Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting ReportGeneral Clinical Specialties

Sincalide-stimulated cholescintigraphy: A retrospective study and proposal of a modified workflow.

Anil Vasireddi and Nghi Nguyen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 421;
Anil Vasireddi
1Department of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PITTSBURGH PA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nghi Nguyen
2Department of Radiology University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Pittsburgh PA United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

421

Introduction: Sincalide-stimulated cholescintigraphy (SSC) is an effective tool to quantify the gallbladder contraction. The current guideline calls for a 60-min sincalide infusion of 0.02 μg/kg body weight, and a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) >38% at 60 min is considered normal. We hypothesize that many subjects with normal GBEF will do so by the 30-min mark; and if true, an enhanced workflow is proposed.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 147 adults who underwent a clinically indicated SSC as per standard 60-min infusion. The auto-generated GBEF was calculated as follows: [(maximum count - minimum count)/ maximum count] x 100, corrected for background and decay; and the time-activity-curve (TAC) displayed the GBEF in min-interval for 60 min. In subjects with GBEF >38% at standard 60-min scan, the GBEF at 20 min and 30 min were obtained manually based on the auto-generated GBEF TAC, using pixel distance measurements on an iSite PACS monitor. GBEF at 30 min was calculated as [(maximum pixel distance - pixel distance at 30 min)/ maximum pixel distance] x 100. The manually generated GBEF at 20 min and 30 min were correlated with the auto-generated ones, whenever available, using student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation. Subgroup analyses assessed the potential impact of gender, age, and occurrence of patient symptoms on the GBEF, using Fisher’s exact test.

Results: Of the 147 subjects, there were 40 males and 107 females, mean age 48.4±16.3 years. Under the standard 60-minute protocol, a normal GBEF >38% was achieved in 131/147 subjects (89.1%). Of these, normal GBEF was seen in 82/131 subjects (62.6%) at 20 minutes and in 107/131 subjects (81.7%) at 30 minutes. There was no significant difference across subgroups of gender, age (≤40 vs. >40 years old), or presence/absence of symptoms, stratified by GBEF ≤38% vs. >38%, see Table. 55/131 subjects (42.0%) with normal GBEF developed abdominal symptoms during the 60-min sincalide infusion. Manually calculated GBEF correlated well with the auto-generated ones (R>0.9, p>0.05[AV1] ). A modified workflow for SSC is proposed which aims to improve procedure efficiency and reduce patients’ discomfort and symptoms associated with the sincalide infusion, while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Instead of obtaining the GBEF after completion of the standard 60-min sincalide infusion, the data acquisition should be divided into 2 x 30 min sections so a screening GBEF could be obtained at the 30-min mark, while the acquisition of 2nd section ensues. If a normal GBEF (>38%) is achieved at 30 min, the study may be stopped, which would result in close to 30 min reduction in scan time and help reduce patient discomfort and abdominal symptoms. Otherwise, the study would continue until the acquisition of the 2nd section has been completed, and data of both sections are combined to derive the final GBEF. The proposed workflow modification has been validated at our institution based on the GE Xeleris, version 3.0 and 3.1, and has been deemed feasible. Conclusion: Most patients (81.7%) with a normal SSC achieved the GBEF >38% already by 30 min. The proposed workflow of dividing the 60-min data acquisition into 2 x 30 min sections and obtaining a screening GBEF at 30 min would have a positive impact on procedure efficiency and help reduce patients’ discomfort and side effects from sincalide administration.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Subgroup analyses by gender, age, and presence/absence of symptoms stratified by GBEF.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sincalide-stimulated cholescintigraphy: A retrospective study and proposal of a modified workflow.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Sincalide-stimulated cholescintigraphy: A retrospective study and proposal of a modified workflow.
Anil Vasireddi, Nghi Nguyen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 421;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sincalide-stimulated cholescintigraphy: A retrospective study and proposal of a modified workflow.
Anil Vasireddi, Nghi Nguyen
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 421;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

General Clinical Specialties

  • Genito-urinary uptake patterns and incidental lesions on a bone scan: Case based multimodality pictorial review.
  • Embryology, anatomy, physiology, and normal and abnormal radiopharmaceutical concentration in the pituitary gland: An educational exhibit
  • Is Imaging of Bacteria with PET a realistic goal?
Show more General Clinical Specialties

Gastroenterology

  • Liquid Gastric Emptying Study is often Abnormal after Normal Gastric Solid Emptying – Institutional Experience in a VA Hospital
  • 99mTc-Macroaggregated Albumin (MAA) stability when used in the SNMMI Procedure Guideline for Adult Solid-Meal Gastric-Emptying scintigraphy
  • Variability of DACS Antral Contraction Frequency and Ejection Fraction in Normals
Show more Gastroenterology

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire