Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation

Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers

Carlos Nicolas Delgado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine June 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS33;
Carlos Nicolas Delgado
1Saint Louis University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

TS33

Introduction: There is only one certainty about radioactive decay: its unpredictability. Nuclear physicists have invented ways to detect radioactive decay, and these detectors have a variety of components which affect their intrinsic and extrinsic detection efficiency. This begs the question, how do camera manufacturers determine the efficiency of their products? Originating from the Manhattan Project, the Monte Carlo Algorithm is an analytical mathematical tool used by nuclear physicists to study the designs of radiation detectors when a random variable, radioactive decay, determines the research outcome (1-2). The algorithm has been used to simulate the behavior of radioactive isotopes, creating millions of theoretical photon interactions for Nuclear Medicine, SPECT, CT and PET systems (1-2). This algorithm can test specific collimator thicknesses, crystal composition and thicknesses, photomultiplier tube arrays, and operational matrix sizes among many other variables for a range of radionuclide sources in order to determine which instrumentation specifications produce images with high spatial resolution (1-2). Manufacturers such as GE, Siemens, Phillips and Mediso utilize the MCNP code to test detector component variations for multiple radioactive sources (3). The program simulates radioactive decay for multiple isotopes, and this theoretical data is then compared to data obtained from actual radioactive point sources to analyze detector efficiency, spatial resolution, energy resolution, and detection quantum efficiency as they develop new machinery and evaluate cost efficiency; the latest version is the Monte Carlo N-Particle code (MCNP) (1-2-3). The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the accuracy of the MCNP’s ability to simulate radioactive decay behavior, and compare the theoretical data to actual data obtained from experiments with radioactive sources. Studying this relationship will help determine the MCNP’s validity in testing detector efficiency and provide avenues for future research.

Methods: Data was gathered from studies conducted by CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) analysts, manufacturer development, and independent researchers which focus on specific components such as collimators or scintillation crystals to analyze individual component efficiency in relation to total camera efficiency. Studies which compare components from multiple manufacturers will be used to determine MCNP validity in assessing quality control and efficiency of multiple gamma camera systems.

Results: The MCNP code provided data to simulate the necessary interactions to detector efficiency considering collimator, scintillation crystal, and image reconstruction algorithms for multiple sources of radiation across the four discussed manufacturers (5-6-7-8-9). Figures 1 and 2 provide an overview of simulated collimator data and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) v.s. spatial frequency for the defined manufacturers, while figures 3 and 4 provide an example of how Siemens uses the MCNP program to test detector specifications (5-6). The MCNP program operates at a 2% error range when comparing simulated values to experimental results with radioactive sources, indicating it's a valid tool for determining detector efficiency in camera development (7).

Conclusions: MCNP is a valid tool for analyzing detector efficiency and determining which components across manufacturers could create an amalgamated camera for each energy window, standardizing efficiency across all manufacturers. This would hopefully cut manufacturing costs and make nuclear medicine cameras more accessible to other countries. Additionally, a more efficient detection system would reduce scan times, patient doses, and radiation transportation dangers when shipping bulk doses over large distances, hence reducing occupational exposure. As nuclear medicine technology develops, so will its ability to become a safer, more accessible practice on a global scale, and MCNP will have an integral role in this process.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 64, Issue supplement 1
June 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers
Carlos Nicolas Delgado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS33;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers
Carlos Nicolas Delgado
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jun 2023, 64 (supplement 1) TS33;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Investigating the Prospect of Cross Calibrating Bone Density Scanners across a Medical Enterprise
  • DIFFERENCES IN THYROID UPTAKE PERCENTAGE BASED ON COUNTING STATISTICS
Show more Instrumentation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire