Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportPoster - PhysicianPharm

Evaluation of the biodistribution of 18F-siPSMA-14 in the HET-CAM model

Jessica Loeffler, Andrea Koch, Carmen Hamp, Christoph Solbach, Hao Li, Gerhard Glatting, Volker Rasche, Ambros Beer and Gordon Winter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1245;
Jessica Loeffler
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Koch
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen Hamp
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Solbach
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hao Li
2Center for Translational Imaging, Internal Medicine II Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerhard Glatting
3Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Rasche
2Center for Translational Imaging, Internal Medicine II Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ambros Beer
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon Winter
1Department of Nuclear Medicine Ulm University Medical Center Ulm Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

1245

Introduction: The evaluation of newly developed radiopharmaceuticals always requires animal experiments. The HET-CAM (hen’s egg test- chorioallantoic membrane) model is a promising alternative to reduce the number of necessary animal experiments by preceding studies in chicken eggs in accordance with the 3Rs principles. Our aim was to validate the model, particularly in terms of quantifiability and reproducibility of data using the PSMA-specific tracer 18F-siPSMA-14.

Methods: Tumor xenografts of a PSMA-positive (LNCaP C4-2) and a PSMA-negative cell line (PC-3) were established on the CAM. MRI and PET measurements were performed between embryo development days 12 and 16. The MRI (BioSpec 117/16, Bruker) included an overview scan (Flash3D) of the whole egg and a high-resolution scan (RARE) of the tumor region. After i.v. application of 18F-siPSMA-14 a dynamic PET (Focus 120, Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc.) was performed for 60 min. PET data were evaluated using 3DSlicer [1] and Pmod ver. 4.105 (PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland). Subsequently, tumor xenografts were excised and the corresponding radioactivity was determined using a γ-counter (Cobra II, PerkinElmer). To detect the PSMA protein, tumors were lysed and Western blots (WB) were generated.

Results: In the WB analysis PSMA was detected only in the LNCaP C4-2 cells. Tumor volumes were determined based on MRI data LNCaP C4-2 (35.4 ± 7.8) mm³ / PC-3 (29.6 ± 9.7) mm³ (n=4). A high accumulated activity could be detected in the LNCaP C4-2 tumor xenografts after superposition of PET and MRI data: LNCaP C4-2 (1.1 ± 1.3) %IA/ml; PC-3 (0.7 ± 1.1) %IA/ml, resulting in a ratio of C4-2/PC-3 = 1.8 ± 1.4. By γ-counter measurements similar results were obtained: LNCaP C4-2 (8.7 ± 1.5) %IA/ml; PC-3 (5.5 ± 1.6) %IA/ml; C4-2/PC-3 = 1.6 ± 0.3.

Conclusions: In both, PET and y-counter the specific accumulation of 18F-siPSMA-14 in PSMA-positive tumors was successfully demonstrated using the HET-CAM model. This platform allows the exact determination of tumor volume and quantification of peptide accumulation. Thus, the HET-CAM model has great potential to assess radiopharmaceutical accumulation and can contribute to reduce the number of animal experiments. References: [1] Fedorov A., Beichel R., Kalpathy-Cramer J., Finet J., Fillion-Robin J-C., Pujol S., Bauer C., Jennings D., Fennessy F., Sonka M., Buatti J., Aylward S.R., Miller J.V., Pieper S., Kikinis R. 3D Slicer as an Image Computing Platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of the biodistribution of 18F-siPSMA-14 in the HET-CAM model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of the biodistribution of 18F-siPSMA-14 in the HET-CAM model
Jessica Loeffler, Andrea Koch, Carmen Hamp, Christoph Solbach, Hao Li, Gerhard Glatting, Volker Rasche, Ambros Beer, Gordon Winter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1245;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of the biodistribution of 18F-siPSMA-14 in the HET-CAM model
Jessica Loeffler, Andrea Koch, Carmen Hamp, Christoph Solbach, Hao Li, Gerhard Glatting, Volker Rasche, Ambros Beer, Gordon Winter
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2021, 62 (supplement 1) 1245;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Poster - PhysicianPharm

  • Preliminary result of Texture Analysis on prediction of overall outcome of neuroendocrine tumors based on pre-therapy heterogeneity of somatostatin receptors on 68Ga Dotatate PET/CT scans.
  • A clinical study of baseline PET/CT parameters in the prediction of refractory/ relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma of advanced stage patients
  • A head-to-head comparison of the Lugano Classification and PERCIST for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Show more Poster - PhysicianPharm

Oncology (Science), Basic and Translation

  • Development of a Highly Biocompatible Prussian Blue Nanoparticles Deposited Bacterial Nanocellulose for Photothermal Therapy
  • Therapeutic activation of TiO2-Tf-TC nanoparticles by 89Zr-daratumumab in a multiple myeloma tumor model
  • Progesterone receptor mediated regulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in breast cancer
Show more Oncology (Science), Basic and Translation

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire