Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Lack of Adherence to Guideline-Based Imaging Before Subsequent Radiation in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Patient Outcomes

Emily Sterbis, Rifei Liang, Premal Trivedi, Jennifer Kwak, Erica Cohen Major, Sana D. Karam and Rustain L. Morgan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2023, 64 (1) 75-81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264131
Emily Sterbis
1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rifei Liang
2University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado–Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Premal Trivedi
1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Kwak
1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Cohen Major
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sana D. Karam
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rustain L. Morgan
1Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Impact of imaging modality (CT/CTA alone vs. any PET) on 3-y overall (left) and cancer-specific (right) survival in patients with NSCLC, according to SEER, 2007–1015.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Characteristics by Imaging Modality Before Subsequent RT of NSCLC Patients

    CharacteristicTotalCT/CTA aloneAny PETP
    All patients5,0172,1882,829
    Race/ethnicity category
     White NH4,223 (84.2)1,786 (81.6)2,437 (86.1)<0.0001*
     Black NH337 (6.7)183 (8.4)154 (5.4)
     Hispanic179 (3.6)80 (3.7)99 (3.5)
     Other/unknown278 (5.5)139 (6.4)139 (4.9)
    Patient region at diagnosis
     East1,061 (21.1)493 (22.5)568 (20.1)0.0215*
     Midwest617 (12.3)285 (13.0)332 (11.7)
     South1,510 (30.1)618 (28.2)892 (31.5)
     West1,829 (36.5)792 (36.2)1,037 (36.7)
    Facility type
     National Cancer Institute center605 (12.1)296 (13.5)309 (10.9)0.0179*
     Teaching hospital2,021 (40.3)873 (39.9)1,148 (40.6)
     Other/no hospital2,391 (47.7)1,019 (46.6)1,372 (48.5)
    Derived AJCC stage group, sixth edition
     Stage I1,597 (31.8)518 (23.7)1,079 (38.1)<0.0001*
     Stage II472 (9.4)160 (7.3)312 (11.0)
     Stage III1,511 (30.1)675 (30.9)836 (29.6)
     Stage IVA1,437 (28.6)835 (38.2)602 (21.3)
    Initial treatment
     RT943 (18.8)385 (17.6)558 (19.7)<0.0001*
     Surgery1,217 (24.3)421 (19.2)796 (28.1)
     Chemotherapy659 (13.1)402 (18.4)257 (9.1)
     Surgery and RT112 (2.2)39 (1.8)73 (2.6)
     Chemotherapy and RT1,348 (26.9)676 (30.9)672 (23.8)
     Chemotherapy and surgery488 (9.7)158 (7.2)330 (11.7)
     Chemotherapy, surgery, and RT250 (5.0)107 (4.9)143 (5.1)
    Diagnostic imaging category
     CT/CTA alone531 (10.6)285 (13.0)246 (8.7)<0.0001*
     Any PET4,440 (88.5)1,885 (86.2)2,555 (90.3)
     No related imaging46 (0.9)18 (0.8)28 (1.0)
    Histologic subtype of NSCLC
     Adenocarcinoma2,546 (50.7)1,157 (52.9)1,389 (49.1)<0.0001*
     Adenosquamous120 (2.4)47 (2.1)73 (2.6)
     Large cell carcinoma117 (2.3)54 (2.5)63 (2.2)
     Neuroendocrine89 (1.8)57 (2.6)32 (1.1)
     Squamous cell carcinoma1,542 (30.7)601 (27.5)941 (33.3)
     Other/not specified603 (12.0)272 (12.4)331 (11.7)
    • ↵* Statistically significant (P < 0.05).

    • NH = non-Hispanic; AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

    • Data are n followed by percentage in parentheses.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Logistic Regression Predicting Whether Patients Received PET

    CharacteristicORPGlobal P
    Race/ethnicity category
     White NH (ref)0.0044*
     Black NH vs. White NH0.688 (0.54–0.88)0.0023*
     Hispanic vs. White NH0.958 (0.70–1.32)0.7944
     Other/unknown vs. White NH0.752 (0.58–0.98)0.0336*
    Patient region at diagnosis
     West (ref)0.0374*
     East vs. west0.799 (0.67–0.95)0.0111*
     Midwest vs. west0.856 (0.70–1.05)0.1390
     South vs. west0.996 (0.85–1.17)0.9655
    Derived AJCC stage group, sixth edition
     Stage I (ref)<0.0001*
     Stage II vs. stage I0.880 (0.70–1.11)0.2769
     Stage III vs. stage I0.695 (0.58–0.83)<0.0001*
     Stage IVA vs. stage I0.455 (0.38–0.55)<0.0001*
    Initial treatment
    RT (ref)<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy vs. RT0.625 (0.50–0.78)<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy and RT vs. RT0.827 (0.69–1.00)0.0464*
     Chemotherapy and surgery vs. RT1.337 (1.04–1.72)0.0223*
     Chemotherapy, surgery, and RT vs. RT0.969 (0.72–1.31)0.8356
     Surgery vs. RT1.093 (0.90–1.33)0.3676
     Surgery and RT vs. RT1.259 (0.83–1.92)0.2843
    Diagnostic imaging category
     Any PET (ref)0.0002*
     CT/CTA alone vs. any PET0.673 (0.56–0.81)<0.0001*
     No related imaging vs. any PET1.178 (0.64–2.18)0.6019
    Histologic subtype of NSCLC
     Adenocarcinoma (ref)0.0183*
     Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma1.065 (0.72–1.57)0.7528
     Large cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma0.920 (0.62–1.35)0.6718
     Neuroendocrine vs. adenocarcinoma0.576 (0.36–0.91)0.0187*
     Squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma1.176 (1.02–1.35)0.0212*
     Other/not specified vs. adenocarcinoma1.148 (0.95–1.39)0.1537
    • ↵* Statistically significant (P < 0.05).

    • NH = non-Hispanic; AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

    • Data in parentheses are 95% CIs.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Multivariate Analysis of Survival at 3-Year Follow-Up

    Overall survivalCancer-specific survival
    CharacteristicHazard ratioPGlobal PHazard ratioPGlobal P
    Age category (y)
     66–69 (ref)0.0066*0.0079*
     70–740.988 (0.90–1.08)0.79920.940 (0.85–1.04)0.2436
     ≥751.115 (1.02–1.22)0.0157*1.089 (0.99–1.20)0.0901
    Sex
     Male (ref)0.0012*0.0008*
     Female0.886 (0.82–0.95)0.0012*0.869 (0.80–0.94)0.0008*
    Facility type
     National Cancer Institute center (ref)0.0174*0.0191*
     Other/no hospital1.151 (1.02–1.30)0.0205*1.164 (1.02–1.33)0.0280*
     Teaching hospital1.050 (0.93–1.18)0.42131.047 (0.91– 0.20)0.5064
    Derived AJCC stage group, sixth edition
     Stage I (ref)<0.0001*<0.0001*
     Stage II1.906 (1.62–2.25)<0.0001*1.920 (1.59–2.31)<0.0001*
     Stage III2.057 (1.67–2.54)<0.0001*2.135 (1.70–2.69)<0.0001*
     Stage IVA2.810 (2.11–3.74)<0.0001*2.846 (2.08–3.89)<0.0001*
    Initial treatment
     Radiation (ref)<0.0001*<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy0.681 (0.58–0.80)<0.0001*0.696 (0.58–0.83)<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy and RT0.533 (0.42–0.67)<0.0001*0.537 (0.42–0.69)<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy and surgery0.278 (0.20–0.38)<0.0001*0.272 (0.19–0.38)<0.0001*
     Chemotherapy, surgery, and RT0.337 (0.23–0.49)<0.0001*0.330 (0.22–0.50)<0.0001*
     Surgery0.673 (0.59–0.76)<0.0001*0.675 (0.58–0.78)<0.0001*
     Surgery and RT0.466 (0.34–0.63)<0.0001*0.415 (0.29–0.59)<0.0001*
    Histologic subtype of NSCLC
     Adenocarcinoma (ref)<0.0001*0.0005*
     Adenosquamous1.471 (1.17–1.85)0.0010*1.392 (1.07–1.81)0.0138*
     Large cell carcinoma1.416 (1.11–1.81)0.0059*1.315 (1.00–1.72)0.0470*
     Neuroendocrine1.375 (1.02–1.85)0.0342*1.455 (1.05–2.01)0.0232*
     Squamous cell carcinoma1.719 (1.40–2.11)<0.0001*1.644 (1.32–2.05)<0.0001*
     Other/not specified1.728 (1.34–2.23)<0.0001*1.687 (1.28–2.22)0.0002*
    Diagnostic imaging category
     Any PET (ref)<0.0001*0.0001*
     CT/CTA alone2.089 (1.55–2.81)<0.0001*1.986 (1.45–2.73)<0.0001*
     No related imaging0.438 (0.27–0.72)0.0011*0.448 (0.26–0.77)0.0039*
    Imaging category before subsequent RT
     Any PET (ref)<0.0001*<0.0001*
     CT/CTA alone1.417 (1.32–1.52)<0.0001*1.430 (1.32–1.55)<0.0001*
    • ↵* Statistically significant (P < 0.05).

    • AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

    • Hazard ratios are lower confidence limit to upper confidence limit.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 64 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue 1
January 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lack of Adherence to Guideline-Based Imaging Before Subsequent Radiation in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Patient Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Lack of Adherence to Guideline-Based Imaging Before Subsequent Radiation in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Patient Outcomes
Emily Sterbis, Rifei Liang, Premal Trivedi, Jennifer Kwak, Erica Cohen Major, Sana D. Karam, Rustain L. Morgan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2023, 64 (1) 75-81; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264131

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lack of Adherence to Guideline-Based Imaging Before Subsequent Radiation in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Patient Outcomes
Emily Sterbis, Rifei Liang, Premal Trivedi, Jennifer Kwak, Erica Cohen Major, Sana D. Karam, Rustain L. Morgan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2023, 64 (1) 75-81; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264131
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First-in-Human Study of 18F-Labeled PET Tracer for Glutamate AMPA Receptor [18F]K-40: A Derivative of [11C]K-2
  • Detection of HER2-Low Lesions Using HER2-Targeted PET Imaging in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Paired HER2 PET and Tumor Biopsy Analysis
  • [11C]Carfentanil PET Whole-Body Imaging of μ-Opioid Receptors: A First in-Human Study
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET/CT
  • surveillance
  • radiation therapy
  • non–small cell lung cancer
  • guidelines
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire