Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportNeurosciences

Gender Differences in Binding Kinetics of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Using microPET/CT with 2-[18F]FA-85380

Samuel Mitchell, Hannah Zhang, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Hsiu-Ming Tsai, Lara Leoni, Richard Freifelder, Brian Roman, Chien-Min Kao, Xiaoxi Zhuang, William Green, Jogeshwar Mukherjee and Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 82;
Samuel Mitchell
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Zhang
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed Bhuiyan
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hsiu-Ming Tsai
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lara Leoni
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Freifelder
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Roman
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chien-Min Kao
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoxi Zhuang
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Green
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jogeshwar Mukherjee
2University of California-Irvine Irvine CA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chin-Tu Chen
1University of Chicago Chicago IL United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

82

Objectives: Although men generally have higher smoking rates than women, nicotine addiction is a public health issue that concerns both genders. Despite its widespread epidemiological relevance, the precise mechanisms underlying nicotine dependence—as well as these gender differences that exist—remains poorly understood. Addiction to nicotine, the substance responsible for tobacco dependence, is predicated on the upregulation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in the brain. Currently, serval positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers, all of which are weak bases, are available for studies of the binding kinetics of nAChRs. They may be classified according to their differential kinetics based on their ligand pKas and receptor affinity. This study used one of high affinity radiotracer, 2-[18F]FA-85380, to examine the gender differences in binding kinetics of nAChRs.

Methods: The 2-[18F]FA-85380 radiotracer was synthesized from the commercially available precursor, 2-TMA-A85380, using an IBA Synthera V2 synthesis module equipped with Synthera preparative HPLC. The tracer (average injected activity = 143.6 uCi, specific activity >3000 mCi/μmole, 99% radiochemical purity) was injected into male and female C57BL/6J mice (3-6 months old) via intraperitoneal catheter within 30 seconds following the start of PET imaging. Dynamic PET acquisition was done for a continuous 180-minute scan and analyzed in 18x10-minute frames. The nAChR binding by 2-[18F]-A85380 in brain regions was assessed using the VivoQuant imaging analysis software with the 3D brain atlas and reported in standardized uptake value (SUV).

Results: The dynamic nAChR binding was first analyzed for the whole brain over 180-minute imaging period. The maximum binding capacity of the female is greater than that of males by 11.2% (0.632 vs. 0.564, SUVmax for females and males, respectively) while the binding peaks at 70 minutes in females compared to 50 minutes in males. The elevated binding capacity of the females remains throughout the rest of scanning time after the peak binding, demonstrating a slower dissociation rate of 2-[18F]-A85380 to nAChR. The brain was then segmented into 13 different functional regions. Assessment of regional nAChR binding capacities revealed highest binding activity in the thalamus (0.864 vs. 0.715, SUVmax for females and males, respectively) and lowest within the cerebellum (0.571 and 0.557, SUVmax for females and males, respectively) for both males and females. Consistently, females have higher nAChR binding than the males within all 13 brain regions. Mice with β2 subunit-knockout nAChR were additionally imaged with 2-[18F]-A85380. This gender difference was also observed in the knockout animals with female knockout demonstrating higher nAChR binding than the male knockout. However, regional differences were not observed in the β2-knockout mice.

Conclusions: The brain regional distribution of nAChR binding by 2-[18F]-A85380, specifically highest uptake within thalamus in contrast to the weakest binding within the cerebellum, is consistent with findings from human studies. The elevated maximum binding of 2-[18F]FA-85380 in females may suggest a higher density of nAChR in the female brain. In addition, one of the hypotheses of the nicotine binding mechanisms is that the ligand/receptor complex is trapped in the intracellular acidic vesicles. The slower dissociation rate observed in females may be indicative of stronger trapping. Together, these observed gender differences in mice may reflect gender differences in the response to nicotine exposure as well as to nicotine cessation treatments in humans. Therefore, more investigation into the binding kinetics of 2-[18F]FA-85380 and other nAChR ligands is necessary. The differences in kinetics and displaceable binding should provide insight into the cellular mechanism of nicotine induced nAChR upregulation and how nicotine agonists alter this process.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gender Differences in Binding Kinetics of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Using microPET/CT with 2-[18F]FA-85380
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Gender Differences in Binding Kinetics of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Using microPET/CT with 2-[18F]FA-85380
Samuel Mitchell, Hannah Zhang, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Hsiu-Ming Tsai, Lara Leoni, Richard Freifelder, Brian Roman, Chien-Min Kao, Xiaoxi Zhuang, William Green, Jogeshwar Mukherjee, Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 82;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gender Differences in Binding Kinetics of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Using microPET/CT with 2-[18F]FA-85380
Samuel Mitchell, Hannah Zhang, Mohammed Bhuiyan, Hsiu-Ming Tsai, Lara Leoni, Richard Freifelder, Brian Roman, Chien-Min Kao, Xiaoxi Zhuang, William Green, Jogeshwar Mukherjee, Chin-Tu Chen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 82;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Neurosciences

  • PET CT Quantification to direct Alzheimer’s patients to anti-amyloid therapy
  • Multicenter trial study for usefulness of physical parameters toward the standardization of brain SPECT image: relation to visual analysis
  • Assessment of Brain Perfusion 123I-IMP SPECT imaging Using Low Energy High Resolution Collimator image reconstructed by Flash 3D
Show more Neurosciences

Basic Science - Synaptic activity and other mechanisms

  • Real-time LB-102 target engagement using [11C]Raclopride PET
  • In Vivo Synaptic Density imaging with 18F-UCB-H after Space Irradiation
Show more Basic Science - Synaptic activity and other mechanisms

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire