Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportInstrumentation

Platform development of easily customizable brain phantoms using 3D-printing workflow

Cynthia Lo, Paul Gravel, Tim Mulnix, Kathryn Fontaine, Sean Martins, Daniel Holden, Richard Carson and Takuya Toyonaga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine August 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3308;
Cynthia Lo
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Gravel
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Mulnix
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Fontaine
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean Martins
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Holden
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Carson
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takuya Toyonaga
1Yale University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3308

Introduction: A next-generation ultra-high performance human brain PET scanner, the NeuroEXPLORER (NX), is targeted to have <2.0mm resolution. Phantoms are key tools for testing and validation of new systems. In brain imaging, simple structured phantoms (such as point/line sources) may be insufficient, and realistic brain phantoms would better reflect scanner capabilities (Gravel, et al. MIC2021). Phantoms need fine features that simulate brain structures such as gyri and sulci. However, commercially available phantoms are expensive and cannot be easily or quickly customized. Also developing new full-scale brain phantom models can be costly with conventional methods. Therefore, we present a new low-cost, scalable, and easy-to-operate workflow for developing custom 3D printed phantoms designed to be filled by a pump system.

Methods: For testing purposes, three prototypes were designed; 1)Micro prototype v0.0, 2)Mini prototype v0.1, 3)Brain prototype v1.0. The Micro phantom is cylindrical (20mm diameter) with two channels per quadrant of different thicknesses (0.5, 1, 2, and 4mm). The Mini phantom is a larger version of the Micro with the same configuration of inlets, outlets, and channels (110mm diameter, Fig.1A). The Brain phantom was designed using the cortical gray matter surface data of BigBrain atlas (Fig.1B) (Wagstyl, et al. PLOS Bio.2020). For this prototype (v1.0), a cropped area of the brain was chosen that includes the finer structures of the occipital lobe (~2.5mm in the average of visual cortex). A continuous flow system allows for quick filling, thorough mixing of the desired solution, increased ease in eliminating bubbles, cleaning, and drying, which is useful for complex structures. To quickly connect and disconnect the phantom, commercially available plastic quick-disconnect tube couplings with plastic pipe fittings are secured into the 3D printed phantom with glue (Fig.1C). The phantoms were printed by sterolithography printers (Form 3L, clear resin). The Micro phantom was printed first to ensure correct part fit and sealing. Next, the Mini phantom was printed, and the inner structure was scanned using the CT of the Siemens mCT. The PET phantom study was conducted on the Mini phantom filled with 18F-FDG solution (98kBq/mL) in the Focus 220 (acquisition:10min, reconstruction:3D MAP-OSEM, voxel:0.95×0.95×0.8mm).

Results: The Micro phantom was estimated to take between 4-12 hours to print with approximate material cost of $4. The Mini phantom requires between 23-40 hours per print with approximate material cost of $75 (print time estimates vary depending on the orientation and chosen layer height). Both the Micro and Mini phantoms were printed successfully and filled within minutes using the continuous flow system (Fig.1C). During the preparation, there were no major issues such as leaking or contamination (Fig.1D). The CT scan from the Siemens mCT resolved all internal structures with channel widths down to 0.5 mm (Fig.1E). The PET images (average of 10 slices, Fig.1F) from the Mini phantom delivered the expected results. Only a few microbubbles were observed by the CT image on the filled Mini phantom.

Conclusions: Phantoms have historically been expensive and limited in their ability to test the full capabilities of imaging technologies. Laser-based 3D printing technologies such as SLA are capable of high-resolution models of complex geometries, with lower costs and time input. The Micro and Mini phantoms were designed for quick in-house engineering validation of 3D printing and scanning workflows. They are structurally similar to older generation phantoms for comparison purposes. We successfully showed imaging consistency between the CAD model, CT scan, and PET scan. Moreover, the entire process from print, to assembly, to scan can be completed within a week for the Mini. This is an extremely flexible, quick, and low-cost workflow for developing and scanning simple phantoms, and more complex geometry of the brain will be developed for our next iteration.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue supplement 2
August 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Platform development of easily customizable brain phantoms using 3D-printing workflow
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Platform development of easily customizable brain phantoms using 3D-printing workflow
Cynthia Lo, Paul Gravel, Tim Mulnix, Kathryn Fontaine, Sean Martins, Daniel Holden, Richard Carson, Takuya Toyonaga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3308;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Platform development of easily customizable brain phantoms using 3D-printing workflow
Cynthia Lo, Paul Gravel, Tim Mulnix, Kathryn Fontaine, Sean Martins, Daniel Holden, Richard Carson, Takuya Toyonaga
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aug 2022, 63 (supplement 2) 3308;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Investigating the Prospect of Cross Calibrating Bone Density Scanners across a Medical Enterprise
  • DIFFERENCES IN THYROID UPTAKE PERCENTAGE BASED ON COUNTING STATISTICS
  • Monte Carlo N-Particle Code Analysis of Multiple Gamma Camera Components from Varying Manufacturers
Show more Instrumentation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire