dhere, Sagar A. Patel, Mehmet A. Bilen, Pretesh R. Patel, Nikhil T. Sebastian, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, David M. Schuster, Charles Marcus
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2025, 66 (2) 230-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268574
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • biochemical recurrence
  • prostate bed region
  • 18F-flotufolastat
  • rhPSMA-7.3
  • furosemide
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire