Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportOral - PhysicianPharm

Dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT and Compartmental Modelling to Non-invasively Estimate the Glomerular Filtration Rate

David Kersting, Miriam Sraieb, Robert Seifert, Pedro Fragoso Costa, Lale Umutlu, Michael Nader, Wolfgang Fendler, Walter Jentzen, Ken Herrmann and Christoph Rischpler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 88;
David Kersting
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miriam Sraieb
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Seifert
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Fragoso Costa
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lale Umutlu
2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Nader
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Fendler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Walter Jentzen
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Herrmann
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Rischpler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

88

Introduction: The determination of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is decisive for a variety of clinical issues such as ensuring an adequate renal function prior to radioligand therapy. Renal scintigraphy using radiotracers that are almost exclusively extracted by glomerular filtration instead of active tubular secretion allow the assessment of urine efflux as well as the determination of the GFR. However, repeated blood sampling over a period of several hours is required for an accurate GFR estimation. In contrast, dynamic renal PET imaging using glomerular filtrated PET tracers like 68Ga-labelled 1,4,7,10-Tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (68GA-DOTA) bears the potential to estimate the GFR without venous blood sampling by compartmental kinetic modelling. We here present the to our knowledge first investigation of the feasibility of a GFR estimation by single-compartmental-modelling using dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT data. The aim of the study was to correlate the PET-derived GFRPET with the clinically established serum creatinine-derived GFRcrea and to compare the visual assessment of urinary obstruction with renal scintigraphy results.

Methods: Data sets of 10 patients who underwent dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET imaging prior to 177Lu-DOTATOC or 177Lu-PSMA therapy were included. The mean applied activity was 112.2 MBq of 68Ga-DOTA. Dynamic list mode PET data were acquired for 30 min starting at the time point of injection using a Siemens Biograph Vision PET/CT system; the data were resampled and reconstructed in 12 frames of 30s and 18 frames of 90s. A single compartmental-model (Fig. 1) was used to estimate the influx rate constant K1 and the tissue blood volume fraction vB from the tracer kinetic in the functional renal cortical volume VRC. VRC was manually segmented in the dynamic PET images. GFRPET was calculated as the product of K1, VRC, and the vascular volume fraction (1-vB). The arterial input function was determined from the PET signal in the abdominal aorta. GFRcrea was calculated using the established CKD-EPI-formula. The Pearson correlation coefficient was determined to describe the association between GFRPET and GFRcrea in a linear regression model; the confidence interval (CI) was estimated by bootstrapping with 1000 replicates. Time-activity-curves were visually assessed for urinary obstruction and compared with previously determined renal scintigraphy results.

Results: In 8/10 patients with undisturbed urinary efflux in the visual analysis of the time-activity-curves (Fig. 3), the reproducibility analysis revealed a good agreement and a linear correlation between GFRPET and GFRcrea with a Pearson coefficient of R2 = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.7685 - 0.9987, Fig. 4). In 2/10 patients with urinary obstruction, the determination of GFRPET led to a significant underestimation indicated by a GFRPET/GFRcrea fraction of 0.32 and 0.29, respectively. These were the same 2/10 patients who were diagnosed with urinary obstruction in previous renal scintigraphy examinations.

Conclusions: The preliminary data suggest that a non-invasive accurate GFR estimation by single-compartmental-modelling of dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET data is feasible in patients without urinary obstruction. Further investigation, such as a validation against a clinical gold standard, is warranted. The visual assessment of urine outflow revealed comparable results with routine renal scintigraphy.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT and Compartmental Modelling to Non-invasively Estimate the Glomerular Filtration Rate
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT and Compartmental Modelling to Non-invasively Estimate the Glomerular Filtration Rate
David Kersting, Miriam Sraieb, Robert Seifert, Pedro Fragoso Costa, Lale Umutlu, Michael Nader, Wolfgang Fendler, Walter Jentzen, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Rischpler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 88;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dynamic 68Ga-DOTA PET/CT and Compartmental Modelling to Non-invasively Estimate the Glomerular Filtration Rate
David Kersting, Miriam Sraieb, Robert Seifert, Pedro Fragoso Costa, Lale Umutlu, Michael Nader, Wolfgang Fendler, Walter Jentzen, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Rischpler
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 88;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Oral - PhysicianPharm

  • Explainable prediction of all-cause mortality from myocardial PET flow and perfusion images using deep learning
  • 89Zr Labeled Anti-PD-1 Antibody PET Monitors phorbol-12-Myristate-13-Acetate (PMA) induced Modulation of Lymphoma PD-1 Expression.
  • Unsupervised background removal by dual-modality PET/CT guidance: application to PSMA imaging of metastases
Show more Oral - PhysicianPharm

Spotlight on Endocrinology and Pediatrics

  • Imaging Chemotherapy-Induced Brain Damage in Pediatric Cancer Survivors
  • 68Gallium DOTATATE and Neuroblastoma Restaging and Response to Therapy Evaluation
  • Accuracy of 18F-fluorocholine PET for the detection of parathyroid adenomas: prospective single center study
Show more Spotlight on Endocrinology and Pediatrics

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire