Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Rates of PSMA PET Staging and Positivity in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in a National Health Care System

Sean R. Miller, Rachel Tucker Gonzalez, William C. Jackson, Megan E.V. Caram, Phoebe A. Tsao, Kristian Stensland, Yashesh Shah, Daniel Wale, Ka Kit Wong, Benjamin L. Viglianti, David Elliott, Tanner Caverly, Timothy P. Hofer, Sameer Saini, Michael D. Green, Matthew Schipper, Robert T. Dess and Alex K. Bryant
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2025, 66 (1) 75-83; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268555
Sean R. Miller
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Tucker Gonzalez
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William C. Jackson
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan E.V. Caram
4Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phoebe A. Tsao
4Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristian Stensland
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
6Section of Urology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
7Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yashesh Shah
8Division of Nuclear Medicine, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Wale
8Division of Nuclear Medicine, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ka Kit Wong
9Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin L. Viglianti
9Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Elliott
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanner Caverly
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
10Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy P. Hofer
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
10Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sameer Saini
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
10Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Green
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Schipper
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert T. Dess
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex K. Bryant
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
5Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 for the staging of newly diagnosed prostate cancer, yet rates of adoption and real-world positivity rates are unknown. We characterized patients undergoing PSMA PET staging and describe positive findings in a large national cohort. Methods: We identified all newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients in the national Veterans Health Administration from June 2020 to August 2023. Demographics, staging imaging reports, and cancer-related information were obtained from electronic medical record data. To assess positive findings, we chart-reviewed 1,994 patients (n = 657 low to intermediate risk) with staging PSMA PET reports available. Results: Among 31,838 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, 4,538 (14%) underwent PSMA staging. Use of PSMA staging increased rapidly from near 0 in early 2021 to approximately 70% of patients with high- or very-high-risk disease by August 2023. Among patients who were N0/M0 by conventional imaging, PSMA PET positivity rates (N1 or M1) were 5.9% for favorable intermediate risk, 8.2% for unfavorable intermediate risk, 14% for high risk, and 34% for very high risk. Conclusion: PSMA PET staging for newly diagnosed prostate cancer increased rapidly in the Veterans Health Administration. Positivity rates were less than 10% in this large intermediate-risk cohort. These data confirm the utility of PSMA PET staging in high-risk disease and suggest that additional study is needed to refine patient selection in intermediate-risk disease.

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA PET
  • staging
  • © 2025 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

SNMMI members

SNMMI Member Login

Login to the site using your SNMMI member credentials

Individuals

Non-Member Login

Login as an individual user

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 1
January 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rates of PSMA PET Staging and Positivity in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in a National Health Care System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Rates of PSMA PET Staging and Positivity in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in a National Health Care System
Sean R. Miller, Rachel Tucker Gonzalez, William C. Jackson, Megan E.V. Caram, Phoebe A. Tsao, Kristian Stensland, Yashesh Shah, Daniel Wale, Ka Kit Wong, Benjamin L. Viglianti, David Elliott, Tanner Caverly, Timothy P. Hofer, Sameer Saini, Michael D. Green, Matthew Schipper, Robert T. Dess, Alex K. Bryant
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, 66 (1) 75-83; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268555

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rates of PSMA PET Staging and Positivity in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in a National Health Care System
Sean R. Miller, Rachel Tucker Gonzalez, William C. Jackson, Megan E.V. Caram, Phoebe A. Tsao, Kristian Stensland, Yashesh Shah, Daniel Wale, Ka Kit Wong, Benjamin L. Viglianti, David Elliott, Tanner Caverly, Timothy P. Hofer, Sameer Saini, Michael D. Green, Matthew Schipper, Robert T. Dess, Alex K. Bryant
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, 66 (1) 75-83; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268555
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • PSMA PET
  • staging
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire