Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • SNMMI
    • JNM
    • JNMT
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • JNM Supplement
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
    • Continuing Education
    • JNM Podcasts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Institutional and Non-member
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNM
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • View or Listen to JNM Podcast
  • Visit JNM on Facebook
  • Join JNM on LinkedIn
  • Follow JNM on Twitter
  • Subscribe to our RSS feeds
Meeting Report

Splenic Response Ratio: A Tool to Assess Stress Adequacy in Adenosine Rubidium PET Myocardial Perfusion

Craig Copland, Leon Menezes, Maria Burniston, Leanne Price, Barbara Ribeiro, Rebecca Gregory and Giorgio Testanera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3043;
Craig Copland
1Barts Health NHS Trust London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leon Menezes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Burniston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leanne Price
1Barts Health NHS Trust London United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Ribeiro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Gregory
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giorgio Testanera
2Bartshealth NHS Trust LONDON United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Abstract

3043

Background: Adenosine induces splenic vasoconstriction, which has been used to assess the adequacy of pharmacological stress in Cardiac MRI, where almost 10% of patients are shown to be understressed, leading to false negative results. We aimed to document the prevalence of inadequate stress in Rubidium PET perfusion, by assessing splenic response ratio (SRR) which is (Spleen stress/Liver stress)/(Spleen rest/Liver rest).

Methods: 59 consecutive patients referred for Rubidium PET perfusion were analyzed retrospectively. 36 Men 23 women, mean age 67. Patients received 6 minutes' adenosine infusion (140 mcg/min/kg) for 6 minutes and Pulse and Blood Pressure (BP) were recorded. Spleen and liver Rb-82 activity was measured at stress and rest and the SRR calculated and related to change in haemodynamics during adenosine vasodilatation, and Global Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR).

Results: The spleen was visualized in all patients. SRR inversely correlated with change in pulse (r=0.62) but not with change in BP (r=0.04), nor correlated with Global MFR(r=0.1).

Conclusions: SRR potentially identifies non-responders to adenosine vasodilatation, identified by a lack of heart rate response. Non-responders are at risk for false negative results on Rubidium PET perfusion. Repeat scans with increased adenosine, an alternative stress agent, or fully compliant preparation could improve test performance.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Vol. 61, Issue supplement 1
May 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Splenic Response Ratio: A Tool to Assess Stress Adequacy in Adenosine Rubidium PET Myocardial Perfusion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine web site.
Citation Tools
Splenic Response Ratio: A Tool to Assess Stress Adequacy in Adenosine Rubidium PET Myocardial Perfusion
Craig Copland, Leon Menezes, Maria Burniston, Leanne Price, Barbara Ribeiro, Rebecca Gregory, Giorgio Testanera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3043;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Splenic Response Ratio: A Tool to Assess Stress Adequacy in Adenosine Rubidium PET Myocardial Perfusion
Craig Copland, Leon Menezes, Maria Burniston, Leanne Price, Barbara Ribeiro, Rebecca Gregory, Giorgio Testanera
Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2020, 61 (supplement 1) 3043;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Manual and Computer-Generated Methods for Segmentation of the Aorta in Lymphoma Patients from PET/CT Imaging
  • Rest Dose Spillover Correction of Stress Blood Flow Measurements in Digital Rb-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT Imaging
  • Radiolabeled hyaluronic acid (HA) fragments for lymphatic imaging
Show more

Tech Papers V: Cardiovascular Science & Neuroscience Technologist Papers

  • Flortaucipir (AV-1451) Imaging
  • 68Ga-Galmydar PET Tracer for Noninvasive Early Detection of Taxane Induced Cardiotoxicity
  • Evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve using [13N]ammonia-PET/CT in comparison with 99mTc-tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT
Show more Tech Papers V: Cardiovascular Science & Neuroscience Technologist Papers

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire