Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticlePROCEDURE STANDARD

Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET

David Mankoff, Soňa Balogová, Lisa Dunnwald, Farrokh Dehdashti, Erik DeVries, Laura Evangelista, Michel Van Kruchten, Sofia Carrilho Vaz, Amy Fowler, Hannah Linden and Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine February 2024, 65 (2) 221-223; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266938
David Mankoff
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soňa Balogová
2Comenius University, St. Elisabeth Oncology Institute, and NNG Bory, Bratislava, Slovakia;
3AP-HP Hôpital Tenon, Université Sorbonne, Paris, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Dunnwald
4University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farrokh Dehdashti
5Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik DeVries
6University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Evangelista
7University of Padova, Padova, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Van Kruchten
6University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofia Carrilho Vaz
8Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal;
9Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Fowler
10University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Linden
11University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary A. Ulaner
12Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER), a steroid hormone receptor important in female physiology, is a significant contributor to breast carcinogenesis and progression and, as such, is an important therapeutic target. Approximately 70% of breast cancers will express ER at presentation, and the determination of ER expression by tissue assay, usually by immunohistochemistry, is part of the standard of care for newly diagnosed breast cancer. ER expression is important in guiding the approach to treatment, especially with the increase in relevant systemic therapies. The ER-targeting imaging agent 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol ([18F]FES) is approved for clinical use by regulatory agencies in France and the United States. Multiple studies suggest the advantages of [18F]FES PET in assessing tumor ER expression, the ability of both qualitative and quantitative [18F]FES PET measures to predict response to ER-targeted therapy, and the ability of [18F]FES PET to clarify equivocal staging and restaging results in patients with ER-expressing cancers. [18F]FES PET/CT may also be helpful in staging invasive lobular breast cancer and low-grade ER-expressing invasive ductal cancers and, in some cases, may be a substitute for biopsy. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine in June 2023 released a procedure standard/practice guideline for [18F]FES PET ER imaging of patients with breast cancer. The goal of the standard/guideline is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting, and reporting the results of [18F]FES PET studies for patients with breast cancer and to provide clinicians with the best available evidence, inform them about areas where robust evidence is lacking, and help them deliver the best possible diagnostic efficacy and study quality for their patients. Also reviewed are standardized quality control, quality assurance, and imaging procedures for [18F]FES PET. The authors emphasize the importance of precision, accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility for both clinical management of patients and for use of [18F]FES PET in multicenter trials. A standardized imaging procedure, in combination with already published appropriate-use criteria, will help promote the use of [18F]FES PET and enhance subsequent research. This brief summary article reviews the content of the joint standard/guideline, which is available in its entirety at https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/content.aspx?ItemNumber=6414&navItemNumbe=10790.

  • breast cancer
  • estrogen receptor imaging
  • practice guidelines
  • [18F]FES PET

Breast cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in women and remains an important cause of mortality. Systemic therapy of both early- and later-stage breast cancer is an important contributor to decreased breast cancer mortality, and advances in individualized and targeted therapy have improved outcomes and mitigated treatment toxicity. The estrogen receptor (ER), a steroid hormone receptor important in female physiology, is a significant contributor to breast carcinogenesis and progression and, as such, is a useful therapeutic target. Approximately 70% of breast cancers will express ER at presentation, and the determination of ER expression by tissue assay—most commonly using immunohistochemistry methods—is part of the standard of care of newly diagnosed breast cancer. ER expression carries both prognostic and predictive information and is important in guiding the approach to treatment, especially the use of ER-targeted systemic therapy. After a long development period and research by selective centers capable of generating novel imaging compounds, the ER-targeted PET imaging agent 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-estradiol ([18F]FES) was approved for clinical use by regulatory agencies in France and the United States. Support for the use of [18F]FES PET to diagnose ER-expressing breast cancer and guide ER-targeted therapy comes from several single-center studies and some recent prospective multicenter studies. These studies demonstrated the accuracy of [18F]FES PET in assessing tumor ER expression compared with tissue assay reference standards, the ability of both qualitative and quantitative measures of [18F]FES PET to predict response to ER-targeted therapy, and the ability of [18F]FES PET to clarify equivocal staging and restaging results in patients with ER-expressing cancers. More recent data have suggested that [18F]FES PET/CT may be helpful in the staging of invasive lobular breast cancer and low-grade ER-expressing invasive ductal cancers and may be a substitute for biopsy in some cases. More data are needed to better determine efficacy in these tasks.

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) in June 2023 released “SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET.” The goal of the guidance is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting, and reporting the results of [18F]FES PET studies for patients with breast cancer. The document aims to provide clinicians with the best available evidence, to inform them of where robust evidence is lacking, and to help them deliver the best possible diagnostic efficacy and study quality for their patients. The guideline also presents standardized quality control, quality assurance, and imaging procedures for [18F]FES PET. Adequate precision, accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of [18F]FES PET in multicenter trials. The availability of a standardized imaging procedure will help to promote the appropriate use of [18F]FES PET and enhance subsequent research. This brief summary reviews the content of the joint standard/guideline, which is available in its entirety, including extensive reference citations, at https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/content.aspx?ItemNumber=6414&navItemNumber=10790. The reader is referred to the complete guideline for appropriate limitations and considerations in applying these and similar practice guidelines.

DEFINITIONS AND COMMON CLINICAL INDICATIONS

The complete standard/guideline provides definitions of relevant terms, based on the EANM procedure guidelines for tumor PET imaging (version 2.0), including ranges of PET/CT anatomic focus. Common clinical indications, as previously detailed in SNMMI appropriate-use criteria (1), include assessing lesions that are difficult to biopsy or when biopsy is nondiagnostic, guiding therapy after progression of metastatic disease, guiding therapy at initial presentation of metastatic disease, and detecting ER-expressing breast cancer sites when other imaging tests have equivocal or suggestive results. Other emerging indications under investigation include detecting ER-expressing lesions in patients with suspected or known recurrent or metastatic breast cancer; assessing ER status, in lieu of biopsy, in lesions that are easily accessible for biopsy; staging invasive lobular breast cancer and low-grade ER-expressing invasive ductal cancer; and routine staging of ER-expressing extraaxillary nodes and distant metastases. Other studies suggest that [18F]FES PET can be used for detection and characterization of ER-expressing tumors other than breast cancer, such as ovarian and endometrial cancer.

The full standard/guideline details the qualifications and responsibilities of personnel performing [18F]FES PET imaging, including physicians, technologists, and medical physicists. An overview of [18F]FES properties and clinical pharmacology, as well as a review of [18F]FES biodistribution and dosimetry, is included.

PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS

The full standard/guideline provides comprehensive consensus specifications for practice. Detailed recommendations cover patient referral and selection through dosimetry, the imaging procedure, and both qualitative and quantitative interpretation and reporting of findings.

PATIENT SELECTION AND PREPARATION

Scheduling, including nuclear pharmacy ordering and patient preparation and precautions, is reviewed, along with a useful table of clinical information required at the time of referral. Special considerations for patients taking drugs that block the ER and reduce uptake of [18F]FES, such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, are noted, with suggested required periods of withdrawal from these agents before [18F]FES PET is attempted.

TRACER ADMINISTRATION AND IMAGING

The full standard/guideline details the administration process for [18F]FES, the recommended administered activity (varying between 111 and 280 MBq [3–7.6 mCi]), and the mechanisms and timing of uptake for optimal imaging (usually 20–80 min after injection, with a 60-min uptake time suggested). PET/CT image acquisition considerations are reviewed, including recommended scan ranges and optional concurrent acquisition of CT images with contrast, as well as image reconstruction and processing.

IMAGE INTERPRETATION AND REPORTING

The most detailed portion of the full standard/guideline addresses the process of image interpretation and reporting of findings, with relevant recommendations specific to [18F]FES breast imaging. Initial areas covered include technical details to be noted in the report and useful background information on expected [18F]FES biodistribution and uptake in areas relevant to interpretation.

Recommended descriptions of findings and summary impressions are reviewed in the guideline and are condensed here in Table 1. Considerations of specific relevance to [18F]FES and ER binding in determining and reporting both false-negative and false-positive findings are also addressed. Of special note are recommendations on reporting and interpreting quantitative measures, including what measures to record. Although qualitative assessment is usually sufficient to discriminate a positive from a negative scan, quantitative measurements may be of additional value. In particular, when qualitative assessment is equivocal, quantitative assessment can aid in defining whether a scan should be considered positive, although careful scanner calibration is needed to interpret SUV measures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Reporting ER Imaging of Breast Cancer Using [18F]FES PET/CT

Current findings on the potential of [18F]FES PET for quantitative prediction of treatment efficacy or failure and for serial assessment of ER-blocking drugs to assess the adequacy of receptor blockade are reviewed, as well as guidance in dosing of new drugs.

Correlative imaging, in addition to the CT component of PET/CT, is discussed as being especially important and helpful for guiding [18F]FES PET/CT interpretation and evaluation of ER heterogeneity. When [18F]FES PET is used in combination with correlative imaging that identifies sites of active disease, the combination can qualitatively assess the expression of ER in individual lesions and can therefore assess the heterogeneity of disease. This is one of several areas identified as needing further study. Overall, it is helpful to report [18F]FES PET/CT results in the context of contemporaneous [18F]FDG PET/CT results—both qualitatively and quantitatively—or the results of other conventional imaging.

SUMMARY

The complete “SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET” provides the first comprehensive professional consensus specifications for practice, from patient referral and selection through dosimetry, the imaging procedure, and both qualitative and quantitative interpretation and reporting of findings. The availability of a standardized imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate clinical use of [18F]FES PET and enhance subsequent research.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online Dec. 7, 2023.

  • © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ulaner GA,
    2. Mankoff DA,
    3. Clark AS,
    4. et al
    . Appropriate use criteria for estrogen receptor-targeted PET imaging with 16α-18F-fluoro-17β-fluoroestradiol. Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging website. https://www.snmmi.org/ClinicalPractice/content.aspx?ItemNumber=42023. Accessed November 9, 2023.
  • Received for publication October 24, 2023.
  • Revision received November 6, 2023.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 2
February 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET
David Mankoff, Soňa Balogová, Lisa Dunnwald, Farrokh Dehdashti, Erik DeVries, Laura Evangelista, Michel Van Kruchten, Sofia Carrilho Vaz, Amy Fowler, Hannah Linden, Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2024, 65 (2) 221-223; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266938

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Summary: SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Estrogen Receptor Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-Estradiol PET
David Mankoff, Soňa Balogová, Lisa Dunnwald, Farrokh Dehdashti, Erik DeVries, Laura Evangelista, Michel Van Kruchten, Sofia Carrilho Vaz, Amy Fowler, Hannah Linden, Gary A. Ulaner
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Feb 2024, 65 (2) 221-223; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266938
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DEFINITIONS AND COMMON CLINICAL INDICATIONS
    • PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS
    • PATIENT SELECTION AND PREPARATION
    • TRACER ADMINISTRATION AND IMAGING
    • IMAGE INTERPRETATION AND REPORTING
    • SUMMARY
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Intrapatient 16{alpha}-[18F]Fluoro-17{beta}-Estradiol PET Heterogeneity as a Prognostic Factor for Endocrine Therapy Response and Survival in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors
Show more Procedure Standard

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • estrogen receptor imaging
  • practice guidelines
  • [18F]FES PET
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire