Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Biokinetics and Dosimetry of 177Lu-Pentixather

Heribert Hänscheid, Andreas Schirbel, Philipp Hartrampf, Sabrina Kraus, Rudolf A. Werner, Hermann Einsele, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Lassmann, Martin Kortüm and Andreas K. Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 754-760; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262295
Heribert Hänscheid
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Schirbel
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp Hartrampf
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabrina Kraus
2Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudolf A. Werner
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hermann Einsele
2Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans-Jürgen Wester
3Department of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, TU Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Lassmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Kortüm
2Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas K. Buck
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Examples of different activity distributions after 177Lu-pentixather in patients 2 and 7 (P2 and P7, respectively), with multiple myeloma, and patient 15 (P15), with pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Although uptake in single kidney of patient 7 was 5%, sum of uptakes in both kidneys of patient 15 was only 1.1%. In contrast, retention was 3-fold higher in bone marrow and 11-fold higher in spleen of patient 15. p.i. = after injection.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Regions of interest used to derive time functions of activity retention in whole body (black), red bone marrow (red), liver (green), right kidney (purple solid circles), left kidney (purple open circles), and spleen (blue) in patient 3 with respective fit functions. Scintigram shows posterior whole-body image 24 h after 197 MBq of 177Lu-pentixather. Gray symbols with fit function represent activity retention per liter of whole blood.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics at Time of Dosimetric Assessment with 177Lu-Pentixather

    Previous treatment
    Patient no.SexAge (y)Weight (kg)Height (cm)eGFRDiseaseSince (mo)CRAutoAllo
    1M616015899MM18x1
    2F6664163100MM54x3
    3F537416554MM123x3
    4M659319246MM101x2
    5M746017354MM22xx2
    6M718017579MM77xx2
    7F666016640MM138xx1
    8F5710415796MM49xx1
    9M597717250MM23xx2
    10M467018392AML7x1
    11M607818282AML19x1
    12F546216867AML27x1
    13F648016385DLBCL42x1
    14F596817220DLBCL32xx1
    15F757516859pre-B ALL15x
    16F507817254TCL21x1
    17F556416096ACC46xx
    18M559017592ACC14xx
    19F4052163n/aThymoma37xx
    • eGFR = Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtrate rate estimate in mL/min per 1.73 m2; C = chemo; R = irradiation; auto = autologous stem cells; allo = allogeneic stem cells; MM = multiple myeloma; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; DLBCL = diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; pre-B ALL = pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia; TCL = T-cell leukemia; ACC = adrenocortical carcinoma; n/a = not available.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    177Lu-Pentixather Time-Integrated Activity Coefficients in Whole Body, Organs, Tumorous Lesions, Red Marrow, and Blood, as Well as Tissue-Absorbed Doses per Administered Activity in Organs and Lesions

    WBKidneysLiverSpleenRed marrowLesionBlood
    Patient no.ã (h)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h/L)
    151.64.391.013.80.392.060.584.00.142.20.21
    256.12.420.7114.40.822.491.558.10.376.90.58
    355.34.852.1015.20.931.270.7214.30.660.48
    497.64.611.4816.20.802.030.7013.70.480.28
    587.71.920.8712.20.913.711.5916.80.591.7
    662.11.740.5011.70.620.630.3411.80.413.1
    7111.06.253.4715.01.171.341.1210.60.48
    861.65.281.2110.00.390.900.389.40.43
    9111.64.761.1213.20.671.180.4713.60.47
    1050.54.510.909.00.432.470.409.90.350.32
    1155.94.341.148.00.421.430.489.10.320.34
    1277.82.030.7913.90.713.460.7521.30.971.1
    13114.97.870.9121.90.672.650.3522.81.042.1
    1483.61.630.5916.70.8811.51.2016.40.75
    15140.91.040.3815.50.7114.02.2651.02.33
    16108.83.221.0714.10.506.511.0312.20.561.60.28
    1773.61.930.5220.10.922.380.565.50.252.30.28
    1851.63.470.6712.00.413.300.424.00.141.10.32
    1948.05.231.969.40.810.440.488.50.390.70.44
    P0.030.31<0.010.950.21<0.01 < 0.01<0.01<0.01 < 0.010.23
    Minimum48.01.040.383.70.390.440.344.00.140.70.21
    First quartile55.61.980.7010.90.471.300.458.80.361.20.28
    Median73.64.340.9113.90.712.380.5811.80.471.90.32
    Third quartile103.24.801.1815.40.853.381.0815.40.622.30.42
    Maximum140.97.873.4721.91.1714.02.2651.02.336.90.58
    Mean79.03.771.1313.30.693.360.8113.80.592.30.35
    SD27.91.820.734.20.223.610.5210.40.491.80.11
    • WB = whole body; ã = time-integrated activity coefficient; D/A = tissue-absorbed doses per administered activity.

    • P values are from Shapiro–Wilk test of normality.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    90Y-Pentixather Time-Integrated Activity Coefficients in Whole Body, Organs, Tumorous Lesions, Red Marrow, and Blood, as Well as Tissue-Absorbed Doses per Administered Activity in Organs and Lesions (Recalculated from Kinetics Measured with 177Lu-Pentixather)

    WBKidneysLiverSpleenRed marrowLesionBlood
    Patient no.ã (h)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h)D/A (Gy/GBq)D/A (Gy/GBq)ã (h/L)
    131.53.033.911.91.181.051.662.30.346.10.19
    233.61.903.165.81.910.953.304.00.7718.20.48
    335.12.957.326.02.120.531.707.41.420.42
    451.62.975.366.31.800.821.586.00.880.28
    550.81.223.106.12.651.263.048.41.234.1
    640.11.312.125.21.610.401.207.41.099.2
    754.23.8712.26.62.970.693.226.51.25
    834.53.744.855.41.220.451.075.10.98
    958.53.224.296.11.770.671.517.21.06
    1032.83.323.754.61.291.070.974.90.720.28
    1135.72.834.213.81.160.761.424.70.690.30
    1247.21.413.165.41.612.062.5110.11.943.4
    1359.34.893.218.51.511.421.058.91.724.7
    1449.61.042.157.62.326.633.859.61.85
    1567.70.711.486.01.577.406.6923.24.45
    1663.82.384.507.81.593.042.707.11.364.20.26
    1741.11.392.158.72.311.411.883.10.595.40.44
    1834.52.472.675.71.141.581.131.80.273.60.28
    1929.93.537.523.61.800.251.533.50.681.50.40
    P0.080.53<0.010.550.13<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.31
    Minimum29.90.711.482.01.140.250.971.830.271.50.19
    First quartile34.51.402.885.31.400.681.314.350.713.70.28
    Median41.12.833.756.01.611.051.666.501.064.50.29
    Third quartile52.93.274.676.42.021.502.877.881.395.90.41
    Maximum67.74.8912.28.72.977.406.6923.24.4518.20.48
    Mean44.82.544.275.91.771.712.216.901.226.00.33
    SD12.01.142.521.70.511.991.394.610.914.70.10
    • WB = whole body; ã = time-integrated activity coefficient; D/A = tissue-absorbed doses per administered activity.

    • P values are from Shapiro–Wilk test of normality.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (5)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 5
May 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Biokinetics and Dosimetry of 177Lu-Pentixather
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Biokinetics and Dosimetry of 177Lu-Pentixather
Heribert Hänscheid, Andreas Schirbel, Philipp Hartrampf, Sabrina Kraus, Rudolf A. Werner, Hermann Einsele, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Lassmann, Martin Kortüm, Andreas K. Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 754-760; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262295

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Biokinetics and Dosimetry of 177Lu-Pentixather
Heribert Hänscheid, Andreas Schirbel, Philipp Hartrampf, Sabrina Kraus, Rudolf A. Werner, Hermann Einsele, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Michael Lassmann, Martin Kortüm, Andreas K. Buck
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2022, 63 (5) 754-760; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262295
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Rethinking Dosimetry: A European Perspective
  • Limitations of the radiotheranostic concept in neuroendocrine tumors due to lineage-dependent somatostatin receptor expression on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
  • CXCR4-Directed Imaging and Endoradiotherapy in Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors
  • Theranostics in Hematooncology
  • Detecting CXCR4 Expression in Meningioma on 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MRI
  • C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4-Targeted Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Advanced T-Cell Lymphoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Meeting Upcoming Clinical and Diagnostic Needs in Oncologic Imaging: A Structured Reporting System for Fibroblast-Activation-Protein–Targeted Imaging—FAP-RADS Version 1.0
  • Imaging Efficacy of [18F]CTT1057 PET for the Detection of PSMA-Positive Tumors Using Histopathology as Standard of Truth: Results from the GuideView Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Cost-Effectiveness of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis Based on Results of the NETTER-2 Trials
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • pentixather
  • biokinetics
  • dosimetry
  • CXCR4
  • endoradiotherapy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire