Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) PET Imaging of HER2-Low Breast Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025: Results from a Pilot Study

Renske Altena, Siri af Burén, August Blomgren, Emelie Karlsson, Antonios Tzortzakakis, Nikolai Brun, Mohammad M. Moein, Emma Jussing, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Jonas Bergh, Thuy A. Tran, Johan Hartman and Rimma Axelsson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2024, 65 (5) 700-707; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266847
Renske Altena
1Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden;
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siri af Burén
3Division of Radiology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
4Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
August Blomgren
4Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emelie Karlsson
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonios Tzortzakakis
3Division of Radiology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
4Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolai Brun
5Affibody AB, Solna, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad M. Moein
6Department of Radiopharmacy, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Jussing
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
6Department of Radiopharmacy, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrik Y. Frejd
5Affibody AB, Solna, Sweden;
7Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Bergh
1Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden;
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thuy A. Tran
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
6Department of Radiopharmacy, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Hartman
2Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;
8Department of Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rimma Axelsson
4Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Functional Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden;
9Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Flowchart of accrual and study-related investigations in pilot study of HER2 PET with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025 for patients with HER2-low mBC.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Maximum-intensity-projection values from all 10 patients included in pilot study of HER2 PET with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025. Pat = patient.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Correlation between HER2 IHC in biopsies of metastatic lesions and SUVmax on HER2 PET.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Representative images from patient with SUVmax of 24.9 and HER2 IHC score of 0 in biopsy specimen. Metastatic lesion in segment 3 of liver shows inhomogeneous intravenous contrast uptake due to central necrosis (arrows). Inhomogeneous nature of metastatic lesion was verified under ultrasound before biopsy. Liver biopsy (bottom right) shows status for HER2 IHC score of 0.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Disease heterogeneity noted on HER2 PET. Per patient, biopsied lesion, median SUVmax, and range of all tumor lesions measured on HER2 PET are indicated by thick black line. HER2 IHC result is also shown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Characteristics of Patients Included in Pilot Study, Previous Treatment, and Tumor Biology Features

    Previous metastatic biopsies
    PatientYear of birthYear of mBC diagnosisPrevious palliative systemic therapies in metastatic settingBreast cancer typePrevious biopsy siteER/PR/Ki-67HER2 IHCHER2 ISH
    119452015Letrozol, eribulin, paclitaxel, fulvestrant, exemestane + palbociclib, vinorelbinDuctalLiver100/100/1021.54
    Liver100/95/1722.4
    Liver100/0/1622.7
    219622022Newly diagnosed mBCDuctalPrimary tumor100/90/381
    319572016Anastrozole, fulvestrant + palbociclib, capecitabineDuctalLiver100/0/2521.0
    419662018Letrozole/palbociclib, PEGylated doxorubicin, tamoxifen, capecitabinDuctalLiver50/0/431+
    519722020Anastrozole/goserelin/palbociclib, fulvestrant/ribociclibLobularPrimary tumor (intracranial disease)100/70/202
    619742019Capecitabin, eribulin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, sacituzumab govitecanLobularBreast/skin0/0/101+
    719732018Fulvestrant/ribociclibDuctalBreast (relapse)80/0/322+2,3
    819492020Letrozole, fulvestrant/ribociclibDuctalBone100/0/300
    919632014Paclitaxel, letrozole, fulvestrant/ribociclib, capecitabinDuctalLiver90/5/1
    Bone100/50/10
    1019662020Eribulin, capecitabinLobularBone0/0/152–4/2–4/1.0
    • ER = estrogen receptor; PR = progesterone receptor.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Study-Related Findings from HER2 PET and Paired Tumor Biopsy in 10 Patients in HER2-Low Pilot Study

    HER2 PET/CT results
    SUV for spleenSUV for liver*SUV for left myocardiumStudy-specific biopsies
    PatientLesion site(s)SUVmax for tumorMaxMeanMaxMeanMaxMeanTBRSiteER/PR/Ki-67HER2 IHC biopsyHER2/C17 gene amplification quote
    1Liver12.92.61.99.17.83.12.26.8Liver100/100/191+2.85/1.0/2.85
    2Bone, lymph nodes6.13.92.613.77.04.43.02.3Lymph node0/0/951+
    3Liver28.73.01.8NANA4.12.615.9Liver80/70/NA2+3.3/2.3/1.4
    4Bone, liver10.75.03.3NANA3.22.23.2Liver80/70/781+4.4/2.5/1.76
    5Bone, liver24.93.92.613.410.24.12.99.6Liver30/0/600
    6Bone, skin, liver3.72.82.2NANA3.12.11.7Skin0/0/390
    7Breast, brain10.32.31.713.811.03.82.96.1Breast60/0/402+3.6/1.45/2.48
    8Liver33.42.72.113.39.74.13.015.9Liver95/0/32+1.3/1.8/0.7
    9Bone, liver19.03.02.3NANA3.73.08.3Liver95/95/132+2.25/1.55/1.45
    10Liver, bone12.02.71.6NANA2.71.87.5Liver0/0/332+2.65/1.35/1.96
    • ↵* Only given when possible to identify area without scatter from metastases in liver.

    • Max = maximum; NA = not available.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 5
May 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) PET Imaging of HER2-Low Breast Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025: Results from a Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) PET Imaging of HER2-Low Breast Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025: Results from a Pilot Study
Renske Altena, Siri af Burén, August Blomgren, Emelie Karlsson, Antonios Tzortzakakis, Nikolai Brun, Mohammad M. Moein, Emma Jussing, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Jonas Bergh, Thuy A. Tran, Johan Hartman, Rimma Axelsson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2024, 65 (5) 700-707; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266847

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) PET Imaging of HER2-Low Breast Cancer with [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025: Results from a Pilot Study
Renske Altena, Siri af Burén, August Blomgren, Emelie Karlsson, Antonios Tzortzakakis, Nikolai Brun, Mohammad M. Moein, Emma Jussing, Fredrik Y. Frejd, Jonas Bergh, Thuy A. Tran, Johan Hartman, Rimma Axelsson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2024, 65 (5) 700-707; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266847
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • Whole-Body HER2 Heterogeneity Identified on HER2 PET in HER2-Negative, -Low, and -Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 177Lu-PSMA-617 Consolidation Therapy After Docetaxel in Patients with Synchronous High-Volume Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase 2 Trial
  • Transarterial Radioembolization in the TACOME Trial: Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Features in Predicting Response and Overall Survival
  • Retreatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients with 223Ra Therapy in Daily Practice
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • HER2 PET
  • HER2-low breast cancer
  • [68Ga]Ga-ABY-025
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire