Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communication

Dual-Tracer PET/CT Protocol with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 for Cancer Imaging: A Proof of Concept

Katrin S. Roth, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Lutz van Heek, Simone Wegen, Klaus Schomäcker, Thomas Fischer, Simone Marnitz, Alexander Drzezga and Carsten Kobe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine November 2022, 63 (11) 1683-1686; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263835
Katrin S. Roth
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lutz van Heek
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Wegen
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife, and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Schomäcker
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Fischer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Marnitz
2Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife, and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Drzezga
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carsten Kobe
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) Axial single-tracer [18F]-FDG PET/CT scan showing primary tumor at gastroesophageal junction and metastases in left adrenal gland and liver. (B) Maximum-intensity projection of single-tracer PET images displaying high uptake in brain tissue, tracer accumulation around injection site at right elbow, lymph node (LN) metastasis in left upper mediastinum, multiple abdominal LN metastases, and liver metastases. Additional benign accumulation of [18F]-FDG is visible, caused by right-sided thoracolumbar osteoarthritis. (C) Transverse section of dual-tracer [18F]-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT scan of same patient as in A and B with mediastinal LN metastasis. (D) As all images were visually normalized to uptake in liver, maximum-intensity projection of dual-tracer PET/CT in same patient shows less pronounced tracer accumulation in brain tissue than does single-tracer PET/CT. In addition to lesions detected with single-tracer PET/CT, further abdominal LN metastasis and liver metastases are visualized via [18F]-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Focal tracer accumulation in right vein angle is due to intravenous tracer accumulation from former tracer depot at right elbow.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Box plot of TBRs calculated from peak and maximum CR of tumors (CRpeakT and CRmaxT, respectively) (A) and peak and maximum CR of metastasis (CRpeakM and CRmaxM, respectively) (B) vs. mean CR of background cerebellum (CRmeanC), liver (CRmeanL), and mediastinal blood pool (CRmeanBP). Plots clearly display tendency of median TBRs to be higher on dual-tracer [18F]-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT than on single-tracer [18F]-FDG PET/CT. These results were most obvious in TBRs of malignant tissue with cerebellum or liver as background.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Characteristics, Scan Data, and Lesion Detection with Single- vs. Dual-Tracer PET/CT

    CharacteristicMeanNo. of patients
    Single tracerDual tracer
    Age (y)72.5 ± 12.3
    Detected malignant findings on PET/CT
     Tumors (n = 7)
     Oropharyngeal cancer22
     Cancer of mouth floor11
     Esophageal cancer44
     Metastasis (n = 12)
     Lymph node metastasis
      Cervical44
      Mediastinal12*
      Mesenterial11
      Retroperitoneal11
      Parailiac11
     Pleural metastasis11
     Liver metastasis11*
     Adrenal gland metastasis11
    PET/CT
     Time between [68Ga]Ga-  FAPI-46 injection and  scan (min)18.2 ± 20.1
     Time between  [18F]-FDG and  [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46  scan (min)81.3 ± 38.1
    • * More metastases were detected in drainage area of mediastinal lymph nodes and liver on dual-tracer PET/CT than on single-tracer PET/CT.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    TBRs of CRs Measured in Tumors, Metastasis, and Background on [18F]-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT

    TBRDual tracerSingle tracerWilcoxon signed-rank test
    CR tumor-to-background
     CR peak tumor/CR mean cerebellum3.7 ± 1.71.8 ± 1.0z = −2.37, P = 0.008; r = 0.89
     CR peak tumor/CR mean liver8.0 ± 4.14.7 ± 2.3z = −2.20, P = 0.016; r = 0.83
     CR peak tumor/CR mean mediastinal blood pool8.2 ± 3.76.1 ± 2.8z = −2.20, P = 0.016; r = 0.83
     CR maximum tumor/CR mean cerebellum4.3 ± 1.82.1 ±1.1z = −2.37, P = 0.008; r = 0.89
     CR maximum tumor/CR mean liver9.3 ± 4.25.7 ± 2.6z = −2.20, P = 0.016; r = 0.83
     CR maximum tumor/CR mean mediastinal blood pool9.5 ± 3.77.3 ± 3.2z = −2.03, P = 0.023; r = 0.76
    CR metastasis-to-background
     CR peak metastasis/CR mean cerebellum2.2 ± 1.20.8 ± 0.5z = −3.06, P ≤ 0.001; r = 0.88
     CR peak metastasis/CR mean liver2.9 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.0z = −3.06, P ≤ 0.001; r = 0.88
     CR peak metastasis/CR mean mediastinal blood pool3.9 ± 1.93.1 ± 1.8z = −2.51, P = 0.005; r = 0.72
     CR maximum metastasis/CR mean cerebellum2.9 ± 1.61.1 ± 0.6z = −3.06, P ≤ 0.001; r = 0.88
     CR maximum metastasis/CR mean liver3.9 ± 1.42.5 ± 1.2z = −2.82, P ≤ 0.001; r = 0.81
     CR maximum metastasis/CR mean mediastinal blood pool5.2 ± 2.44.0 ± 2.2z = −2.35, P = 0.008; r = 0.68
    • Data are mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (11)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 11
November 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual-Tracer PET/CT Protocol with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 for Cancer Imaging: A Proof of Concept
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dual-Tracer PET/CT Protocol with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 for Cancer Imaging: A Proof of Concept
Katrin S. Roth, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Lutz van Heek, Simone Wegen, Klaus Schomäcker, Thomas Fischer, Simone Marnitz, Alexander Drzezga, Carsten Kobe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2022, 63 (11) 1683-1686; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263835

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dual-Tracer PET/CT Protocol with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 for Cancer Imaging: A Proof of Concept
Katrin S. Roth, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Lutz van Heek, Simone Wegen, Klaus Schomäcker, Thomas Fischer, Simone Marnitz, Alexander Drzezga, Carsten Kobe
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2022, 63 (11) 1683-1686; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263835
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Measuring Total Metabolic Tumor Volume from 18F-FDG PET: A Reality Check
  • Bioanalytic Hybrid System Merging 3-Dimensional Cell Culture and Chromatographic Precision for Unprecedented Preclinical Insights in Molecular Imaging
  • Radiances of Cerenkov-Emitting Radionuclides on the In Vivo Imaging System
Show more BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • dual-tracer PET/CT
  • FDG
  • FAPI
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire