Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportEducational Exhibits - Radiopharmaceutical Sciences

Computerized Molecular Docking for the Computational Binding Efficiency of PET Radiotracers: A Comprehensive Workflow

Andrew Lee, Thomas Werner, Abass Alavi, Babak Saboury and Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242414;
Andrew Lee
1University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Werner
2Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abass Alavi
1University of Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Babak Saboury
3Institute of Nuclear Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
4Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

242414

Introduction: Computational Molecular Docking is a resource that has emerged from the advent of bioinformatics, enabling analysis of binding affinities through 3D protein structure modeling. Specifically, molecular docking software such as Autodock Vina, provide insights on chemical interactions underlying optimal conformation of a ligand into a protein’s active site. This has major applications in novel PET radiotracer synthesis, as molecular docking can be used for pharmaceutical screening of candidate tracers before retrosynthetic development. Understanding precise strengths and binding affinities is especially crucial to assess potential off-target binding interactions and permeability of membranes prior to in vivo radiotracer injection analysis.

Methods: A meticulous literature review was performed with insights from molecular docking applications in radiotracer synthesis. Inclusion of articles were selected from a broad range of PET imaging fields to provide scope of the docking’s application. Additionally, methodology of molecular docking, including its synergistic combination with 3D protein modeling software, were studied. This project aims to 1) present scientists with a potential tool that can aid in synthesis, 2) convey a wide range of past research that has utilized molecular docking, and 3) describe a comprehensive framework for implementation.

Results: A wide range of studies have utilized molecular docking, including researchers synthesizing 18F tracers binding to fibroblast activation proteins in brains, designing 68Ga inhibitors for poly ADP-ribose polymerase tumor targeting, and development of 18F monoacylglycerol lipase mapping PET tracers for neurological diseases. In these studies, molecular docking aided in identification of optimal ligand fitting, which were refined through techniques such as replacement of cyclopropyl ring substituents or insertion of moieties. Furthermore, molecular docking enables rapid quantification of π-π, hydrophobic, and h-bonding interactions, orientation of ligand insertion, and individual functional group effects on ligand binding. In the synthesis of multiple radiotracers for experimentation with small alterations in chemical structure, molecular docking simulations can save complex synthetic work. Applications of molecular docking provide a 3D view of structure in a comprehensive format and can be integrated into protein databases and Pymol modeling software for better analysis. In one such study, identification of the lowest energy conformation was associated with optimal orientation to the catalytic triad of the protein that would otherwise enable hydrolytic cleavage, which further supported binding affinity results from cellular uptake staining experiments. In another, the PET radiotracer 68Ga PSMA11 and therapeutic radiopharmaceutical (such as 177Lu PSMA617) are slightly different (PSMA11 versus PSMA617), this computational technique can be utilized to predict the kinetic of one from the imaging results.

A typical molecular docking workflow starts with x-ray crystallography with high probability of correct molecular structure. In the case of Autodock, proteins can be modified with AutoDockTools provided by the Scripps Research Institute. Next, binding map adjustments must be made, including docking grid box arrangements and parameters for docking. Lastly, automated docking will rank configurations and identity potential binding interactions.

Conclusions: Molecular docking software can provide important insights on radiotracer ligand binding prior to actual synthesis. Rapid analysis on binding interactions and active site configurations can aid in development of novel radiotracers.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computerized Molecular Docking for the Computational Binding Efficiency of PET Radiotracers: A Comprehensive Workflow
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Computerized Molecular Docking for the Computational Binding Efficiency of PET Radiotracers: A Comprehensive Workflow
Andrew Lee, Thomas Werner, Abass Alavi, Babak Saboury, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242414;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Computerized Molecular Docking for the Computational Binding Efficiency of PET Radiotracers: A Comprehensive Workflow
Andrew Lee, Thomas Werner, Abass Alavi, Babak Saboury, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 242414;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Personalized Dosimetry for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Predicting Absorbed Dose from a Single Diagnostic Dynamic PET Study using Graphical Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulation
  • MIRDrelease: An accessible guidance and calculation tool for patient release in radiopharmaceutical therapy
Show more Educational Exhibits - Radiopharmaceutical Sciences

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire