Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Corporate & Special Sales
    • Journal Claims
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation

Performance of a Monolithic Crystal PET Detector with Integrated Retroreflectors

Lemise Saleh and Paul Vaska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3314;
Lemise Saleh
1Stony Brook University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Vaska
1Stony Brook University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3314

Introduction: The standard commercial positron emission tomography (PET) detector uses pixelated scintillation crystals that provide an average spatial resolution of 4-5 mm. The size of the individual scintillation crystals directly affects resolution, motivating research towards miniature crystals (<=3 mm). This approach can be expensive requiring fabrication of many tiny crystals, and results in substantial dead space. Monolithic scintillators are an alternative though they produce wider light distribution. To minimize light spread, black coatings can be applied to all faces except the photosensor coupled side but this reduces overall light collection efficiency and leads to poorer energy, spatial, and time resolutions. We are implementing an array of trihedral corner reflectors as used in retroreflectors, machined directly on the entrance face of a monolithic scintillator, which can efficiently reflect light back to its origin, and readout by a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) array. We compare results to previous monolithic approaches including optical coupling of a separate reflective material to the front face of the scintillator, which can result in distortions and reflections due to multiple interfaces and materials with differing indices of refraction.

Methods: GATE, a Geant4 toolkit for medical imaging, was used to simulate a 20 mm thick LSO scintillator and a 16 x 16 array of SiPMs coupled with grease (n = 1.5). We compared different entrance face surfaces: 1) fully absorptive (black), 2) flat with a polished finish and coupled specular reflector (Flat Specular), 3) 1 mm retroreflective layer coupled with optical grease (Coupled RR), and 4) 1 mm integrated corner reflector (ICR) array with coupled specular reflector (Figure 1). Surface and reflector finishes were simulated using Davis LUT model. All measurements include realistic photon detection efficiency (40%) and electronic readout noise. To analyze spatial resolution, a perpendicular beam of gamma-rays was moved across the central SiPM in 0.5 mm increments. The true source position was compared to the position centroid and the local slope of these curves were used to convert resolution from bins to mm. To analyze DOI, the light spread function (LSF) at the center of the monolith was characterized using the root mean square (RMS) of the 2D light distribution at the readout plane.

Results: For each entrance face finish, the average light distribution of events occurring at the center of the crystal are shown in Figure 2. The black finish only detects photons that are within a detection cone characterized by the critical angle between the LSO (n = 1.8) and optical grease; all other photons reflect off the photosensor and are absorbed by the walls of the crystal. When ICRs are used, significant collection improvements are seen in the central nine photosensors: 94%, 40%, and 26% relative to black, flat specular, and coupled RR, respectively. At the center of the monolith, the ICRs result in an average transverse spatial resolution of 0.85 mm, an improvement of 27% from black, 24% from flat specular, and 15% from the coupled RR finishes (Figure 3 Left). The depth resolutions vary substantially with depth but average to 3.07, 3.26 and 2.78 mm, when using black, flat specular, and coupled RR. In comparison, the ICR detector performs significantly better (average 2.1 mm), and it is more stable across depths (Figure 3 Right).

Conclusions: We show that the use of integrated corner reflectors provides a narrower light distribution, while substantially increasing the total number of detected photons, compared to other monolithic approaches. This results in considerable improvements in transverse spatial and depth resolution. Ongoing work includes optimizing the triggering and positioning schemes, as well as determination of the impact of these different designs on energy and time resolution as a function of position within the crystal, in both simulation and experiment.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
June 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Performance of a Monolithic Crystal PET Detector with Integrated Retroreflectors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Performance of a Monolithic Crystal PET Detector with Integrated Retroreflectors
Lemise Saleh, Paul Vaska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3314;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Performance of a Monolithic Crystal PET Detector with Integrated Retroreflectors
Lemise Saleh, Paul Vaska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3314;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • DIFFERENCES IN THYROID UPTAKE PERCENTAGE BASED ON COUNTING STATISTICS
  • Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers
  • Reducing Lu 177-Vipivotide Tetraxetan (PSMA) Acquisition Time While Maintaining Spatial Resolution
Show more Instrumentation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Powered by HighWire