Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for Predicting Pathologic Response of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab and Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Yinjun Dong, Zhendan Wang, Xinying Hu, Yuhong Sun, Jingjie Qin, Qiming Qin, Shuguang Liu, Shuanghu Yuan, Jinming Yu and Yuchun Wei
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2024, 65 (11) 1702-1709; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.268557
Yinjun Dong
1Department of Esophageal Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhendan Wang
2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinying Hu
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuhong Sun
4Department of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingjie Qin
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiming Qin
1Department of Esophageal Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuguang Liu
1Department of Esophageal Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuanghu Yuan
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
5Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinming Yu
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuchun Wei
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Study flowchart. CCRT = concurrent chemoradiotherapy; MPR = major pathologic response.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A–E) Representative 18F-FAPI PET/CT scans for 5 study participants who experienced good response to treatment. Images show that tracer uptake is significantly decreased or close to background level after nCC. (F–J) Representative 18F-FAPI PET/CT scans for 5 study participants who experienced poor response to treatment. Images show slight decreases in tracer uptake after neoadjuvant therapy. Arrows indicate foci.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Correlations between 18F-FAPI PET/CT parameters and TRG (Spearman coefficient) at baseline and after treatment. Red represents positive correlation between 2 variables, and blue represents negative correlation. Stronger correlations are in darker colors. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Receiver operating characteristic curves for assessing predictive accuracy of SUVs on 18F-FAPI PET/CT for identifying good and poor pathologic responders to nCC among participants with LA-ESCC. SUVmax2 = SUVmax after nCC; SUVpeak2 = SUVpeak after nCC; SUVmean2 = SUVmean after nCC; TBRmax2 = ratio of SUVmax to SUVmean of blood after nCC; TBRmean2 = ratio of SUVmean to SUVmean of blood after nCC.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Patients

    CharacteristicAll patients (n = 32)Good response group (n = 16)Poor response group (n = 16)
    Age at enrollment (y)
     Mean ± SD64.53 ± 5.6165.25 ± 5.3463.81 ± 5.96
     Median and range65 (53–74)65.5 (57–74)63.5 (53–73)
    Sex
     Male291316
     Female330
    SCC histologic type321616
    Pathologic tumor staging
     ypT014122
     ypT1642
     ypT2303
     ypT3808
     ypT4101
    Pathologic lymph node staging
     ypN022148
     ypN1927
     ypN2101
    Degree of differentiation
     Well303
     Moderate624
     Poor927
     Not applicable14122
    Tumor regression grade
     014122
     1541
     2909
     3404
    Pathologic response
     pCR10100
     Major pathologic response660
     Other16016
    PD-L1 status*
     TPS < 11019
     TPS ≥ 116124
     Unknown633
    18F-FAPI PET/CT scans available
     Baseline and after231211
     Only baseline321616
    • ↵* PD-L1 status was evaluated by TPS determined using Dako 22C3 antibody.

    • SCC = squamous cell carcinoma; TPS = tumor proportion score.

    • Data are number, except for age.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Comparison of 18F-FAPI PET/CT Parameters at Baseline and After Neoadjuvant Therapy

    ParameterBaselineAfter neoadjuvant therapyP
    SUVmax11.81 (9.12–15.49)5.48 ± 3.52<0.001
    SUVpeak8.11 (5.97–11.64)3.76 ± 2.63<0.001
    SUVmean6.29 (4.57–8.57)2.62 ± 2.02<0.001
    TBRmax11.24 (10.11–14.14)5.67 ± 3.13<0.001
    TBRmean5.80 (5.35–7.79)2.70 ± 1.81<0.001
    • Data are median and range or mean ± SD (n = 23).

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Comparison of 18F-FAPI PET/CT Parameters at Different Time Points Between Patient Groups with Good and Poor Responses to nCC

    BaselineAfter neoadjuvant therapyChange with treatment
    ParameterGood response (n = 16)Poor response (n = 16)PGood response (n = 12)Poor response (n = 11)PGood response (n = 12)Poor response (n = 11)P
    SUVmax12.90 (10.88–16.05)12.31 (9.12–15.49)0.3693.61 (2.23–4.75)6.85 (4.92–8.62)0.0119.71 (8.35–22.88)2.56 (−0.52–7.53)0.009
    SUVpeak9.57 (8.08–12.08)8.67 (5.97–11.33)0.3592.10 (1.54–3.04)4.82 (3.14–5.73)0.0117.48 (5.86–9.79)1.35 (−0.04–5.92)0.009
    SUVmean6.84 (5.84–9.05)6.92 (4.59–8.57)0.4631.55 (1.05–2.05)3.12 (2.20–4.19)0.0095.53 (4.27–7.33)1.55 (0.08–4.50)0.012
    TBRmax11.97 (10.25–13.97)13.04 (10.74–16.39)0.4923.95 (2.79–4.42)6.84 (5.63–9.28)0.0017.63 (6.14–9.99)3.16 (1.43–8.59)0.035
    TBRmean6.50 (5.39–7.43)7.26 (5.60–9.18)0.4981.77 (1.29–1.90)3.18 (2.52–4.56)0.0034.27 (3.77–5.67)1.91 (0.74–4.79)0.039
    TLF146.70 (91.26–246.19)220.03 (110.46–318.02)0.83——————
    MTV23.95 (17.92–30.97)34.92 (13.58–51.94)0.391——————
    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Performance of PET Parameters in Prediction of Pathologic Response to nCC

    ParameterAUCPThresholdSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)95% CI
    SUVmax20.870.00266.4163.641000.73–1.0
    TBRmax20.860.00315.1281.8291.670.70–1.0
    SUVpeak20.890.00173.0781.8283.330.75–1.0
    SUVmean20.880.00212.1481.8283.330.74–1.0
    TBRmean20.880.00212.1781.8291.670.73–1.0
    ΔSUVmax0.810.01167.9181.8283.330.63–0.99
    ΔTBRmax0.740.05644.4763.6491.670.52–0.95
    ΔSUVpeak0.820.00975.1972.7383.330.64–0.99
    ΔSUVmean0.810.01164.5981.82750.63–0.99
    ΔTBRmean0.740.04892.7363.6491.670.52–0.96
    • SUVmax2 = SUVmax after nCC; SUVpeak2 = SUVpeak after nCC; SUVmean2 = SUVmean after nCC; TBRmax2 = ratio of SUVmax to SUVmean of blood after nCC; TBRmean2 = ratio of SUVmean to SUVmean of blood after nCC.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 65 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 65, Issue 11
November 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for Predicting Pathologic Response of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab and Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for Predicting Pathologic Response of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab and Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Yinjun Dong, Zhendan Wang, Xinying Hu, Yuhong Sun, Jingjie Qin, Qiming Qin, Shuguang Liu, Shuanghu Yuan, Jinming Yu, Yuchun Wei
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2024, 65 (11) 1702-1709; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268557

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
[18F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for Predicting Pathologic Response of Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma to Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab and Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Yinjun Dong, Zhendan Wang, Xinying Hu, Yuhong Sun, Jingjie Qin, Qiming Qin, Shuguang Liu, Shuanghu Yuan, Jinming Yu, Yuchun Wei
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2024, 65 (11) 1702-1709; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268557
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  • FAPI
  • neoadjuvant
  • pathologic response
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire