Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportClinical Science

External Validation of the CRAX2MACE model

Waseem Hijazi, William Leslie, Neil Filipchuk, Ryan Choo, Stephen Wilton, Matthew James, Piotr Slomka and Robert Miller
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3380;
Waseem Hijazi
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Leslie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Filipchuk
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Choo
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Wilton
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew James
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piotr Slomka
2Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Miller
1University of Calgary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3380

Introduction: Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is frequently used to predict the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The CRAX2MACE score was designed to predict the 2-year risk of MACE (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI] and late coronary revascularization) by combining clinical risk factors with SPECT MPI results in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Given the dependence of CRAX2MACE performance on population characteristics, we performed an external validation of CRAX2MACE using local data.

Methods: Patients with suspected CAD who underwent SPECT MPI between 2014 and 2018 with follow-up for MACE were included (N=2319). The prediction performance for MACE within 2-years for CRAX2MACE was compared with stress and ischemic total perfusion deficit (TPD) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed with calibration plots, Brier score and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Results: MACE occurred within 2 years in 158 (6.8%) patients. The AUC for predicting MACE at 2-years for CRAX2MACE was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68 – 0.76) and was significantly higher than stress TPD (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.62 – 0.71) and ischemic TPD (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.58 – 0.67, p<0.01 for both, Figure A). The model had acceptable goodness-of-fit (p=0.103) and was well-calibrated with a Brier score of 0.061 (Figure B). The AUC for prediction of MI or all-cause mortality at 2-years was also higher for CRAX2MACE (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76) compared to stress TPD (AUC 0.64, 95% CI 0.59 – 0.69) or ischemic TPD (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.57 – 0.66, both p<0.01) Figure C.

Conclusions: CRAX2MACE had higher predictive performance for 2-year MACE and 2-year MI or all-cause mortality than quantitative perfusion in an external population. The model also demonstrated good calibration. Adaptation of the model with the use of machine learning or incorporation of calcium scoring may further improve its performance; however, it currently benefits from its simplicity and ease of application to routine patient care.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
External Validation of the CRAX2MACE model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
External Validation of the CRAX2MACE model
Waseem Hijazi, William Leslie, Neil Filipchuk, Ryan Choo, Stephen Wilton, Matthew James, Piotr Slomka, Robert Miller
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3380;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
External Validation of the CRAX2MACE model
Waseem Hijazi, William Leslie, Neil Filipchuk, Ryan Choo, Stephen Wilton, Matthew James, Piotr Slomka, Robert Miller
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3380;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Low Prevalence of Non-Response to Vasodilator Stress during Dynamic CZT SPECT MPI
  • Prognostic value of gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT, gated 18F-FDG PET and left ventricular wall thickness by CMR in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac Molecular PET-Imaging of Fibroblast Activation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
Show more Clinical Science

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire