Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPhysics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Instrumentation

NEMA Performance Characteristics of the UHR Brain PET Scanner

Roger Lecomte, Étienne Auger, Francis Loignon-Houle, Maxime Toussaint, Vincent Doyon, Christian Thibaudeau, Jean-François Beaudoin, Etienne croteau, Jean-Daniel Leroux, Maxime Gaudreault, Arnaud Samson, Louis Arpin, Jonathan Bouchard, Romain Espagnet, Louis-Michel Collin, Marc-André Hachey, Danaë Dufour-Forget, Konin Koua, Joël Lemay, Nicolas Viscogliosi, Catherine Pepin, Vincent Labrecque, Caroline Paulin, Thibault Marin, Marc Normandin, Marc-André Tétrault, Jean-Baptiste Michaud, Georges El Fakhri and Réjean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P711;
Roger Lecomte
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Étienne Auger
2IR&T Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Loignon-Houle
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxime Toussaint
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Doyon
3Universite De Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Thibaudeau
2IR&T Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-François Beaudoin
4CIMS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etienne croteau
5Sherbrooke University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Daniel Leroux
6Novalgo Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maxime Gaudreault
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnaud Samson
7GRAMS - Universite de sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis Arpin
2IR&T Inc.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Bouchard
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Romain Espagnet
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louis-Michel Collin
8IR&T
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc-André Hachey
9IR&T Inc. / CIMS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danaë Dufour-Forget
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Konin Koua
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joël Lemay
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Viscogliosi
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Pepin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Labrecque
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Paulin
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thibault Marin
10Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Normandin
11Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc-André Tétrault
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Baptiste Michaud
1Université de Sherbrooke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georges El Fakhri
10Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Réjean Fontaine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

P711

Introduction: Spatial resolution plays a key role in cerebral PET imaging to resolve small structures of the human brain. We report the performance characteristics of the Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) PET scanner, pursuing the physical limit of spatial resolution to produce PET images of the human brain with an unparalleled level of detail.

Methods: The basic LabPET II detector unit of the UHR scanner is a 4 x 8 array of 1.125 x 1.125 x 12 mm³ LYSO:Ce crystal pixels, independently coupled to a 4 x 8 monolithic array of 1.1 x 1.1 mm² APDs at a 1.2 mm pitch. Detection modules are made from assembling four of these basic detector units in a 2 x 2 configuration. The 128-channel front-end electronic modules include two 64-channel mixed analog/digital ASICs to digitize the signals using a time-over-threshold technique. The UHR consists of 56 radially inserted cassettes, each holding 18 detection modules along the axial direction, for a total of 129,024 independent pixel detectors arranged as a cylinder measuring 398 mm in diameter by 235 mm in length (fig. 1). Ethernet links transfer single events, physiological and motion data to the acquisition computer where the list-mode events are merged and sorted in real-time by a software coincidence engine. Image reconstruction is done using 3D-OSEM algorithm implementing analytical PSF modeling.

The performance characterization of the UHR was done using a mix of the NEMA NU 4-2008 and NU 2-2018 standards, as a brain scanner finds itself somewhere between preclinical and whole-body clinical tomographs in terms of size. The sensitivity, count rate capabilities, spatial resolution and imaging performance in phantoms and humans were all measured using a 350-650 keV energy window and a 5.3 ns time window, unless otherwise specified.

Results: The reconstructed images of the Mini Deluxe phantom (fig. 2) exhibit a 74% resolvability for the smallest 1.2 mm rods at a radial position of 0 cm, and a 100% resolvability for the other sectors (1.6, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0 and 4.8 mm). At a radial position of 5 cm, 1.2 mm rods have a 58% resolvability, which goes up to 95% for the 1.6 mm rods.

These resolvability results are coherent with the spatial resolution of 1.28 mm measured with a point source at the center of the scanner. This preliminary value obtained with a suboptimal single-ray Siddon projector was measured by adding a uniform warm background to the source (10:11 ratio) to avoid artificial enhancement of the spatial resolution.

Images of the smaller Ultra-Micro Hot Spot phantom, of the NEMA NU 4-2008 IQ phantom (fig. 3) and of a modified Jaszczak clinical phantom with 12 hot spheres of 2 to 37 mm diameter will also be analyzed and presented, as well as the count rates performance.

The sensitivity peaks at 1.1% at the axial center of the scanner and increases to 2.3% using a wider 200-650 keV energy window (with rejection of all inter-crystal scatter events).

Human brain images obtained with the UHR show very well resolved cortex circumvolutions and higher contrast for several cortical and subcortical structures usually not resolved in PET images. For a patient having a medically prescribed scan on a GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner for probable multiple system atrophy and search for cerebellar metastases, the UHR images revealed focal uptakes that were not seen with the clinical scanner (fig. 4).

Conclusions: The target resolution performance of the UHR brain PET scanner was confirmed by physical measurements and imaging data. Resolving smaller structures with a lower partial-volume effect enhances contrast and could enable detecting neurological diseases closer to their true developmental onset. The sensitivity remains a limiting factor due to the truly pixelated detectors and the rejection of inter-crystal scatter events. However, recovery of triple events is possible and undergoing investigation. Further improvement of image accuracy is expected with the implementation of real-time tracking and correction for patient motion.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
NEMA Performance Characteristics of the UHR Brain PET Scanner
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
NEMA Performance Characteristics of the UHR Brain PET Scanner
Roger Lecomte, Étienne Auger, Francis Loignon-Houle, Maxime Toussaint, Vincent Doyon, Christian Thibaudeau, Jean-François Beaudoin, Etienne croteau, Jean-Daniel Leroux, Maxime Gaudreault, Arnaud Samson, Louis Arpin, Jonathan Bouchard, Romain Espagnet, Louis-Michel Collin, Marc-André Hachey, Danaë Dufour-Forget, Konin Koua, Joël Lemay, Nicolas Viscogliosi, Catherine Pepin, Vincent Labrecque, Caroline Paulin, Thibault Marin, Marc Normandin, Marc-André Tétrault, Jean-Baptiste Michaud, Georges El Fakhri, Réjean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P711;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
NEMA Performance Characteristics of the UHR Brain PET Scanner
Roger Lecomte, Étienne Auger, Francis Loignon-Houle, Maxime Toussaint, Vincent Doyon, Christian Thibaudeau, Jean-François Beaudoin, Etienne croteau, Jean-Daniel Leroux, Maxime Gaudreault, Arnaud Samson, Louis Arpin, Jonathan Bouchard, Romain Espagnet, Louis-Michel Collin, Marc-André Hachey, Danaë Dufour-Forget, Konin Koua, Joël Lemay, Nicolas Viscogliosi, Catherine Pepin, Vincent Labrecque, Caroline Paulin, Thibault Marin, Marc Normandin, Marc-André Tétrault, Jean-Baptiste Michaud, Georges El Fakhri, Réjean Fontaine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P711;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-time Simulation of AdaptiSPECT-C
  • Initial Results of an AWSM-PET Device for Augmented Whole-body PET Imaging
  • A multimodal approach to functional neuroimaging: Integrating eye-tracking and heart rate monitoring with ultra-high performance upright Prism-PET brain scanner
Show more Physics, Instrumentation & Data Sciences - Instrumentation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire