Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Breast Cancer

68Ga-labeled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in the clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT

Wei Guo, Hao Fu, Yizhen Pang, Long Sun, Hua Wu and Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P329;
Wei Guo
1The first affiliated hospital of Xiamen University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hao Fu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yizhen Pang
2Xiamen University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Long Sun
3Department of Nuclear MedicineThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hua Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Haojun Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

P329

Introduction: In recent years, quinoline-based fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) have shown promising results in the diagnosis of cancer. PET imaging using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI shows a greater tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) than [18F]FDG in various types of cancer, particularly in breast cancer. However, the further clinic role of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in the detection, staging/re-staging, and cancer management of breast cancer have not been systematically investigated. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in primary and metastatic breast cancer and compare the results with those of standard-of-care imaging (SCI) and [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Methods: This was a single-centre post-hoc retrospective study of a sub-cohort of patients from a previously acquired database. Patients with diagnosed or suspected breast cancer who underwent concomitant [68Ga]Ga-FAPI (FAPI-46) and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans from October 2019 to March 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Breast ultrasound (US) imaging was performed in all treatment-naïve patients as SCI. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax),TBR, lesion detection rate, and tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications between [68Ga]Ga-FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT were evaluated, and compared.

Results: Twenty-eight women (median age, 52.5 y; range, 28–80 y) were included. Among them, 5 patients underwent evaluation for a definitive diagnosis of suspected breast lesions, 9 underwent initial staging, and 14 were evaluated for the detection of recurrence. The sensitivities of breast US, [18F]FDG, and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT for detecting primary breast tumours were 80%, 70%, and 100%, respectively. Regarding the patient-based tumour detectability, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI was superior to [18F]FDG PET for primary tumour detection (92% [12/13] vs. 85% [11/13], p=1.000), local recurrence or metastases (100% [21/21] vs. 81% [17/21], p=0.125), neck lymph node (LN) metastases (100% [4/4] vs. 50% [2/4], p=0.500), abdomen LN metastases (100% [4/4] vs. 25% [1/4], p=0.250), bone metastases (100% [12/12] vs. 83% [10/12] , p=0.500) and liver metastases (100% [6/6] vs. 50% [3/6], p=0.250). Regarding the diagnosis of recurrent/metastatic lesions, the per-lesion detection rate of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG, which including local and regional recurrence (128 vs. 88), neck LN metastases (33 vs. 15), abdomen LN metastases (28 vs. 3), bone metastases (146 vs. 59), and liver metastases (28 vs. 11). Compared with [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT upstaged five patients’TNM staging/re-staging (7/27, 26%) and changed five patients’clinical management (5/27, 19%). Compared to SCI, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI upstaged ten patients' TNM staging/re-staging (9/27, 33%) and changed the therapeutic regimen of seven patients (7/27, 26%). There was no significant association between FAPI-derived SUVmax and receptor status/histologic type in both primary and metastatic lesions.

Conclusions: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT was superior to [18F]FDG in diagnosing primary and metastatic breast cancer, with higher radiotracer uptake and TBR, especially in the detection of primary/recurrent tumour, abdominal LN metastases, liver, and bone metastases. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT is superior to [18F]FDG and SCI in TNM staging and may improve tumour staging, recurrence detection, and implementation of necessary treatment modifications.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
68Ga-labeled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in the clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
68Ga-labeled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in the clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT
Wei Guo, Hao Fu, Yizhen Pang, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P329;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
68Ga-labeled Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT in the clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT
Wei Guo, Hao Fu, Yizhen Pang, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Haojun Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) P329;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • FAPI Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
  • 18F-AlF-LNC1007 in the evaluation of Breast cancer:comparison with 18F-FDG/18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT
  • Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate Safety, Dosimetry, and PD of the HER2-Directed Radioligand CAM-H2 in Patients With Advanced HER2+ Breast, Gastric, GEJ, and Other HER2+ Solid Tumors (trial ID: NCT04467515)
Show more Oncology: Clinical Therapy & Diagnosis (includes Phase 2, Phase 3, post approval studies) - Breast Cancer

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire