Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical (Molecular Imaging: Peptides)

Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based Probe for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer

Olga Bragina, Vladimir Chernov, Alexey Schulga, Elena Konovalova, Eugeniy Garbukov, Anzhelika Vorobyeva, Anna Orlova, Liubov Tashireva, Jens Sörensen, Roman Zelchan, Anna Medvedeva, Sergey Deyev and Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine April 2022, 63 (4) 528-535; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262542
Olga Bragina
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia;
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Chernov
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia;
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexey Schulga
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
3Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Konovalova
3Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eugeniy Garbukov
4Department of General Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anzhelika Vorobyeva
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
5Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Orlova
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
6Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liubov Tashireva
7Department of General and Molecular Pathology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Tomsk, Russia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jens Sörensen
8Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roman Zelchan
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia;
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Medvedeva
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergey Deyev
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
3Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Tolmachev
2Research Centrum for Oncotheranostics, Research School of Chemistry and Applied Biomedical Sciences, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia;
5Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) flow diagram.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Kinetics of elimination of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 from blood. Data were calculated on the basis of count rates in ROIs placed over hearts.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Anterior planar images at 2, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection of 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 (patient 24). Upper setting of scale window is 12% of maximum counts. Arrows point at lesions.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Representative anterior planar images of patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative tumors 4 h after injections of 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3. Upper setting of scale window is same for all images, 12% of maximum count rate. Arrows point at lesions.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Primary tumor–to–contralateral site ratios after injections of 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3. *Marks significant (P < 0.05) difference. **Marks highly significant (P < 0.01) difference. ns = not significant.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Patient 26. (A) Immunohistochemistry analysis shows very low HER2 expression in biopsy material. (B) Anterior planar image at 4 h after injection; upper setting of scale window is 12% of maximum counts, showing tumor–to–contralateral site ratio typical for HER2-positive tumors. Immunohistochemistry analysis of surgery material shows areas with high (B) and low (C) HER2 expression. Magnification 400×. Black arrows show cells with low and red arrows show cells with high HER2 expression. Arrows point at tumor.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Patient 27. SPECT/CT (A) and CT (B) images of hepatic lesions. SPECT/CT (C) and CT (D) images of iliac bone lesions. Arrows point at lesions.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics

    PatientAge (y)HER2 status in primary tumor before imaging (IHC/FISH)HER2 gene amplification (determined after imaging)Primary tumor status (ER/PgR)Clinical stage before imaging
    1,000 μg; mean tumor size, 28 ± 11 mm
     1681+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     2621+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+I (T1N0M0)
     3661+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     4480 (IHC)FISH-ER-/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     5503+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     6703+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     7303+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIB (T2N1M0)
     8592+ (IHC)/FISH+ER-/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     945(IHC)3+FISH-ER+/PgR-IIB (T2N1M0)
    2,000 μg; mean tumor size, 25 ± 6 mm
     10501+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     11571+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+I (T1N0M0)
     12431+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     13511+ (IHC)FISH-ER-/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     14653+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     15353+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+I (T1N0M0)
     16501+ (IHC)*FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     17682+ (IHC)/FISH+ER+/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     18683+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
    3,000 μg; mean tumor size 22 ± 7 mm
     19371+ (IHC)FISH-ER-/PgR-IIA (T2N0M0)
     20451+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     21561+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     22451+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     23361+ (IHC)FISH-ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     24483+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIВ (T2N1M0)
     25583+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     26471+ (IHC)*FISH+ER+/PgR+IIA (T2N0M0)
     27613+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR-IV (T4N3M1)
     28493+ (IHC)FISH+ER+/PgR+I (T1N0M0)
    • * Postimaging FISH evaluation demonstrated HER2 gene amplification.

    • IHC = immunohistochemistry; ER = estrogen receptor; PgR = progesterone receptor;+ = positive; - = negative.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Uptake of 99mTc in Tumor-Free Areas of Organs with Highest Uptake on SPECT Images After Injection of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 (Decay Corrected)

    2 h4 h6 h24 h
    Organ1,000 μg2,000 μg3,000 μg1,000 μg2,000 μg3,000 μg1,000 μg2,000 μg3,000 μg1,000 μg2,000 μg3,000 μg
    Breast2.1 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.52.1 ± 0.52.3 ± 1.11.8 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.4
    Small intestines2.5 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.81.9 ± 0.52.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.6
    Kidney24 ± 528 ± 629 ± 1122 ± 528 ± 629 ± 1124 ± 528 ± 629 ± 1121 ± 521 ± 526 ± 12
    Liver11 ± 26 ± 2*5 ± 2*12 ± 46 ± 2*5 ± 2*10 ± 36 ± 2*4 ± 1*9 ± 35 ± 2*4 ± 2*
    Lungs2.4 ± 0.62.4 ± 0.72.7 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.52.2 ± 0.72.2 ± 0.61.9 ± 0.62.0 ± 0.62.0 ± 0.41.9 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.4
    • * Significant difference in uptake compared with injection of 1,000 μg 99mTc-(HE)3-G3.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Absorbed Doses after Injection of 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3

    Absorbed dose, mGy/MBq
    Site1,000 μg2,000 μg3,000 μg
    Adrenals0.031 ± 0.0070.031 ± 0.0070.032 ± 0.002
    Brain0.0010 ± 0.00040.0011 ± 0.00020.0012 ± 0.0001
    Breasts0.008 ± 0.0020.007 ± 0.0010.008 ± 0.001
    Gallbladder wall0.017 ± 0.0030.015 ± 0.0040.014 ± 0.002
    LLI wall0.005 ± 0.0010.006 ± 0.0030.006 ± 0.001
    Small intestine0.0076 ± 0.00100.009 ± 0.0040.009 ± 0.002
    Stomach wall0.0060 ± 0.00080.006 ± 0.0010.007 ± 0.002
    ULI wall0.007 ± 0.0010.008 ± 0.0030.009 ± 0.002
    Heart wall0.004 ± 0.0010.004 ± 0.0010.0042 ± 0.0007
    Kidneys0.10 ± 0.020.10 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.05
    Liver0.016 ± 0.0030.011 ± 0.003*0.0100 ± 0.0008*
    Lungs0.005 ± 0.0010.005 ± 0.0010.006 ± 0.001
    Muscle0.0024 ± 0.00050.003 ± 0.0010.0028 ± 0.0007
    Ovaries0.014 ± 0.0050.014 ± 0.0080.013 ± 0.003
    Pancreas0.012 ± 0.0010.013 ± 0.0030.016 ± 0.004
    Red marrow0.0033 ± 0.00070.004 ± 0.0010.004 ± 0.001
    Osteogenic cells0.006 ± 0.0020.006 ± 0.0020.007 ± 0.001
    Skin0.0014 ± 0.00040.0015 ± 0.00030.0017 ± 0.0003
    Spleen0.010 ± 0.0010.010 ± 0.0030.012 ± 0.004
    Thymus0.006 ± 0.0010.007 ± 0.0030.0068 ± 0.0002
    Thyroid0.017 ± 0.0030.018 ± 0.0050.022 ± 0.003
    Urinary bladder wall0.013 ± 0.0070.014 ± 0.0090.019 ± 0.007
    Uterus0.008 ± 0.0020.055 ± 0.010.009 ± 0.003
    Total body0.004 ± 0.0010.004 ± 0.0010.004 ± 0.001
    Effective dose equivalent (mSv/MBq)0.017 ± 0.0020.020 ± 0.0120.019 ± 0.005
    Effective dose (mSv/MBq)0.011 ± 0.0010.012 ± 0.0060.012 ± 0.003
    • * Significant (P < 0.05) difference with absorbed dose after the injection of 1,000 μg 99mTc-(HE)3-G3.

    • LLI = lower large intestine; ULI = upper large intestine.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 4
April 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based Probe for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based Probe for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer
Olga Bragina, Vladimir Chernov, Alexey Schulga, Elena Konovalova, Eugeniy Garbukov, Anzhelika Vorobyeva, Anna Orlova, Liubov Tashireva, Jens Sörensen, Roman Zelchan, Anna Medvedeva, Sergey Deyev, Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 528-535; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262542

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based Probe for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer
Olga Bragina, Vladimir Chernov, Alexey Schulga, Elena Konovalova, Eugeniy Garbukov, Anzhelika Vorobyeva, Anna Orlova, Liubov Tashireva, Jens Sörensen, Roman Zelchan, Anna Medvedeva, Sergey Deyev, Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Apr 2022, 63 (4) 528-535; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262542
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Decade of Clinical Experience with DARPins in Oncology and Virology: A Systematic Review
  • Designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein-Mediated Peptide Nucleic Acid-Based Pretargeting: A Proof-of-Principle Study
  • Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins for detecting prostate-specific antigen expression in vivo
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • HER2
  • DARPin G3
  • 99mTc
  • SPECT
  • phase I
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire