Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Data Analysis & Management

Usability of PETSIRD, the PET Raw Data open format of the Emission Tomography Standardization Initiative (ETSI): results from ETSI’s first hackathon

Nicolas Karakatsanis, David Atkinson, Camilo Buscaron, Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng, Aurélien Coussat, Daniel Deidda, Nikos Efthimiou, Ezzat Elmoujarkach, Fedor Goncharov, Fang Han, Michael Hansen, Markus Jehl, Nicole Jurjew, Adam Kesner, Eve Lennie, Aaron McFarland, Johan Nuyts, Luke Polson, Arman Rahmim, Erik Reimers, Georg Schramm, Imraj Singh, Georgios Soultanidis, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, John Stairs, Simon Stute, Maxime Toussaint, Robert Twyman, Hong Phuc Vo, R. Glenn Wells and Kris Thielemans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241285;
Nicolas Karakatsanis
1Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Atkinson
2University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camilo Buscaron
3Alafia AI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng
4The University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurélien Coussat
5Jagiellonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Deidda
6National Physical Laboratory
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikos Efthimiou
7Massachusetts General Hospital/Athinoula Martinos Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ezzat Elmoujarkach
8University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fedor Goncharov
9CEA Saclay (France)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fang Han
10University at Buffalo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Hansen
11Microsoft Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Jehl
12Positrigo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Jurjew
13University College London (UK)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Kesner
14Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eve Lennie
15University of Sheffield (UK)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron McFarland
16SynchroPET
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Nuyts
17KU Leuven (Belgium)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luke Polson
18University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arman Rahmim
18University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Reimers
18University of British Columbia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georg Schramm
19KU Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Imraj Singh
13University College London (UK)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgios Soultanidis
20BMEII, Icahn school of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Spangler-Bickell
21GE HealthCare
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Stairs
11Microsoft Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Stute
22University Hospital Nantes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxime Toussaint
23Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Twyman
24UCL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Phuc Vo
8University of Lübeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Glenn Wells
25University of Ottawa Heart Inst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kris Thielemans
13University College London (UK)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241285

Introduction: With the advent of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners of increasingly higher sensitivity alongside the evolving capacity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to support Nuclear Medicine, the opportunity for accessing high fidelity information through standardized PET raw data has become apparent. The Emission Tomography Standardization Initiative (ETSI) was founded in 2022 from an international consortium of nuclear medicine experts to define open, extendable, standardized and vendor-agnostic formats of emission tomography raw data. Currently, the initiative focuses on developing the PET ETSI Raw Data (PETSIRD) list-mode format comprised of (i) data elements (e.g. coincidence events, geometry, correction factors, etc.), (ii) a container describing the element’s structure and the protocols for access, storage and transfer using Microsoft Research YARDL meta-language, and (iii) a use-cases software library. We report on the progress of developing use-case applications for generating, accessing and processing PETSIRD data.

Methods: On November 13-14th 2023, ETSI organized its in Vancouver, BC, Canada, aiming at the development of proof-of-concept open-source software for PETSIRD use-cases to demonstrate its usability. A group of ~30 international participants from industry and academia worked together to produce software tools showcasing how to create, access and process PETSIRD data for well-defined user tasks in quantitative PET imaging. Specifically, four subgroups were formed to work on the following tasks: (1) apply split/merge, gating and sub-sampling operations on PETSIRD data according to a user-defined or physiological signal (e.g. ECG) input, (2) build a convertor from GATE Monte Carlo simulations output data in ROOT format to PETSIRD and subsequently generate simulated demo PETSIRD data from realistic Monte Carlo simulations, (3) add a PETSIRD read/write/processing interface within existing open-source reconstruction software, and (4) analytically simulate PETSIRD data from images as well as independently reconstruct PET images from PETSIRD data alone. In all use-cases, the highly versatile YARDL container model of PETSIRD was exploited.

Results: All four subgroups were able to make substantial progress during the 2-day hackathon and delivered useful and practical software tools demonstrating PETSIRD’s high usability and functionality. Specifically, subgroup 1 implemented tools for both sub-sampling and gating operations on PETSIRD data guided by external inputs. Subgroup 2 built a ROOT-to-PETSIRD converter, to be used as a possible roadmap for future converters from vendor proprietary formats to PETSIRD and generated realistic demo PETSIRD data of a simplified NEMA IEC phantom. Subgroup 3 added basic PETSIRD input/output interfaces to STIR, CASToR and PyTomography open-source libraries. Subgroup 4 used PARALLELPROJ’s open-source projectors to analytically generate synthetic PETSIRD data from images. Finally, subgroup 4 successfully reconstructed an estimate of the NEMA phantom PET image from the PETSIRD demo data of subgroup 2, thus independently validating the respective software of the two subgroups and the format’s capability to contain sufficient information for standalone reconstruction. The role of PETSIRD’s YARDL container was pivotal in all developments, as its automatic code generation capabilities in both C++ and Python enabled rapid software prototyping. Prototype PETSIRD definitions are available on . All code will be made available there.

Conclusions: The successful implementation of several practical and functional use cases during ETSI’s first hackathon demonstrated PETSIRD’s usability as a standalone, open-source, standardized PET list-mode data format. Moreover, it highlighted its value as a vendor- and scanner-agnostic standard to aid the development of novel and high-impact PET applications and analysis tools especially of those relying on data sharing and harmonization principles such as AI models.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Usability of PETSIRD, the PET Raw Data open format of the Emission Tomography Standardization Initiative (ETSI): results from ETSI’s first hackathon
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Usability of PETSIRD, the PET Raw Data open format of the Emission Tomography Standardization Initiative (ETSI): results from ETSI’s first hackathon
Nicolas Karakatsanis, David Atkinson, Camilo Buscaron, Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng, Aurélien Coussat, Daniel Deidda, Nikos Efthimiou, Ezzat Elmoujarkach, Fedor Goncharov, Fang Han, Michael Hansen, Markus Jehl, Nicole Jurjew, Adam Kesner, Eve Lennie, Aaron McFarland, Johan Nuyts, Luke Polson, Arman Rahmim, Erik Reimers, Georg Schramm, Imraj Singh, Georgios Soultanidis, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, John Stairs, Simon Stute, Maxime Toussaint, Robert Twyman, Hong Phuc Vo, R. Glenn Wells, Kris Thielemans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241285;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Usability of PETSIRD, the PET Raw Data open format of the Emission Tomography Standardization Initiative (ETSI): results from ETSI’s first hackathon
Nicolas Karakatsanis, David Atkinson, Camilo Buscaron, Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng, Aurélien Coussat, Daniel Deidda, Nikos Efthimiou, Ezzat Elmoujarkach, Fedor Goncharov, Fang Han, Michael Hansen, Markus Jehl, Nicole Jurjew, Adam Kesner, Eve Lennie, Aaron McFarland, Johan Nuyts, Luke Polson, Arman Rahmim, Erik Reimers, Georg Schramm, Imraj Singh, Georgios Soultanidis, Matthew Spangler-Bickell, John Stairs, Simon Stute, Maxime Toussaint, Robert Twyman, Hong Phuc Vo, R. Glenn Wells, Kris Thielemans
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241285;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The value of 18F-FDG PET/MR radiomic features in predicting the malignant degree of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous tumors(IPMN)
  • Validation of the lesion quantification of a learning-based PET image filter
  • Advanced Delay Correction Using TAC Integration and Newton-Raphson Method in Dynamic PET Imaging
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Data Analysis & Management

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire