Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Research ArticleTheranostics

64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection

Mathias Loft, Esben A. Carlsen, Camilla B. Johnbeck, Helle H. Johannesen, Tina Binderup, Andreas Pfeifer, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne K. Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Ulrich Knigge and Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine January 2021, 62 (1) 73-80; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.244509
Mathias Loft
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Esben A. Carlsen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camilla B. Johnbeck
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helle H. Johannesen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Binderup
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Pfeifer
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jann Mortensen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Oturai
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Loft
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne K. Berthelsen
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seppo W. Langer
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
3Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Knigge
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Departments of Clinical Endocrinology and Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Kjaer
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2ENETS Neuroendocrine Tumor Center of Excellence, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Representative examples of liver lesions (A), bone lesions (B), lymph node lesions (C), and pancreatic lesions (D) in same patients scanned at 1 and 3 h after injection. From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT, and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. All lesions were identified at both 1 h and 3 h on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET (arrows). Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    True-positive finding in patient 1: one additional lymph node lesion (arrows) visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection but not at 1 h, with visible CT correlate. Lesion was also visible on PET and CT at 1 h after injection on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT performed 9 mo later. From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT, and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    True-positive finding in patient 4: one additional bone lesion (arrows) visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection but not at 1 h, with visible CT correlate. No later SSTR PET images were available. From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT, and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    True-positive finding in patient 3: one additional liver lesion (arrows) visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection but not at 1 h, without CT correlate. This discordant lesion was also visible on PET and CT at 1 h after injection on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET performed 46 mo later. From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET (68Ga-DOTATOC PET), 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT (68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT), and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    True-positive finding in patient 5: one additional liver lesion (arrows) visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection but not at 1 h, with no visible CT correlate. This discordant lesion was also visible on PET without CT correlate at 1 h after injection on 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT performed 39 mo later. From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET (68Ga-DOTATOC PET), 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT(68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT), and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    False-positive finding in patient 2: one additional bone lesion (arrow) visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 1 h after injection but not at 3 h, without CT correlate. No later SSTR PET images were available. No visible CT correlate was seen on latest CT scan, 8 mo later (not shown). From left to right are shown CT, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET, 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT, and maximum-intensity projection, with corresponding SUV color bars below. Ant = anterior; F = feet; H = head; p.i. = after injection; post = posterior.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Characteristics

    CharacteristicData
    Sex
     Male21 (60%)
     Female14 (40%)
    Age (y)
     Mean62
     Range40–81
    Site of primary tumor
     Lung3 (9%)
     Gastrointestinal13 (37%)
     Pancreatic5 (14%)
     Other2 (6%)
     Unknown12 (34%)
    Functional status
     Nonfunctioning20 (57%)
     Functioning (carcinoid syndrome)15 (43%)
    Grade
     Low (G1)8 (23%)
     Intermediate (G2)21 (60%)
     High (G3)2 (6%)
     KI-67 proliferation index not available4 (11%)
    Primary tumor removed
     No20 (57%)
     Yes15 (43%)
    Previous treatments*
     Surgery15 (43%)
     Interferon α19 (54%)
     Somatostatin analogs14 (40%)
     Radiofrequency ablation (liver metastases)3 (9%)
     External radiation therapy1 (3%)
     Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy12 (34%)
    • ↵* Some patients received multiple treatments. Therefore, total number of treatments exceeded number of patients.

    • Data are n followed by percentage in parentheses, except for age.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Lesions per Organ or Region

    Visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET
    Organ or tissueConcordantOnly at 1 h after injectionOnly at 3 h after injectionP†
    Lung1400—
    Liver298020.98
    Intestines1800—
    Pancreas1200—
    Intraabdominal carcinomatosis700—
    Bone326111.00
    Lymph nodes114010.98
    Other*3300—
    Total822140.99
    • ↵* 22 soft-tissue lesions, 5 heart lesions, 1 prostate lesion, 1 adrenal lesion, 1 stomach lesion, 1 thyroid lesion, 1 brain lesion, and 1 spleen lesion.

    • ↵† Testing for differences in number of lesions with negative binominal regression on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET between 1 and 3 h after injection. The analyses are performed per organ or region and on the total number of lesions.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Discordant Lesions per Patient

    Visible on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET
    Patient no.ConcordantOnly at 1 h after injectionOnly at 3 h after injectionStatusMonths until follow-upFollow-up image modalityDiscordant organ system
    1Liver (11)LN (1)TP0*/9CT/CuLN
    2Bone (15), LN (7), lung (1), carc (1), liver (43)Bone (1)FP8CTNone
    3Liver (6), LN (8), int (1)Liver (1)TP46/46Ga/CTNone
    4Bone (19), spleen (1), int (1), adrenal (1), heart (3), liver (5)Bone (1)TP0*CTNone
    5Liver (2), LN (19) heart (2), int (1)Liver (1)TP39GaNone
    • ↵* Visible CT correlate on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT.

    • LN = lymph nodes; TP = true-positive; Cu = follow-up 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 1 h after injection; carc = intraabdominal carcinomatosis; FP = false-positive; int = intestines; Ga = 68Ga-DOTATOC PET.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Lesion SUVmax

    Lesion SUVmax on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET
    Organ or tissuen*1 h after injection3 h after injectionP†
    Lung517.9 [3.0–32.9]18.7 [5.3–32.1]1.00
    Liver2245.7 [37.2–54.3]54.1 [44.3–64.0]<0.01
    Intestines1264.4 [43.9–84.8]77.8 [52.3–103.3]0.19
    Pancreas879.0 [38.3–119.6]85.9 [35.9–135.8]1.00
    Bone1244.2 [25.7–62.7]50.1 [29.7–70.4]0.46
    Intraabdominal carcinomatosis423.0 [7.7–38.3]24.9 [9.0–40.7]1.00
    Lymph nodes18‡40.9 [26.9–54.9]43.5 [29.1–58.0]0.76
    • ↵* Number of patients with lesions.

    • ↵† Paired t testing with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (n = 7) and capped at 1.00.

    • ↵‡ n = 19 on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection (one additional lymph node lesion detected in 1 patient).

    • Data are mean values followed by 95% confidence interval in brackets.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Normal-Organ SUVmean

    Normal-organ SUVmean† on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET
    Organ or tissuen*1 h after injection3 h after injectionP†
    Lung350.27 [0.23–0.30]0.15 [0.13–0.17]<0.01
    Liver324.0 [3.6–4.4]5.7 [5.2–6.3]<0.01
    Intestines352.6 [2.1–3.1]2.5 [2.0–3.1]1.00
    Uncinate process of pancreas313.2 [2.7–3.6]3.3 [2.7–3.9]1.00
    Cauda of pancreas323.1 [2.8–3.5]3.5 [3.2–3.9]0.38
    Bone350.76 [0.66–0.85]0.64 [0.56–0.73]<0.01
    Muscle350.63 [0.57–0.69]0.49 [0.44–0.54]<0.01
    Spleen358.9 [7.8–10.0]9.3 [8.2–10.4]0.12
    Pituitary gland3512.9 [10.8–14.9]15.8 [13.4–18.2]<0.01
    Adrenal gland339.5 [8.0–11.0]9.9 [8.2–11.6]1.00
    • ↵* Number of patients with evaluable normal organs.

    • ↵† Paired t testing with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (n = 10) and capped at 1.00.

    • Data are mean values followed by 95% confidence interval in brackets.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    TTN

    TTN†
    Organ or tissuen*1 h after injection of 64Cu-DOTATATE3 h after injection of 64Cu-DOTATATEP†
    Lung587.9 [30.2–145.6]160.9 [79.2–242.6]0.04
    Liver1912.6 [10.2–14.9]11.0 [8.7–13.4]0.03
    Intestines1224.2 [14.9–33.4]28.2 [16.5–40.0]0.73
    Pancreas642.4 [12.3–72.5]41.1 [8.7–73.4]1.00
    Bone12103.0 [38.6–167.4]124.2 [57.1–191.2]0.07
    Intraabdominal carcinomatosis414.0 [3.0–25.0]22.5 [7.1–38.0]0.50
    Lymph nodes18‡73.7 [43.0–104.4]94.0 [61.6–126.4]0.07
    • ↵* Number of patients with lesions and evaluable normal tissue.

    • ↵† Paired t testing with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (n = 7) and capped at 1.00.

    • ↵‡ n = 19 on 64Cu-DOTATATE PET at 3 h after injection (one additional lymph node lesion detected in 1 patient).

    • Data are mean values followed by 95% confidence interval in brackets.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine: 62 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 62, Issue 1
January 1, 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection
Mathias Loft, Esben A. Carlsen, Camilla B. Johnbeck, Helle H. Johannesen, Tina Binderup, Andreas Pfeifer, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne K. Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Ulrich Knigge, Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 73-80; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.244509

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
64Cu-DOTATATE PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prospective, Head-to-Head Comparison of Imaging at 1 Hour and 3 Hours After Injection
Mathias Loft, Esben A. Carlsen, Camilla B. Johnbeck, Helle H. Johannesen, Tina Binderup, Andreas Pfeifer, Jann Mortensen, Peter Oturai, Annika Loft, Anne K. Berthelsen, Seppo W. Langer, Ulrich Knigge, Andreas Kjaer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Jan 2021, 62 (1) 73-80; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.244509
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • This Month in JNM
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Routine Use of [64Cu]Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT in a Neuroendocrine Tumor Center: Referral Patterns and Image Results of 2,249 Consecutive Scans
  • Efficacy of [67Cu]Cu-EB-TATE Theranostic Against Somatostatin Receptor Subtype-2-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • An Investigation of Lesion Detection Accuracy for Artificial Intelligence-Based Denoising of Low-Dose 64Cu-DOTATATE PET Imaging in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Semiautomatic Tumor Delineation for Evaluation of 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Prognostication Based on Lowest Lesion Uptake and Total Tumor Volume
  • Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Theranostics

  • Determination of the Intralesional Distribution of Theranostic 124I-Omburtamab Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • Evidence-Based Clinical Protocols to Monitor Efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Real-World Data
  • 177Lu-Labeled Anticlaudin 6 Monoclonal Antibody for Targeted Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
Show more Theranostics

Clinical

  • Addition of 131I-MIBG to PRRT (90Y-DOTATOC) for Personalized Treatment of Selected Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden
  • Hypermetabolism on Pediatric PET Scans of Brain Glucose Metabolism: What Does It Signify?
Show more Clinical

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 64Cu-DOTATATE
  • somatostatin receptor imaging
  • SUV
  • PET/CT
  • neuroendocrine neoplasms
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire