Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Breast Cancer

Feasibility study of 68 Gallium-FAPI PET-CT in staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast: Comparison with FDG PET-CT.

Sayantani Sinha, Jayanta Das, Anirban Mukherjee, SOUMENDRANATH RAY, Bivas Biswas and Rosina Ahmed
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241179;
Sayantani Sinha
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayanta Das
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anirban Mukherjee
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOUMENDRANATH RAY
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bivas Biswas
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosina Ahmed
1Tata Medical Centre
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

241179

Introduction: Gallium 68 (68Ga)–labelled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) has recently been introduced as a promising tumour imaging agent. Initial reports suggested that gallium 68–labelled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor PET/CT may outperform fluorine 18–labelled fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in staging lung and breast cancer, particularly in the detection of metastasis to the brain, lymph nodes, bone, and pleura.

Objectives:

• To establish the imaging protocol and evaluate feasibility of Gallium 68–labelled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor PET/CT in newly diagnosed patients of carcinoma lung and carcinoma breast in our institution.

• To compare the role of Gallium 68 (68Ga)–labelled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET/CT with Fluorine 18–labelled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in staging of carcinoma lung and carcinoma breast.

Methods: The study was conducted in department of Nuclear Medicine of Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata in collaboration with department of Medical Oncology and Breast Oncology disease management group and department of Pathology. Sixteen patients, ten of primary lung malignancy and six of primary breast malignancy referred for FDG PET/CT for staging purpose was prospectively selected. Informed consent was taken from all the patients. The patients underwent 68-Ga FAPI PET/CT within 1 week of performing FDG PET/CT. Both the scans were visually evaluated for delineation of primary tumor and detection of suspected metastasis in lymph nodes & other visceral sites. Semi quantitative evaluation was performed by comparing SUVmax for reference lesions.

Results: Total 16 patients were recruited out of which 10 patients had primary lung malignancy and 6 patients had primary breast malignancy. Out of 16 patients 9 patients were female and 7 patients were male. Mean Age of the patients were 64.1 ± 11.1 years (Range 41-83 years). Concordant findings are noted in 8 out of 16 patients (50%) in both the imaging modalities. In rest of the patients, FAPI upstage the disease in 3 patients (18.75%), downstage the disease in 3 patients (18.75%). In remaining 2 patients (12.5%), FAPI show likely false negative uptake in mediastinal lymphnodes (1 patient) and adrenal glands (both patients). In lung carcinoma patients FAPI correctly changes the stage in 3 of 10 patients (30%) while it falsely downstage the disease in 2 of 10 patients (20%). In breast carcinoma patients it correctly changes the stage in 3 out of 6 patients (50%). SUVmax of primary breast malignancy is significantly higher for FAPI PET-CT when compared with FDG PET-CT (16.2 ± 3.9 vs 7.89 ± 4.1, p = 0.004). In most of the other lesions though FAPI PET-CT shows higher SUVmax value but it was not statistically significant due to small sample size.

Conclusions: Our initial experience suggests that FAPI PET-CT is feasible in primary staging of lung and breast carcinoma. It provides desirable performance with reasonably high accuracy in both the settings. When compared with FDG PET-CT it changes the stage of significant proportion of patients in both clinical scenarios which can further change the management. Metabolic parameter like SUVmax values are higher in most of the lesions in FAPI PET-CT when compared with FDG PET-CT which may be helpful for early detection of disease.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feasibility study of 68 Gallium-FAPI PET-CT in staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast: Comparison with FDG PET-CT.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Feasibility study of 68 Gallium-FAPI PET-CT in staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast: Comparison with FDG PET-CT.
Sayantani Sinha, Jayanta Das, Anirban Mukherjee, SOUMENDRANATH RAY, Bivas Biswas, Rosina Ahmed
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241179;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Feasibility study of 68 Gallium-FAPI PET-CT in staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast: Comparison with FDG PET-CT.
Sayantani Sinha, Jayanta Das, Anirban Mukherjee, SOUMENDRANATH RAY, Bivas Biswas, Rosina Ahmed
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2024, 65 (supplement 2) 241179;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • FAPI Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
  • 18F-AlF-LNC1007 in the evaluation of Breast cancer:comparison with 18F-FDG/18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT
  • Prognostic stratification of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients using PET-radiomic features from malignant and tumor-free regions
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Breast Cancer

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire