Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleClinical Investigation

Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study

Heather Jacene, Mofei Liu, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, Shipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van den Abbeele and Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2022, 63 (1) 22-28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262068
Heather Jacene
1Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
2Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mofei Liu
3Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su-Chun Cheng
3Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Abbott
1Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shipra Dubey
2Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keisha McCall
1Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diane Young
4GTx, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mayzie Johnston
4GTx, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annick D. Van den Abbeele
1Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Overmoyer
5Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Most breast cancers express androgen receptors (ARs). This prospective imaging substudy explored imaging of ARs with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) PET in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving selective AR modulation (SARM) therapy (GTx-024). Methods: Eleven postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive MBC underwent 18F-FDHT PET/CT at baseline and at 6 and 12 wk after starting SARM therapy. Abnormal tumor 18F-FDHT uptake was quantified using SUVmax. AR status was determined from tumor biopsy specimens. 18F-FDHT SUVmax percentage change between scans was calculated. Best overall response was categorized as clinical benefit (nonprogressive disease) or progressive disease using RECIST 1.1. Results: The median baseline 18F-FDHT SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 1.4–5.9) for AR-positive tumors versus 2.3 (range, 1.5–3.2) for AR-negative tumors (P = 0.22). Quantitative AR expression and baseline 18F-FDHT uptake were weakly correlated (Pearson ρ = 0.39, P = 0.30). Seven participants with clinical benefit at 12 wk tended to have larger declines in 18F-FDHT uptake than did those with progressive disease both at 6 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, −26.8% [range, −42.9% to −14.1%], vs. –3.7% [range,−31% to +29%], respectively; P = 0.11) and at 12 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, −35.7% [range, −69.5% to −7.7%], vs. –20.1% [range, −26.6% to +56.5%], respectively; P = 0.17). Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating data suggest that 18F-FDHT PET/CT is worth further study as an imaging biomarker for evaluating the response of MBC to SARM therapy and reiterate the feasibility of including molecular imaging in multidisciplinary therapeutic trials.

  • 18F-FDHT
  • androgen receptor
  • AR
  • PET
  • breast cancer

Footnotes

  • Published online May 28, 2021.

  • © 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 63 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 63, Issue 1
January 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study
Heather Jacene, Mofei Liu, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, Shipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van den Abbeele, Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2022, 63 (1) 22-28; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262068

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study
Heather Jacene, Mofei Liu, Su-Chun Cheng, Amanda Abbott, Shipra Dubey, Keisha McCall, Diane Young, Mayzie Johnston, Annick D. Van den Abbeele, Beth Overmoyer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2022, 63 (1) 22-28; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262068
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Report on the PET/CT Image-Based Radiation Dosimetry of [18F]FDHT in Women, a Validated Imaging Agent with New Applications for Evaluation of Androgen Receptor Status in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Report on the PET/CT Image-Based Radiation Dosimetry of [18F]FDHT in Women, a Validated Imaging Agent with New Applications for Evaluation of Androgen Receptor Status in Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • [18F]FDG PET/CT Predicts Patient Survival in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
  • Whole-Body [18F]DPA-714 Kinetic Assessment Using PET/CT Scanner with Long Axial Field of View
  • Clinical Outcomes of 177Lu-DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Neuroendocrine Tumors: Insights from Real-World Experience
Show more Clinical Investigation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-FDHT
  • androgen receptor
  • AR
  • PET
  • breast cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire