Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Image Generation

Dose-aware diffusion model for 3D low-dose PET denoising: A multi-institutional validation with reader study and real low-dose data

Huidong Xie, Weijie Gan, Bo Zhou, Ming-Kai Chen, Michal Kulon, Annemarie Boustani, Xiongchao Chen, Qiong Liu, Xueqi Guo, Menghua Xia, Liang Guo, Hongyu An, Ulugbek Kamilov, Hanzhong Wang, Biao Li, Axel Rominger, Kuangyu Shi, Ge Wang and Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241797;
Huidong Xie
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weijie Gan
2Washington University in St. Louis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Zhou
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming-Kai Chen
3YALE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michal Kulon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annemarie Boustani
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiongchao Chen
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiong Liu
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xueqi Guo
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Menghua Xia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liang Guo
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongyu An
4Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulugbek Kamilov
2Washington University in St. Louis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanzhong Wang
5Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Biao Li
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Axel Rominger
7Inselspital, Bern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kuangyu Shi
8Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Bern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ge Wang
9Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi Liu
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241797

Introduction: Low-dose PET imaging is an important topic. Recently, diffusion models have demonstrated strong potential for different medical imaging tasks. However, it is challenging to extend diffusion model for 3D PET denoising problems due to the memory burden. 2D diffusion model would result in sever inconsistency between different slices. In this work, we introduce DDPET-3D, a Dose-aware Diffusion model for 3D low-dose PET imaging to address these challenges. DDPET-3D is dose-aware and can be generalized for PET image denoising of different noise-levels. We extensively evaluated the performance of DDPET-3D using a large number of 18F-FDG PET images acquired from three scanners at medical centers across three continents with low-count levels ranging from 1% to 50%. To demonstrate the clinical potential, reader studies were conducted to assess the image quality. A group of real low-dose data was also included for evaluation.

Methods: For our proposed DDPET approach, to address the 3D inconsistency problem often associated with diffusion model for 3D imaging, we utilized neighboring slices as conditional information during forward and reverse sampling steps and used multiple Gaussian noise variables in the reverse sampling. We also used a pre-trained denoising network as the starting point in the reverse process and fixed the reverse Gaussian noise variables. In addition, we combined both denoising diffusion probabilistic and denoising diffusion implicit models to improve image texture. Lastly, to achieve dose-aware denoising, total injected dose was added as an additional conditional information.

A total of 9,723 18F-FDG 3D PET image volumes from 1,586 patients were included. 429 patients were used for network training and validation, and the remaining 1,157 patients (5,883 low-count/low-dose image volumes) were used for network testing. The datasets were collected at Yale New Haven Hospital, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, and University of Bern Hospital. Three types of different scanners were used in different hospitals. Low-count levels ranging from 1% to 50% were generated through listmode rebinning. 20 real low-dose patient studies were acquired using a United Imaging uExplorer scanner with an average injected dose of 27.1±5.4 MBq. For image quality evaluation, we randomly selected 45 patients from each of the scanner (15 each) and all the 20 real low-dose patients for a reader study (total of 65 patients). Three nuclear medicine physicians from the Yale New Haven Hospital participated in the reader study independently. Multiple 3D images volumes (in DICOM format) of the same patient generated by various methods were provided to the reader each time, and readers were asked to rank each image based on the overall image quality. Readers were also asked to comment on whether any lesions were presented. Images were quantitatively evaluated using SSIM, PSNR, and NRMSE across all the 1,157 testing patients. We also compared DDPET-3D with Unified Noise-aware Network (UNN), a previously method for noise-aware denoising.

Results: DDPET-3D consistently produced superior denoising results to those of UNN for a variety of input count levels. Based on the reader study results, all three readers agree that, at 25% and 50% low-count levels, DDPET-3D produced images with better or similar overall quality to the 100% full-count images across all three scanners. DDPET-3D also consistently received superior ranking scores for the real low-dose scans. DDPET-3D also consistently performed better than UNN quantitatively. For example, at 5% low-count level, the NRMSE values for low-count images, UNN, and DDPET-3D results are 0.245, 0.175, and 0.151, respectively for the United Imaging dataset. These numbers are 0.220, 0.141, and 0.127 for the Siemens Vision Quadra datasets, and 0.474, 0.291, and 0.262 for the Siemens mCT dataset.

Conclusions: Evaluated on a large number of multi-center data with a reader study, DDPET-3D demonstrated its potential to produce high quality low-count PET images.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dose-aware diffusion model for 3D low-dose PET denoising: A multi-institutional validation with reader study and real low-dose data
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dose-aware diffusion model for 3D low-dose PET denoising: A multi-institutional validation with reader study and real low-dose data
Huidong Xie, Weijie Gan, Bo Zhou, Ming-Kai Chen, Michal Kulon, Annemarie Boustani, Xiongchao Chen, Qiong Liu, Xueqi Guo, Menghua Xia, Liang Guo, Hongyu An, Ulugbek Kamilov, Hanzhong Wang, Biao Li, Axel Rominger, Kuangyu Shi, Ge Wang, Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241797;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dose-aware diffusion model for 3D low-dose PET denoising: A multi-institutional validation with reader study and real low-dose data
Huidong Xie, Weijie Gan, Bo Zhou, Ming-Kai Chen, Michal Kulon, Annemarie Boustani, Xiongchao Chen, Qiong Liu, Xueqi Guo, Menghua Xia, Liang Guo, Hongyu An, Ulugbek Kamilov, Hanzhong Wang, Biao Li, Axel Rominger, Kuangyu Shi, Ge Wang, Chi Liu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241797;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PyTomography: Advancements in List-mode and Time-of-Flight PET Image Reconstruction
  • Pseudo-planar Generation from SPECT Projections using Artificial Count Enhancement in Lung Scintigraphy
  • Accelerating SPECT Imaging for Dosimetry via Projection Interpolation using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Image Generation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire