Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation
Open Access

Comparability of Quantifying Relative Lung Ventilation with Inhaled 99mTc-Technegas and 133Xe in Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lung Transplantation

Ashwin Singh Parihar, Joyce C. Mhlanga, Henry D. Royal and Barry A. Siegel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2025, 66 (1) 104-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268801
Ashwin Singh Parihar
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joyce C. Mhlanga
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry D. Royal
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry A. Siegel
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Study workflow.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Planar scintigraphy images obtained after inhalation of 133Xe in posterior projection (A) and 99mTc-Technegas in posterior and anterior projections (B) in patient with representative images of semiautomated ROIs used for deriving relative ventilation percentages. Measured relative ventilation of left lung was 58% with 133Xe, 60% on posterior 99mTc-Technegas image, and 57% with 99mTc-Technegas geometric mean. BG = background.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Scatterplots showing comparison of relative left lung ventilation percentages obtained on posterior 133Xe images with those obtained using 99mTc-Technegas on posterior image (A) and with geometric mean method (B). Heat map shows maximal clustering of sampled data points in region of 40%–55%. Dotted maroon line represents line of equality. Blue line represents trend line with local regression smoothing and span of 90%. Note strong positive correlation between relative ventilation percentage of left lung as measured on posterior projection 133Xe images with posterior projection 99mTc-Technegas images, with trend line close to line of equality. Scatterplot helps in identifying overall trend as well as outliers (those with >15% difference, marked by arrows). Relatively lower slope toward higher percentages is likely due to fewer data points and effect from outlier.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Bland–Altman plot showing comparison of relative left lung ventilation percentages obtained on posterior 133Xe and 99mTc-Technegas images (A: posterior 99mTc-Technegas; B: geometric mean 99mTc-Technegas). Vertical axis shows difference between percentages obtained from 133Xe and 99mTc-Technegas, whereas horizontal axis is mean of 2 percentages. Orange line is line of equality, denoting no difference in percentages obtained using 2 methods. Blue line represents mean difference between 133Xe and 99mTc-Technegas percentages. Green lines represent ±15% difference limits. Maroon lines represent 95% CI limits for mean. 2 outliers with >15% difference in percentages are marked with rd arrows.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Posterior planar images obtained after inhalation of 133Xe (A) and 99mTc-Technegas (B) in patient with >15% discordance between relative ventilation percentages obtained using 2 techniques. Note overall heterogeneity of 133Xe distribution with visual suggestion of relatively better ventilated left lung (A). Heterogeneity is more marked on 99mTc-Technegas image (B), which, in addition to prominent left–right lung ventilation difference, also highlights relatively better ventilated left lower lung than left upper lung. Measured relative ventilation of left lung was 57% on 133Xe and 79% on 99mTc-Technegas.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Posterior planar images obtained after inhalation of 133Xe (A) and 99mTc-Technegas (B) in patient with >15% discordance between relative ventilation percentages obtained using the 2 techniques. Although appearance looks largely similar, note increased central deposition of 99mTc-Technegas in left lung (B, arrows) and increased activity in right lung base. Measured relative ventilation of left lung was 19% on 133Xe and 36% on 99mTc-Technegas.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Correlation Coefficients for Relative Ventilation of Left Lung Expressed as Percentage as Measured on Posterior Projection 133Xe and 99mTc-Technegas Images

    ParameterrP
    Left lung: 133Xe and posterior 99mTc-Technegas0.79 (95% CI, 0.69–0.86)<0.0001
    Left lung: 133Xe and geometric mean from 99mTc-Technegas0.77 (95% CI, 0.65–0.85)<0.0001
    Left lung: 133Xe and anterior 99mTc-Technegas0.70 (95% CI. 0.56–0.80)<0.0001
    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Visual Assessment of 99mTc-Technegas Images in Terms of Homogeneity of Radiotracer Distribution and Deposition of Radiotracer in Central and Peripheral Airways

    ParameterScore 0 (n)Score 1 (n)Score 2 (n)Score 3 (n)
    Heterogeneity*1928225
    Central deposition†3717182
    Peripheral deposition†501581
    • ↵* Heterogeneity scoring: 0 = homogeneous, 1 = mildly heterogeneous, 2 = moderately heterogeneous, 3 = severely heterogeneous.

    • ↵† Central or peripheral deposition scoring: 0 = no central/peripheral deposition, 1 = mildly increased deposition, 2 = moderately increased deposition, 3 = markedly increased deposition.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 66 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 66, Issue 1
January 1, 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparability of Quantifying Relative Lung Ventilation with Inhaled 99mTc-Technegas and 133Xe in Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lung Transplantation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Comparability of Quantifying Relative Lung Ventilation with Inhaled 99mTc-Technegas and 133Xe in Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lung Transplantation
Ashwin Singh Parihar, Joyce C. Mhlanga, Henry D. Royal, Barry A. Siegel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, 66 (1) 104-109; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268801

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparability of Quantifying Relative Lung Ventilation with Inhaled 99mTc-Technegas and 133Xe in Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Lung Transplantation
Ashwin Singh Parihar, Joyce C. Mhlanga, Henry D. Royal, Barry A. Siegel
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2025, 66 (1) 104-109; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268801
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 99mTc-Technegas
  • 133Xe
  • scintigraphy
  • quantification
  • differential
  • pulmonary
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire