Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Dopamine Transporter SPECT with 12-Minute Scan Duration Using Multiple-Pinhole Collimators

Ralph Buchert, Balazs Szabo, Akos Kovacs, Thomas Buddenkotte, Franziska Mathies, Amir Karimzadeh, Wencke Lehnert, Susanne Klutmann, Attila Forgacs and Ivayla Apostolova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine March 2024, 65 (3) 446-452; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266276
Ralph Buchert
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Balazs Szabo
2Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akos Kovacs
2Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Buddenkotte
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franziska Mathies
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir Karimzadeh
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wencke Lehnert
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susanne Klutmann
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Attila Forgacs
2Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivayla Apostolova
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Standardized display for visual interpretation of 4 cases: 4-min scan considered too noisy for visual interpretation (upper left), 4-min scan interpreted as artificial because of barbell shape of left striatum (upper right), and two 30-min scans interpreted as neurodegeneration-typical reduction (lower left) and normal (lower right). Top of each panel shows 10 transversal distribution-volume-ratio slices of 4-mm thickness from superior to inferior edge of striatum with maximum of color table individually scaled to maximum intensity in 10 images. Bottom of each panel shows transversal distribution-volume-ratio image of 12-mm thickness through center of striatum with maximum of color table scaled to fixed upper distribution-volume-ratio threshold optimized previously.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) Results of visual interpretation. (B) Transversal 12-mm SPECT images with 4-min vs. 30-min scan durations for 4 representative cases: too noisy on 4-min scan (male, 83 y, 175 MBq, 210-min uptake period), artificial on 4-min scan (male, 81 y, 182 MBq, 188-min uptake period), intrareader discrepancy (normal vs. reduced) on 4-min scan (male, 68 y, 183 MBq, 177-min uptake period), and discrepant classification between 4-min (reduced) and 30-min (normal) scans (female, 77 y, 196 MBq, 268-min uptake period).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Representative examples in which scan duration had no relevant impact down to 4 min (transversal 12-mm images; top: female, 44 y, 200 MBq, 186-min uptake period; bottom: female, 72 y, 200 MBq, 220-min uptake period).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Scatterplots of unilateral putamen SBR (n = 1,280) with reduced vs. 30-min scan duration, and plot of R2. Dashed lines indicate R2 expected for putamen SBR from 2 short-term repeat DAT SPECT scans of same patient with 5% test–retest variability.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Histograms of putamen SBR (minimum of both hemispheres, n = 640), and effect size d of distance between 2 gaussian functions (according to Eq. 2). Fit by sum of 2 gaussians is indicated by continuous line. Remaining fit parameters are given in Supplemental Table 1. HV = hottest-voxels.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Balanced accuracy of network trained for automatic classification of MPH DAT SPECT with 30-min scan duration in same 213 test cases with varying scan duration.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 3
March 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dopamine Transporter SPECT with 12-Minute Scan Duration Using Multiple-Pinhole Collimators
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dopamine Transporter SPECT with 12-Minute Scan Duration Using Multiple-Pinhole Collimators
Ralph Buchert, Balazs Szabo, Akos Kovacs, Thomas Buddenkotte, Franziska Mathies, Amir Karimzadeh, Wencke Lehnert, Susanne Klutmann, Attila Forgacs, Ivayla Apostolova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2024, 65 (3) 446-452; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266276

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dopamine Transporter SPECT with 12-Minute Scan Duration Using Multiple-Pinhole Collimators
Ralph Buchert, Balazs Szabo, Akos Kovacs, Thomas Buddenkotte, Franziska Mathies, Amir Karimzadeh, Wencke Lehnert, Susanne Klutmann, Attila Forgacs, Ivayla Apostolova
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2024, 65 (3) 446-452; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266276
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Unrealistic Data Augmentation Improves the Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Classification of Dopamine Transporter SPECT Against Variability Between Sites and Between Cameras
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dopamine transporter
  • SPECT
  • ioflupane
  • multipinhole
  • scan duration
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire