Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Correlation between T-PSA, Gleason Score and the result of [18F]-FCH PET/CT including SUVmax in patients with prostate cancer: retrospective analysis.

Paulina Cegla, Geoffrey Currie, Katarzyna Scibisz-Dziedzic, Kamila Witkowska, Natalia Siminiak, Katarzyna Pietrasz, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Tomasz Piotrowski, Rafal Czepczynski and Beata Chrapko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3104;
Paulina Cegla
1Nuclear Medicine Department Greater Poland Cancer Center Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey Currie
2Nuclear Medicine School of Dentistry and Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katarzyna Scibisz-Dziedzic
3Nuclear Medicine Department Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kamila Witkowska
4Nuclear Medicine Department Affidea Medical Center Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalia Siminiak
5Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Poznan University of Medical Science Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katarzyna Pietrasz
1Nuclear Medicine Department Greater Poland Cancer Center Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krzysztof Matuszewski
6Medical Physics Department Greater Poland Cancer Center Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomasz Piotrowski
8Medical Physics Department Greater Poland Cancer Centre Poznan Poland
7Chair and Department of Electroradiology Poznan University of Medical Science Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rafal Czepczynski
9Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine Poznan University of Medical Science Poznan Poland
4Nuclear Medicine Department Affidea Medical Center Poznan Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beata Chrapko
3Nuclear Medicine Department Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3104

Aim: The aim of this analysis was to assess the correlation between T-PSA, Gleason score and the results of [18F]-FCH PET/CT including SUVmax in prostate cancer patients using conventional statistical approach and an artificial neural network in parallel.

Methods: Retrospectively 754 [18F]-FCH PET/CT studies were analysed, where 169 were performed for staging and 585 because of suspicion of recurrence of prostate cancer. The data was evaluated using conventional statistical approaches and an artificial neural network. There were 19 input variables in 754 patients using unsupervised learning of data representation to uncover associations.

Results: The T-PSA was statistically higher for staging patients compared to recurrence patients (58.4 vs. 23.0; p=0.0002). The prostate SUVmax was statistically higher for those with pelvic lymph node metastases (LN) compared to those without (7.7 vs. 6.5; p=0.013). There was a statistically significant higher SUVmax for staging patients compared to recurrence patients (8.4 vs. 5.7; p<0.001). In the staging group, statistically significant differences were only noted for T-PSA in patients with more than 5 bone metastases (245.5 vs. 38.8; p<0.001). In contrast, the recurrence group demonstrated statistically significant increases in T-PSA for those with specific disease sites including: pelvic LN (41.3 vs. 13.3; p=0.0007), abdominal LN (64.8 vs. 14.8; p<0.001), thoracic LN (64.8 vs. 15.1; p<0.001), H&N LN (112.5 vs. 18.6; p<0.001) and more than 5 bone metastases (113.3 vs. 9.1; p<0.001). T-PSA was statistically higher for those with disseminated disease than clear (p<0.001), local (p=0.003) or LN (p=0.001) based disease with no other relationships noted. Further analysis was undertaken using an artificial neural network and a binary classification of disseminated disease (cumulative bone, disseminated and organ metastases) or local (lymph node, local, prostate and clear). The strongest correlation with the binary classification were single bone metastases (0.383), more than 5 bone metastases (0.361) and 2-5 bone metastases (0.348). T-PSA (0.254), SUV (0.0178) and Gleason score (0.114) ranked lower. The final architecture of the neural network correlated with a sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 53.8% and this is reflected in area under the curve of 0.538 (ROC analysis).

Conclusions: Prostate cancer is more likely to be disseminated if the patient is independently and collectively: under 60 years, Gleason score above 7, T-PSA above 60, SUVmax above 12, or in patients presenting scanned for recurrence.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correlation between T-PSA, Gleason Score and the result of [18F]-FCH PET/CT including SUVmax in patients with prostate cancer: retrospective analysis.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Correlation between T-PSA, Gleason Score and the result of [18F]-FCH PET/CT including SUVmax in patients with prostate cancer: retrospective analysis.
Paulina Cegla, Geoffrey Currie, Katarzyna Scibisz-Dziedzic, Kamila Witkowska, Natalia Siminiak, Katarzyna Pietrasz, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Tomasz Piotrowski, Rafal Czepczynski, Beata Chrapko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3104;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Correlation between T-PSA, Gleason Score and the result of [18F]-FCH PET/CT including SUVmax in patients with prostate cancer: retrospective analysis.
Paulina Cegla, Geoffrey Currie, Katarzyna Scibisz-Dziedzic, Kamila Witkowska, Natalia Siminiak, Katarzyna Pietrasz, Krzysztof Matuszewski, Tomasz Piotrowski, Rafal Czepczynski, Beata Chrapko
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3104;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Manual and Computer-Generated Methods for Segmentation of the Aorta in Lymphoma Patients from PET/CT Imaging
  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
Show more

Technologist Poster Session

  • Development of Radiolabeling Methods for 5 Fluorouracil (5FU) with Technetium-99mfor Preclinical Nuclear Imaging (PNI)
  • TRANQUILTY SCORING TO OPTIMIZE PEDIATRIC IMAGING AND REDUCE RADIATION EXPOSURE ON TOTAL-BODY PET SCANNERS
  • Impact of BSREM reconstruction algorithm on image quality and quantification accuracy of PET-a phantom study
Show more Technologist Poster Session

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire